To provide information regarding the procedures, safety, tolerability, and measurement properties of the 6-min step test.
Data sources
MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus (from inception until January 2024).
Review methods
Studies that examined adults with acute or chronic diseases, and outcomes related to procedures, safety, tolerability, or measurement properties of the 6-min step test were included. Outcome data were summarized and combined in meta-analyses. The quality of included studies was assessed by the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments checklist, and the quality of evidence was determined according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system.
Results
Fourteen studies, involving 847 participants, were included. All studies performed the 6-min step test in 6 min; however, some studies varied the step height and the use of upper limb support. The test appears to be safe and well tolerated by individuals. Moderate- to high-quality evidence demonstrated appropriate results for test-retest reliability (4 studies; Intraclass correlation coefficient 0.96; 95% CI 0.91–0.98; n = 125), criterion validity (4 studies; r = 0.53; 95% CI 0.30–0.71; n = 307), and construct validity (4 studies; r = 0.63; 95% CI 0.52–0.73; n = 233).
Conclusion
This review provides recommendations for applying the 6-min step test in clinical and research settings. No adverse events were reported, and the test appears to be well tolerated. Adequate results were found for test-retest reliability, criterion validity, and construct validity.
PiercyKLTroianoRPBallardRM, et al.The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. JAMA2018 Nov 20; 320: 2020–2028.
2.
SaundersDHSandersonMHayesS, et al.Physical fitness training for stroke patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2020 Mar 20; 3: CD003316.
3.
LavieCJOzemekCCarboneS, et al.Sedentary behavior, exercise, and cardiovascular health. Circ Res2019 Mar; 124: 799–815.
4.
YoungDRHivertMFAlhassanS, et al.Sedentary behavior and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality: A science advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation2016 Sep 27; 134: e262–e279.
5.
PenichePDCAguiarLTReisMTFD, et al.The distance covered in field tests is more explained by walking capacity than by cardiorespiratory fitness after stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis2021 Sep; 30: 105995.
6.
NascimentoLRBoeningAGalliA, et al.Treadmill walking improves walking speed and distance in ambulatory people after stroke and is not inferior to overground walking: A systematic review. J Physiother2021 Apr; 67: 95–104.
7.
BillingsleyHRodriguez-MiguelezPDel BuonoMG, et al.Lifestyle interventions with a focus on nutritional strategies to increase cardiorespiratory fitness in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, obesity, sarcopenia, and frailty. Nutrients2019 Nov 21; 11: 2849.
8.
MotlRWBairdJF. Cardiorespiratory fitness and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in older adults with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin2021; 7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/20552173211057514
9.
O'DonoghueGBlakeCCunninghamC, et al.What exercise prescription is optimal to improve body composition and cardiorespiratory fitness in adults living with obesity? A network meta-analysis. Obes Rev2021 Feb; 22: e13137.
10.
de RezendeLFRodrigues LopesMRey-LópezJP, et al.Sedentary behavior and health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews. PLoS One2014 Aug 21; 9: e105620.
11.
RossRBlairSNArenaR, et al.Importance of assessing cardiorespiratory fitness in clinical practice: a case for fitness as a clinical vital sign: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation2016 Dec 13; 134: e653–e699.
12.
American Thoracic Society; American College of Chest Physicians. ATS/ACCP Statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing. American Journal Of Respiratory And Critical Care Medicine, [S.L.]15 jan. 2003; 167: 211–277. American Thoracic Society. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.167.2.211.
13.
AdachiH. Cardiopulmonary exercise test. Int Heart J2017 Oct 21; 58: 654–665.
14.
Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia. III Diretrizes da sociedade brasileira de cardiologia sobre teste ergométrico [III guidelines of sociedade brasileira de cardiologia on the exercise test]. Arq Bras Cardiol2010; 95: 1–26. Portuguese.
15.
ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS Statement: Guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2002 Jul 1; 166: 111–117. Erratum in: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 May 15;193(10):1185.
16.
PollentierBIronsSLBenedettoCM, et al.Examination of the six minute walk test to determine functional capacity in people with chronic heart failure: Aa systematic review. Cardiopulm Phys Ther J2010 Mar; 21: 13–21. PMID: 20467515; PMCID: PMC2845244.
17.
BelletRNAdamsLMorrisNR. The 6-min walk test in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation: validity, reliability and responsiveness—a systematic review. Physiotherapy2012 Dec; 98: 277–286.
18.
BernardPRomainAJVancampfortD, et al.Six minutes walk test for individuals with schizophrenia. Disabil Rehabil2015; 37: 921–927.
19.
HollandAESpruitMATroostersT, et al.An official European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society technical standard: field walking tests in chronic respiratory disease. Eur Respir J2014 Dec; 44: 1428–1446.
20.
MacchiavelliAGiffoneAFerrarelloF,et al.Reliability of the six-minute walk test in individuals with stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol Sci2021 Jan; 42: 81–87.
21.
FulkGDEchternachJL. Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of gait speed in individuals undergoing rehabilitation after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther2008 Mar; 32: 8–13.
