To evaluate the effect of preventive interventions for lateral ankle sprain in the general population.
Data sources
A search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Medline, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted up to August 2022.
Review methods
Randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies that evaluated any interventions for preventing lateral ankle sprain were included. Two reviewers independently conducted the search, screening, and data extraction. The methodological quality of each study was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials or using the Cochrane Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies tool for prospective cohort studies.
Results
Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. Proprioceptive training exhibited better effects on preventing future lateral ankle sprain compared with the control group (risk ratio = 0.59, p < 0.001), and a stronger preventive effect was observed in participants with a history of lateral ankle sprain in the subgroup analysis (risk ratio = 0.49, p = 0.02). Compared with no bracing, ankle bracing had no significant better effect in preventing lateral ankle sprain (risk ratio = 0.43, p = 0.05). Proprioceptive training and ankle bracing had similar preventive effects (risk ratio = 0.98, p = 0.97). Limited evidence hindered the synthesis of data on pain, swelling, costs, and time loss.
Conclusion
Proprioceptive training is recommended for preventing lateral ankle sprain, especially for people with a history of lateral ankle sprain. Bracing seems to have an ambiguous preventive effect and requires more further investigation.
GribblePABleakleyCMCaulfieldBM, et al. Evidence review for the 2016 International Ankle Consortium consensus statement on the prevalence, impact and long-term consequences of lateral ankle sprains. Br J Sports Med2016; 50: 1496–1505.
2.
DohertyCDelahuntECaulfieldB, et al. The incidence and prevalence of ankle sprain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies. Sports Med2014; 44: 123–140.
3.
FongDTHongYChanLK, et al. A systematic review on ankle injury and ankle sprain in sports. Sports Med2007; 37: 73–94.
4.
BridgmanSAClementDDowningA, et al. Population based epidemiology of ankle sprains attending accident and emergency units in the West Midlands of England, and a survey of UK practice for severe ankle sprains. Emerg Med J2003; 20: 508–510.
Hubbard-TurnerT. Lack of medical treatment from a medical professional after an ankle sprain. J Athl Train2019; 54: 671–675.
7.
McKayGDGoldiePPayneWR, et al. Ankle injuries in basketball: injury rate and risk factors. Br J Sports Med2001; 35: 103–108.
8.
BielskaIAWangXLeeR, et al. The health economics of ankle and foot sprains and fractures: a systematic review of English-language published papers. Part 2: the direct and indirect costs of injury. Foot2019; 39: 115–121.
9.
van RijnRMvan OsAGBernsenRM, et al. What is the clinical course of acute ankle sprains? A systematic literature review. Am J Med2008; 121: 324–331.
10.
KonradsenLBechLEhrenbjergM, et al. Seven years follow-up after ankle inversion trauma. Scand J Med Sci Sports2002; 12: 129–135.
11.
AnandacoomarasamyABarnsleyL. Long term outcomes of inversion ankle injuries. Br J Sports Med2005; 39: e14.
12.
GribblePADelahuntEBleakleyC, et al. Selection criteria for patients with chronic ankle instability in controlled research: a position statement of the International Ankle Consortium. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther2013; 43: 585–591.
13.
TanenLDochertyCLVan Der PolB, et al. Prevalence of chronic ankle instability in high school and division I athletes. Foot Ankle Spec2014; 7: 37–44.
14.
HillerCENightingaleEJRaymondJ, et al. Prevalence and impact of chronic musculoskeletal ankle disorders in the community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2012; 93: 1801–1807.
15.
VerhagenRAde KeizerGvan DijkCN. Long-term follow-up of inversion trauma of the ankle. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg1995; 114: 92–96.
16.
HandollHHGRoweBHQuinnKM, et al. Interventions for preventing ankle ligament injuries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2011; 5: CD000018.
17.
DohertyCBleakleyCDelahuntE, et al. Treatment and prevention of acute and recurrent ankle sprain: an overview of systematic reviews with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med2017; 51: 113–125.
18.
LysdalFGBandholmTTolstrupJS, et al. Does the Spraino low-friction shoe patch prevent lateral ankle sprain injury in indoor sports? A pilot randomised controlled trial with 510 participants with previous ankle injuries. Br J Sports Med2021; 55: 92–98.
19.
Van ReijenMVriendIZuidemaV, et al. The “Strengthen your ankle” program to prevent recurrent injuries: a randomized controlled trial aimed at long-term effectiveness. J Sci Med Sport2017; 20: 549–554.
20.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg2010; 8: 336–341.
21.
SterneJASavovićJPageMJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Br Med J2019; 366: i4898.
22.
SterneJAHernánMAReevesBC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. Br Med J2016; 355: i4919.
23.
HigginsJPTThomasJChandlerJ, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester. UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2019.
24.
HigginsJPTThompsonSGDeeksJJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br Med J2003; 327: 557–560.
