Response letter: The only defendable scientific position: A strong case against radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy for insertional Achilles tendinopathy
Restricted accessLetterFirst published online May, 2025
Response letter: The only defendable scientific position: A strong case against radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy for insertional Achilles tendinopathy
RompeJDFuriaJMaffulliN. Eccentric loading compared with shock wave treatment for chronic insertional Achilles tendinopathy: a randomized, controlled trial. JBJS2008; 90: 52–61.
2.
RompeJDFuriaJMaffulliN. Eccentric loading versus eccentric loading plus shock-wave treatment for midportion Achilles tendinopathy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med2009; 37: 463–470.
3.
HafliðadóttirSHJuhlCBNielsenSM, et al.Placebo response and effect in randomized clinical trials: meta-research with focus on contextual effects. Trials2021; 22: 1–15.
4.
KenmokuTIwakuraNOchiaiN, et al.Influence of different energy patterns on efficacy of radial shock wave therapy. J Orthop Sci2021; 26: 698–703.
5.
ZhangYFYangLIUShao-WenCHOU,et al.Dose-related effects of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy for knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med2020; 53: 2742.
6.
AlsulaimaniBPerratonLVallanceP, et al.Does shockwave therapy lead to better pain and function than sham over 12 weeks in people with insertional Achilles tendinopathy? A randomised controlled trial. Clin Rehabil2024; 39: 174–186.
7.
HeideMRøeCMørkM, et al.Is radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT), sham-rESWT or a standardised exercise programme in combination with advice plus customised foot orthoses more effective than advice plus customised foot orthoses alone in the treatment of plantar fasciopathy? A double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Br J Sports Med2024; 58: 910–918.
