Abstract
Objective
To translate and culturally adapt the Foot Health Status Questionnaire into Arabic (Foot Health Status Questionnaire-Ar) and investigate its psychometric properties in patients with various foot conditions.
Design
Cross-sectional study.
Participants
Participants included 135 adult patients from Saudi Arabia (83.7% females) with foot problems (mean age=38.1 years).
Main measures
We utilized the intraclass correlation coefficient and Cronbach's alpha to evaluate the test–retest reliability and internal consistency, respectively, of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire-Ar domains. To evaluate construct validity, we calculated Pearson's correlation coefficients between the Foot Health Status Questionnaire-Ar domains scores and other related constructs, including the Foot Function Index, Numeric Pain Rating Scale, and the EuroQol Health Questionnaire, five-dimension, five-level. Floor and ceiling effects were also assessed to determine the scale's ability to discriminate across the full range of scores.
Results
The Foot Health Status Questionnaire-Ar exhibited acceptable test–retest reliability, with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.760−0.858 across four domains. Internal consistency was good, with Cronbach's α values between 0.843 and 0.912 across the domains. The construct validity was supported by significant correlations between the Foot Health Status Questionnaire-Ar domains and related constructs, including the Foot Function Index, Numeric Pain Rating Scale, and EuroQol Health Questionnaire.
Conclusion
Foot Health Status Questionnaire-Ar is a reliable and valid scale for evaluating foot health in Arabic-speaking populations. These results support its use in research and clinical settings for evaluating foot health.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
