Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of the threshold value of Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Subscales on quantified movement as a function of gender.

Design study

Retrospective cohort study.

Settings

Single center study.

Participants

One hundred forty patients (aged 38.4) with chronic low back pain and referred to functional restauration program.

Intervention

Patients participated in a five-week multidisciplinary Functional Restoration Program between 1 April 2013 and 1 April 2019, evaluated with clinical scales, psychosocial care and objective gait analysis. This study was a noninterventional retrospective study.

Main measures

Objective gait analysis with the Vicon Motion Systems (Ltd, Oxford, UK), Fear-Avoidance Belief Scale, Visual Analog Scale, the DALLAS Pain Questionnaire, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

Results

Data from 131 patients were studied. Patients with significant Fear-Avoidance Beliefs scores walked with significantly higher cadence. Patients with higher work subscale values presented significantly lower cadence, without effects on step length and self-selected speed. Women with significant fear-avoidance belief score walked with higher step length (0.58 m (0.05)) than men with significant fear-avoidance belief score (0.61 m (0.05). Correlations between Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire and spatiotemporal parameters were gender-dependent but nonsignificant or low.

Conclusions

The threshold values depicted in the literature on psychometric analysis reveal low but quantitative effect of fear-avoidance on spatiotemporal parameters. These threshold values can be used by clinicians to evaluate the significance of the clinical scale. Considering gait, cadence should help the clinician to assess the fear-avoidance, particularly for patients are not able to complete all clinical scale items.

Keywords

Low back pain avoidance behavior gait gender cutoff value

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Delpierre

Ritz

. Strategies and movement analysis with contortionists. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2010; 13: 49–50.

Delpierre

. Fear-avoidance beliefs, anxiety and depression are associated with motor control and dynamics parameters in patients with chronic low back pain. J Orthop 2022; 29: 44–49.

Van Diëen

JHV

Reeves

Kawchuk

, et al. Motor control changes in low back pain: divergence in presentations and mechanisms. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019; 49: 370–379.

Jiménez-Trujillo

López-de-Andrés

Del Barrio

, et al. Gender differences in the prevalence and characteristics of pain in Spain: report from a population-based study. Pain Med 2019; 20: 2349–2359.

Waddell

Newton

Henderson

, et al. A fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain 1993; 52: 157–168.

Wertli

Rasmussen-Barr

Weiser

, et al. The role of fear avoidance beliefs as a prognostic factor for outcome in patients with nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review. Spine J 2014; 14: 816–836.e4.

Trinderup

Fisker

Bogh Juhl

, et al. Fear avoidance beliefs as a predictor for long-term sick leave, disability and pain in patients with chronic low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2018; 19: 431.

Delpierre

Michaud

Guênê

. Is lower motor control on the trunk in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain linked to difficulties in working despite functional restoration programs? J Bodyw Mov Ther 2024; 40: 168–175.

Cardoso de Melo Silva

Ribeiro Tottoli

Mascarenhas

, et al.

Is kinesiophobia associated with disturbances in dynamic balance in individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain?

Brazilian Journal of Pain 2022; 5: 47–51.

10.

Meier

Stämpfli

Vrana

, et al. Neural correlates of fear of movement in patients with chronic low back pain vs. pain-free individuals. Front Hum Neurosci 2016; 10: 386.

11.

Rovner

Sunnerhagen

Björkdahl

, et al. Chronic pain and sex-differences; women accept and move, while men feel blue. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0175737.

12.

Bordeleau

Vincenot

Lefevre

, et al. Treatments for kinesiophobia in people with chronic pain: a scoping review. Front Behav Neurosci 2022; 16: 933483.

13.

Olugbade

Bianchi-Berthouze

Williams

ACC

. The relationship between guarding, pain, and emotion. Pain Rep 2019; 4: e770.

14.

Desai

Amonkar

. A comparison of the spatio-temporal parameters during gait in subjects with and without chronic low back pain: a systematic review. Int J Sci Res 2021; 10: 62–75.

15.

Zale

Lange

Fields

, et al. The relation between pain-related fear and disability: a meta-analysis. J Pain 2013; 14: 1019–1030.

16.

Nava-Bringas

Macías-Hernández

Vásquez-Ríos

, et al. Fear-avoidance beliefs increase perception of pain and disability in Mexicans with chronic low back pain. Rev Bras Reumatol Engl Ed 2017; 57: 306–310.

17.