22.
PessoaBVArcuriJFLabadessaIG, et al.Validity of the six-minute step test of free cadence in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Braz J Phys Ther2014 May-Jun; 18: 228–236.
23.
FranciscoDSMartinezLTerrazasAC, et al.Six-minute stepper test in hospitalized elderly patients: convergent validity, test-retest reliability and safety. PLoS One2020 Oct 29; 15: e0241372.
24.
BiscaGWMoritaAAHernandesNA, et al.Simple lower limb functional tests in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2015 Dec; 96: 2221–2230.
25.
VilarinhoRCaneirasCMontesAM. Measurement properties of step tests for exercise capacity in COPD: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil2021; 35: 578–588.
26.
TravensoloCFArcuriJFPolitoMD. Validity and reliability of the 6-min step test in individuals with coronary artery disease. Physiother Res Int2020 Jan; 25: e1810.
27.
MarinhoRSJürgensenSPArcuriJF, et al.Reliability and validity of six-minute step test in patients with heart failure. Braz J Med Biol Res2021 Jul 16; 54: e10514.
28.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br Med J2021 Mar 29; 372: 71.
29.
PrinsenCACMokkinkLBBouterLM, et al.COSMIN Guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res2018 May; 27: 1147–1157.
30.
MokkinkLBde VetHCWPrinsenCAC, et al.COSMIN Risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res2018 May; 27: 1171–1179.
31.
TerweeCBMokkinkLBKnolDL, et al.Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res2012 May; 21: 651–657.
32.
American Thoracic Society; American College of Chest Physicians. ATS/ACCP Statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2003; 167: 211–277. doi:https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.167.2.211
33.
MokkinkLBTerweeCBPatrickDL, et al.The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res2010 May; 19: 539–549.
34.
MunroBH. Statistical methods for health care research. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005.
35.
BalshemHHelfandMSchünemannHJ, et al.GRADE Guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol2011 Apr; 64: 401–406.
36.
da CostaJNArcuriJFGonçalvesIL, et al.Reproducibility of cadence-free 6-min step test in subjects with COPD. Respir Care2014 Apr; 59: 538–542.
37.
FabreCChehereBBartF, et al.Relationships between heart rate target determined in different exercise testing in COPD patients to prescribed with individualized exercise training. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis2017 May 16; 12: 1483–1489.
38.
GrosboisJMRiquierCChehereB, et al.Six-minute stepper test: A valid clinical exercise tolerance test for COPD patients. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis2016 Mar 29; 11: 657–663.
39.
PessoaBVJamamiMBassoRP, et al.Teste do degrau e teste da cadeira: Comportamento das respostas metábolo-ventilatórias e cardiovasculares na DPOC. Fisioter mov2012 Jan; 25: 105–115.
40.
PichonRCouturaudFMialonP, et al.Responsiveness and minimally important difference of the 6-Minute stepper test in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respiration2016; 91: 367–373.
41.
CarvalhoLPDi Thommazo-LuporiniLAubertin-LeheudreM, et al.Prediction of cardiorespiratory fitness by the six-Minute step test and its association with muscle strength and power in sedentary obese and lean young women: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One2015 Dec 30; 10: e0145960.
42.
Di Thommazo-LuporiniLPinheiro CarvalhoLLuporiniR, et al.The six-minute step test as a predictor of cardiorespiratory fitness in obese women. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med2015 Dec; 51: 793–802.
43.
FagundesCFThommazo-LuporiniLDGoulartCL, et al.Reference equations of oxygen uptake for the step test in the obese population. Braz J Med Biol Res2022 Mar 21; 55: e11864.
44.
ChavesSIDMagalhãesMGSRibeiroASV, et al.O CPAP atenua as respostas cardiovasculares ao esforço submáximo na apneia obstrutiva do sono? Um estudo transversal. Research, Society and Development2021; 10: e45710615941.
45.
MagalhãesMGSTeixeiraJBSantosAMB, et al.Construct validity and reproducibility of the six-minute step test in subjects with obstructive sleep apnea treated with continuous positive airway pressure. J Bras Pneumol2020 Apr 22; 46: e20180422.
46.
BoujibarFGillibertABonnevieT, et al.The 6-min stepper test and the sit-to-stand test predict complications after major pulmonary resection via minimally invasive surgery: a prospective inception cohort study. J Physiother2022 Apr; 68: 130–135.
47.
da SilvaTDRaimundoRDFerreiraC, et al.Comparison between the six-minute walk test and the six-minute step test in post stroke patients. Int Arch Med2013 Aug 7; 6: 31.
48.
RittLEFDarzéESFeitosaGF, et al.The six-Minute step test as a predictor of functional capacity according to peak VO2 in cardiac patients. Arq Bras Cardiol2021 May; 116: 889–895. English, Portuguese..
49.
HamiltonDMHaennelRG. Validity and reliability of the 6-min walk test in a cardiac rehabilitation population. J Cardiopulm Rehabil2000; 20: 156–164.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