25.
AmorosoPJRyanJBBickleyB, et al. Braced for impact: reducing military paratroopers’ ankle strains using outside-the-boot braces. J Trauma1998; 45: 575–580.
26.
ClelandJAMintkenPMcDevittA, et al. Manual physical therapy and exercise versus supervised home exercise in the management of patients with inversion ankle sprain: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther2013; 43: 443–455.
27.
De BieRADe VetHCLenssenTF, et al. Low-level laser therapy in ankle sprains: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1998; 79: 1415–1420.
28.
EiffMPSmithATSmithGE. Early mobilization versus immobilization in the treatment of lateral ankle sprains. Am J Sports Med1994; 22: 83–88.
29.
FreyCFederKSSleightJ. Prophylactic ankle brace use in high school volleyball players: a prospective study. Foot Ankle Int2010; 31: 296–300.
30.
HolmeEMagnussonSPBecherK, et al. The effect of supervised rehabilitation on strength, postural sway, position sense and re-injury risk after acute ankle ligament sprain. Scand J Med Sci Sports1999; 9: 104–109.
31.
HupperetsMDWVerhagenEALvan MechelenW. Effect of unsupervised home based proprioceptive training on recurrences of ankle sprain: randomised controlled trial. Br Med J2009; 339: b2684–b2684.
32.
JanssenKWvan MechelenWVerhagenEA. Bracing superior to neuromuscular training for the prevention of self-reported recurrent ankle sprains: a three-arm randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med2014; 48: 1235–1239.
33.
MickelTJBottoniCRTsujiG, et al. Prophylactic bracing versus taping for the prevention of ankle sprains in high school athletes: a prospective, randomized trial. J Foot Ankle Surg2006; 45: 360–365.
34.
MohammadiF. Comparison of 3 preventive methods to reduce the recurrence of ankle inversion sprains in male soccer players. Am J Sports Med2007; 35: 922–926.
35.
SitlerMRyanJWheelerB, et al. The efficacy of a semirigid ankle stabilizer to reduce acute ankle injuries in basketball. A randomized clinical study at West Point. Am J Sports Med1994; 22: 454–461.
36.
StasinopoulosDStasinopoulosD. Comparison of three preventive methods in order to reduce the incidence of ankle inversion sprains among female volleyball players. Br J Sports Med2004; 38: 182–185.
37.
van RijnRMvan OsAGKleinrensinkG-J, et al. Supervised exercises for adults with acute lateral ankle sprain: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract2007; 57: 793–800.
38.
VerhagenEVan Der BeekATwiskJ, et al. The effect of a proprioceptive balance board training program for the prevention of ankle sprains: a prospective controlled trial. Am J Sports Med2004; 32: 1385–1393.
39.
WesterJUJespersenSMNielsenKD, et al. Wobble board training after partial sprains of the lateral ligaments of the ankle: a prospective randomized study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther1996; 23: 332–336.
40.
VerhagenEAvan TulderMvan der BeekAJ, et al. An economic evaluation of a proprioceptive balance board training programme for the prevention of ankle sprains in volleyball. Br J Sports Med2005; 39: 111–115.
41.
de VasconcelosGSCiniASbruzziG, et al. Effects of proprioceptive training on the incidence of ankle sprain in athletes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil2018; 32: 1581–1590.
42.
SchiftanGSRossLAHahneAJ. The effectiveness of proprioceptive training in preventing ankle sprains in sporting populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport2015; 18: 238–244.
43.
McGuineTAKeeneJS. The effect of a balance training program on the risk of ankle sprains in high school athletes. Am J Sports Med2006; 34: 1103–1111.
44.
BleakleyCMTaylorJBDischiaviSL, et al. Rehabilitation exercises reduce reinjury post ankle sprain, but the content and parameters of an optimal exercise program have yet to be established: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2019; 100: 1367–1375.
45.
DizonJMReyesJJ. A systematic review on the effectiveness of external ankle supports in the prevention of inversion ankle sprains among elite and recreational players. J Sci Med Sport2010; 13: 309–317.
46.
EnriqueE. Addiction to new technologies and to online social networking in young people: a new challenge. Adicciones2010; 22: 91–95.
47.
SchüzJ. Mobile phone use and exposures in children. Bioelectromagnetics2005; 26: S45–S50.
48.
HermansJJBeumerAde JongTA, et al. Anatomy of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis in adults: a pictorial essay with a multimodality approach. J Anat2010; 217: 633–645.
GerberJPWilliamsGNScovilleCR, et al. Persistent disability associated with ankle sprains: a prospective examination of an athletic population. Foot Ankle Int1998; 19: 653–660.
51.
HerzogMMKerrZYMarshallSW, et al. Epidemiology of ankle sprains and chronic ankle instability. J Athl Train2019; 54: 603–610.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
