Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2023-4
Myofascial release for the treatment of pain and dysfunction in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
To explore the effects of myofascial release (MFR) on pain and dysfunction in individuals with chronic mechanical neck pain (MNP).
Data sources
PubMed, Embase, Medline, Wiley Online Library, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data, and the Cochrane Library were searched until 12 September 2022.
Review methods
This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022302485). Methodological quality was assessed using Cochrane risk of bias assessment, and the quality of the evidence followed the GRADE recommendation. The outcomes pain, cervical mobility (Flexion, Extension, Rotation, lateral flexion), trapezius and suboccipital pressure pain thresholds (PPT), neck disability index (NDI), and adverse effects were extracted.
Results
After screening of 346 studies, 13 studies and 601 participants met the inclusion criteria. All studies were of moderate methodological quality. Compared with the control group, the participants in the MFR group showed significantly greater improvements trapezius PPT SMD 0.41 (95% CI 0.11–0.72), suboccipital PPT SMD 0.47 (95% CI 0.21–0.72), respectively. The differences were not significant to support the MFR treatment on pain, flexion, extension, rotation, lateral flexion angle, and NDI. None of the studies reported any adverse events.
Conclusion
This systematic review suggests that MFR is an effective treatment for the improvement of PPT of trapezius and suboccipital muscle in patients with chronic MNP. However, there is low to moderate evidence and may change over time.
JagadevanMMohanakrishnanBBhavananiAB, et al.Additive effect of “Brahma Mudra” on pain, proprioception and functional abilities in non-specific mechanical neck pain. J Bodyw Mov Ther2021; 27: 717–722.
2.
SafiriSKolahiAAHoyD, et al.Global, regional, and national burden of neck pain in the general population, 1990–2017: systematic analysis of the global burden of disease study 2017. Br Med J2020; 368: 791–802.
3.
KazeminasabSNejadghaderi SAAmiriP, et al.Neck pain: global epidemiology, trends and risk factors. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2022; 23: 26–39.
4.
González RuedaVLópez de CelisCBarra LópezME, et al.Effectiveness of a specific manual approach to the suboccipital region in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain and rotation deficit in the upper cervical spine: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2017; 18: 384–392.
5.
FejerRKyvikKOHartvigsenJ. The prevalence of neck pain in the world population: a systematic critical review of the literature. Eur Spine J2006; 15: 834–848.
6.
HoyDMarchLWoolfA, et al.The global burden of neck pain: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis2014; 73: 1309–1324.
7.
De PauwRCoppietersIKregelJ, et al.Does muscle morphology change in chronic neck pain patients? A systematic review. Man Ther2016; 22: 42–45.
8.
KashyapRIqbalAAlghadirAH. Controlled intervention to compare the efficacies of manual pressure release and the muscle energy technique for treating mechanical neck pain due to upper trapezius trigger points. J Pain Res2018; 11: 3151–3160.
9.
Rodríguez-FuentesIFrancisco JavierDTRodríguez-FuentesG, et al.Myofascial release therapy in the treatment of occupational mechanical neck pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2016; 95: 507–515.
10.
SwetaVGPeeyooshaVG. A randomized controlled trial to study the effect of gross myofascial release on mechanical neck pain referred to upper limb. Int J Health Sci2018; 12: 51–59.
11.
WongJJCôtéPAmeisA, et al.Are non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs effective for the management of neck pain and associated disorders, whiplash-associated disorders, or non-specific low back pain? A systematic review of systematic reviews by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) collaboration. Eur Spine J2016; 25: 34–61.
12.
VanDYuHPauldenM, et al.Which interventions are cost-effective for the management of whiplash-associated and neck pain-associated disorders? A systematic review of the health economic literature by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) collaboration. Spine J2015; 16: 1582–1597.
13.
Mesa-JiménezJALozano-LópezCAngulo-Díaz-ParreoS, et al.Multimodal manual therapy vs. pharmacological care for management of tension type headache: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Cephalalgia2015; 35: 1323–1332.
14.
LaimiKMäkiläABärlundE, et al.Effectiveness of myofascial release in treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil2018; 32: 440–450.
15.
López-TorresOMon-LópezDGomis-MarzáC, et al.Effects of myofascial release or self-myofascial release and control position exercises on lower back pain in idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review. J Bodyw Mov Ther2021; 27: 16–25.
16.