Swinkels-Meewisse

Swinkels

Verbeek

, et al. Psychometric properties of the Tampa scale for kinesiophobia and the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire in acute low back pain. Man Ther 2003; 8: 29–36.

18.

Crombez

Vlaeyen

Heuts

, et al. Pain-related fear is more disabling than pain itself: evidence on the role of pain-related fear in chronic back pain disability. Pain 1999; 80: 329–339.

19.

Franchignoni

Giordano

Rocca

, et al. A further Rasch analysis of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire in adults with chronic low back pain suggests the revision of its rating scale. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2021; 57: 110–119.

20.

Aasdahl

Marchand

Gismervik

SØ

, et al.

The Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) does it really measure fear beliefs?

Spine. (Phila Pa 1976) 2020; 45: 134–140.

21.

Fritz

George

. Identifying specific psychosocial factors in patients with acute, work-related low back pain: the importance of fear-avoidance beliefs. Phys Ther 2002; 82: 973–983.

22.

Cleland

Fritz

Brennan

. Predictive validity of initial fear avoidance beliefs in patients with low back pain receiving physical therapy: is the FABQ a useful screening tool for identifying patients at risk for a poor recovery? Eur Spine J 2008; 17: 70–79.

23.

Smith

Stabbert

Bagwell

, et al. Do people with low back pain walk differently? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sport Health Sci 2022; 11: 450–465.

24.

Kyoung

Joo-Yeon

Sung-Young

. A study on the characteristics of gait in patients with chronic low back pain. The Journal Korean Sociaty of Physical Therapy 2009; 21: 79–85.

25.

Hollman

Watkins

Imhoff

, et al. A comparison of variability in spatiotemporal gait parameters between treadmill and overground walking conditions. Gait Posture 2016; 43: 204–209.

26.

Haddas

Lieberman

Block

. The relationship between fear-avoidance and objective biomechanical measures of function in patients with adult degenerative scoliosis. Spine 2018; 43: 647–653.

27.

Haddas

Boah

Block

. Fear-avoidance and patients’ reported outcomes are strongly correlated with biomechanical gait parameters in cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients. Clin Spine Surg 2021; 34: E289–E294.

28.

Bohannan

Wang

. Four-meter gait speed: normative values and reliability determined for adults participating in the NIH toolbox study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2019; 100: 509–513.

29.

Zhang

Wang

Awrejcewicz

, et al. Using gold-standard gait analysis methods to assess experience effects on lower-limb mechanics during moderate high-heeled jogging and running. J Vis Exp 2017; 127: 55714.

30.

Morio

Izawa

Omori

, et al. The relationship between walking speed and step length in older aged patients. Diseases 2019; 7: 17.

31.

Delacour

Servonnet

Perrot

, et al. La courbe ROC (receiver operating characteristic): principes et principales applications en biologie clinique. Ann Biol Clin 2005; 63: 145–154.

32.

Hajian-Tilaki

. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for medical diagnostic test evaluation. Caspian J Intern Med 2013; 4: 627–635.

33.

Hanley

McNeil

. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983; 148: 839–843.

34.

Al-Obaidi

Al-Zoabi

Al-Shuwaie

, et al. The influence of pain and pain-related fear and disability beliefs on walking velocity in chronic low back pain. Int J Rehabil Res 2003; 26: 101–108.

35.

Monticone

Frigau

Vernon

, et al. Reliability, responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the two Fear Avoidance And Beliefs Questionnaire Scales in Italian subjects with chronic low back pain undergoing multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2020; 56: 600–606.

36.

Meucci

Fassa

Faria

. Prevalence of chronic low back pain: systematic review. Rev Saude Publica 2015; 49: 1.

37.

Yazdani

Dizji

Alizadeh

, et al. Effect of chronic idiopathic low back pain on the kinetic gait characteristics in different foot masks. J Biomech 2018; 79: 243–247.

38.

Delpierre

Ritz

Garnier

. Preliminary clusters analysis based on functional disability scales for chronic low back pain. Kinematic and EMG differences. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2017; 20: 55–56.

39.

Delpierre

Audat

Garnier

. Gait analysis on chronic low back pain clusters before rehabilitation program: kinematic and kinetic approaches. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2020; 22: 197–198.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.20 MB

Effects of Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire thresholds and gender on spatiotemporal parameters during walking in patients with chronic low back pain

Abstract

Objective

Design study

Settings

Participants

Intervention

Main measures

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material