Patients who do not recognise their disabilities are extremely difficult to treat and manage. This paper describes a method by which feedback about errors was provided for a patient who could not acknowledge that his intellectual function was impaired following a severe head injury. This brought about a shift in his attitude and aided his successful resettlement. The nature of denial following brain injury is discussed.
Groswasser Z. , Mendelson MJ, Stern MJ, Schechter I., Najenson T.Reevaluation of prognostic factors in rehabilitation after severe head injury. ScandJ Rehab Med1977; 9: 147-49.
3.
Najenson T., Groswasser Z., Mendelson L., Hackett P.Rehabilitation outcome of brain damaged patients after severe head injury . Int Rehab Med1980; 2: 17-22.
4.
Najenson T., Groswasser Z., Stern M. et al. Prognostic factors in rehabilitation after severe head injury . Scand J Rehab Med1975; 7: 101-105.
5.
Powell GEBrain function therapy. Aldershot: Gower, 1981.
6.
Miller E.Recovery and management of neuropsychological impairments. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 1984.
7.
Romano MDFamily response to traumatic head injury. Scand J Rehab Med1974; 6: 1-4.
8.
Weinstein EA , Kahn RLDenial of illness. Springfield : Thomas, 1955.
9.
Walsh KWNeuropsychology: a clinical approach. Edinburgh : Churchill Livingstone, 1978.
10.
Konow A., Pribam KHError recognition and utilisation produced by injury to the frontal cortex in man. Neuropsychologia1970; 8: 489-91.
11.
Luria ARHigher cortical function in man. London: Tavistock Publications, 1966.
12.
McCool JAIn memory of a brain tumour. Br Med J1985 ; 290(i): 296-97.
