Abstract
Objective
To examine the feasibility of a home-based high-intensity balance training programme (HBBT-MS) and its preliminary efficacy in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS).
Design
A single-group pretest-posttest design.
Setting
Community.
Subjects
Twenty-eight individuals with MS (23 female (82%); mean age: 55.2 ± 11.9).
Interventions
Participants performed the program for 30 minutes per session, 3 days per week for 12 weeks, with the support of a family member to ensure safety while maintaining a high balance challenge.
Main measures
Feasibility was assessed using four domains of process, resources, management, and scientific outcomes. Physical function (static balance, lower-extremity function, and mobility), dual-tasking, cognitive function (processing speed, verbal memory, and visuospatial memory), and self-reported outcomes (fatigue, dual-task difficulty, ambulation difficulty, and fear of falling) were assessed at baseline and post-intervention.
Results
Twenty-six out of 28 participants completed both the pretest and posttest (adherence rate: 92.9%). No severe adverse events attributed to this program were reported. There were significant and small-to-medium improvements in static balance (d = 0.74, p < 0.001), lower-extremity function (d = 0.70, p < 0.001), and mobility (d = 0.34, p = 0.004), with no improvement observed in dual-tasking. Participants showed significant and medium improvement in processing speed (d = 0.71, p = 0.007) and visuospatial memory (d = 0.55, p = 0.22), but not verbal memory (d = 0.02, p = 0.22). We observed significant improvements in all self-reported outcomes.
Conclusions
The HBBT-MS was feasible, safe, and acceptable. Further evaluation using a controlled design is warranted to examine the effectiveness of the programme.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
