Validation studies of the OPCS scale — more useful than the Barthel Index?

Abstract

The OPCS scales of disability were developed as a survey tool to estimate the prevalence of disability amongst adults in the UK. This study evaluates the use of the OPCS scales in a clinical setting. A total of 265 patients attending a rehabilitation unit and wheelchair centre were assessed. The OPCS scales were validated against the standard Barthel Index and sensitivity to change over time was examined. An inter-rater reliability study was also performed. The results showed good correlation between the OPCS scales and Barthel Index (0.82, p < 0.001, n = 265) and it was shown that the OPCS scales were sensitive to clinical change over a six-month period. Inter-rater reliability was also good (0.96, p < 0.001, n = 120). The 95% confidence limits were also examined. The 'ceiling' effect of the Barthel Index is not found in the OPCS scales of disability. The results of the study support further use of the OPCS scales and suggest that it has a place in the assessment of rehabilitation outcome.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Mahoney FI , Barthel DW Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965; 14: 61-65.

Wade DT , Collin C. The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability? Int Disabil Stud 1988; 10: 64-67.

Wade DT Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications, 1992.

Collin C. , Wade DT , Davis S. , Home V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud 1988; 10: 61-63.

Appelgate WB , Blass JP , Williams TF Instruments for the functional assessment of older patients. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 1207-14.

Bond MJ , Harris RD An examination of the factor structure of the Frenchay Activities Index. Disabil Rehabil 1992; 14: 27-29.

World Health Organization. The international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps . Geneva, World Health Organization , 1980.

Martin J. , Meleer M. , Elliot D. The prevalence of disability among adults. London: HMSO, OPCS, 1988.

Warren M. The prevalence of disability. J R Col Phys Lond 1989; 23: 171-75.

10.

Meenan RF , Gurtnum PM , Masson JM Measuring health status in arthritis. The Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales . Arthritis Rheum 1980; 23: 146-52.

11.

Hill J. , Bird MA , Lawton CW , Wright V. The Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales: an anglicised version to assess the outcome of British patients with rheumatism. Br J Rheumatod 1990; 29: 193-96.

12.

Kirwan JR , Reeback JS Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire - modified to assess disability in British patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1986; 25: 206-209.

13.

Granger CV , Dewis LS , Peters NC , Sherwood CC , Barrett JC Stroke rehabilitation: analysis of repeated Barthel Index measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1979; 60: 14-17.

14.

McAndrew Ljh , Hanley J. Survey of the younger disabled in the community in Lothian. Int Disabil Stud 1987;9:74-77.

15.

Granger CV , Hamilton BB , Keith RA , Zielezny M. , Sherwin FS Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation. Top Geriatr Rehabil 1986; 1(3): 59-74.

16.

Roy CW , Togneri J. , Hay E. , Pentland B. An inter-rater reliability study of the Barthel Index. IntJ Rehabil Res 1988; 11: 67-70.

17.

Wylie EM , White BK A measure of disability. Arch Environ Health 1964; 8: 834-37.

18.

Nouri FM , Lincoln NB An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 1987; 1: 301-305.