Relationship between active range of motion deficits and muscle strength and tone at the elbow in patients with hemiparesis

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe the relationship between deficits in active range of motion (ROM) at the elbow and both agonist muscle strength and antagonist muscle tone in patients with stroke. Twenty-three patients with non-flaccid hemiparesis participated. Active elbow flexion and extension ROM were measured gravity eliminated bilaterally and ROM deficits were calculated for the paretic side. Isometric elbow flexion and extension strength were measured on the paretic side using a hand-held dynamometer. Elbow flexor and extensor muscle tone were graded manually using the Modified Ashworth Scale. The Spearman correlations between active elbow flexion ROM deficits and elbow flexion force, and between active elbow extension ROM deficits and elbow extension force were -.929 and -.772 respectively. The correlations between the elbow flexion ROM deficits and elbow extensor muscle tone, and between the elbow extension ROM deficits and elbow flexor muscle tone were .287 and .480 respectively. Regression analysis revealed a curvilinear relationship between active elbow flexion ROM deficits and elbow flexion force (R =.881), and a linear relationship between active elbow extension ROM deficits and elbow extension force (R = .771). In patients like those tested, agonist muscle force (strength) may be more important than passive antagonist restraint (tone) as a determinant of ROM deficits. Because a limited amount of muscle force is required for full active ROM, increases in muscle strength beyond some threshold will not be accompanied by further improvements in active ROM.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Wade DT , Hewer RL , Skilbeck CE , David RM Stroke. A critical approach to diagnosis, treatment, and management. London: Chapman and Hall Ltd, 1985: 23.

Bard G. , Hirschberg G. Recovery of voluntary motion in upper extremity following hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1965; 46: 567-78.

Fugl-Meyer AR , Jääskö L. , Leyman I. , Olsson S. , Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. I. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975; 7: 13-31.

Bohannon RW Muscle strength changes in hemiparetic stroke patients during inpatient rehabilitation . J Neuro Rehab 1988; 2: 163-66.

Bohannon RW Selected determinants of ambulatory capacity in patients with hemiplegia. Clin Rehabil 1989; 3: 47-53.

Sunderland A. , Tinson D. , Bradley L. , Hewer RL Arm function after stroke. An evaluation of grip strength as a measure of recovery and a prognostic indicator. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1989; 52: 1267-72.

Sjöström M. , Fugl-Meyer AR , Nordin G. , Wahlby L. Post-stroke hemiplegia; crural muscle strength and structure. Scand J Rehabil Med 1980; 7(Suppl): 53-60.

Nakamura R. , Watanabe S. , Handa T. , Morohashi I. The relationship between walking speed and muscle strength for knee extension in hemiparetic stroke patients: a follow-up study. Tohoku J exp Med 1988; 154: 111-13.

Bobath B. Adult hemiplegia evaluation and treatment, Second edition. London: William Heinemann Medical Books Ltd, 1970: 18-19.

10.

Davies PM Steps to follow. A guide to treatment of adult hemiplegia. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1985: 33, 47, 48, 77, 78.

11.

Johnstone M. Restoration of motor function in the stroke patient. London : Churchill-Livingstone, 1978: 15-18.

12.

Bohannon RW , Smith MB Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth Scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther 1987 ; 67: 206-207.

13.

Shrout PE , Fleiss JL : Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 420-28.

14.

Norkin CC , White JD Measurement of joint motion: a guide to goniometry. Philadelphia : FA Davis, 1985; 20, 38, 39.

15.

Bohannon RW , Reed ML , Gajdosik RL Electrically evoked knee flexion torque increases with increased pelvifemoral angles. Clin Biomech 1990; 5: 17-22.

16.

Gandevia SC , McKenzie DK Activation of human muscles at short muscle lengths during maximal static efforts. J Physiol 1988; 407: 599-613.

17.

van Zuylen EJ , van Velzen A. , Dehier van der Gon JJ A biomechanical model for flexion torques of human arm muscles as a function of elbow angle. J Biomech 1988; 21: 183-90.

18.

Williams M. , Tomberlin JA , Robertson KJ Muscle force curves of school children. J Ameri Phys Ther Assoc 1965; 45: 539-49.

19.

Wiegner AW , Watts RL Elastic properties of muscles measured at the elbow in man: I. normal controls . J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1986; 49: 1171-76.

20.

Bohannon RW , Larkin PA , Smith MB , Horton MG Relationships between static muscle strength deficits and spasticity in stroke patients with hemiparesis. Phys Ther 1987; 67: 1068-71.