CorumMAydinTCeylanCM, et al.The comparative effects of spinal manipulation, myofascial release and exercise in tension-type headache patients with neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Complement Ther Clin Pract2021; 43: 1–8.
17.
Rodríguez-HuguetMGil-SalúJLRodríguez-HuguetP, et al.Effects of myofascial release on pressure pain thresholds in patients with neck pain: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2017; 97: 16–22.
18.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg2010; 8: 336–341.
19.
BarcotOBoricMPericicTP, et al.Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane Systematic Reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook. BMC Med Res Methodol2019; 19: 170–180.
20.
HigginsJPTAltmanDGGøtzschePC, et al.The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Br Med J2011; 343: 1–9.
21.
HigginsJThompsonSGDeeksJJ, et al.Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. The cochrane collaboration. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Archiv für experimentelle Pathologie und Pharmakologie2008; 5: 38.
22.
ClarkeMOxmanA. Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.0. 2008.
23.
HigginsJPTGreenA. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. http://www.cochrane-handbook.org/
24.
NeumannIBrignardello-PetersenRWierciochW, et al.The GRADE evidence-to-decision framework: a report of its testing and application in 15 international guideline panels. Implement Sci2015; 11: 1–8.
25.
GuyattGOxmanADAklEA, et al.GRADE Guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings table. J Clin Epidemiol2011; 64: 383–394.
26.
BalshemHHelfandMSchünemannHJ, et al.GRADE Guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol2011; 64: 401–406.
27.
HguyattGDoxmanASultanS, et al.GRADE Guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol2011; 64: 1311–1316.
28.
RhpARapmBRhC, et al.Treatment of neck pain with myofascial therapies: a single blind randomized controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther2020; 2: 160–170.
29.
Pérez-MartínezCGogorza-ArroitaonandiaKHeredia-RizoAM, et al.INYBI: a new tool for self-myofascial release of the suboccipital muscles in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Spine2020; 45: E1367–E1375.
30.
JuanJARAlejandroFSJosé DavidTC, et al.Effects of instrumental, manipulative and soft tissue approaches for the suboccipital region in subjects with chronic mechanical neck pain. A randomized controlled trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health2021; 18: 8636–8350.
31.
KatrinBJacobiKSchmidtT. Fascial treatment versus manual therapy (HVLA) in patients with chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil2021; 15: 1–10.
32.
Rodríguez-HuguetMRodríguez-HuguetPRodríguez-AlmagroD, et al.Vacuum myofascial therapy device for non-specific neck pain. A single blind randomized clinical trial. Complement Ther Med2020; 52: 1–6.
33.
Cabrera-MartosIRodríguez-TorresJLópez-LópezL, et al.Effects of an active intervention based on myofascial release and neurodynamics in patients with chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Physiother Theory Pract2020; 38: 1145–1152.
34.
StievenFFFerreiraGEde AraújoFX, et al.Immediate effects of dry needling and myofascial release on local and widespread pressure pain threshold in individuals with active upper trapezius trigger points: a randomized clinical trial. J Manipulattive Physiol Ther2021; 44: 95–102.
35.
El-GendyMLasheenYRezkallaW. Multimodal approach of electrotherapy versus myofascial release in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Physiother Q2019; 27: 6–12.
36.
KhanZKAhmedSIBaigA, et al.Effect of post-isometric relaxation versus myofascial release therapy on pain, functional disability, rom and qol in the management of non-specific neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2022; 23: 1–11.
37.
JiaQ. The effect of myofascial release on chronic cervical pain is better than that of static traction. Jiyinzuxue Yu Yingyong Shengwuxue (Genomics Appl Biol)2018; 37: 5158–5164.
38.
SadriaGHosseiniMRezasoltaniA, et al.A comparison of the effect of the active release and muscle energy techniques on the latent trigger points of the upper trapezius. J Bodyw Mov Ther2016; 21: 920–937.
39.
LeeSNamDNamJ, et al.Efficacy and safety of myofascial-meridian release acupuncture (MMRA) for chronic neck pain: a study protocol for randomized,patient-and assessor-blinded,sham controlled trial. Bmc Complementary Altern Med2016; 16: 45–65.
40.
PetersenJABrauerCThygesenLC, et al.Prospective, population-based study of occupational movements and postures of the neck as risk factors for cervical disc herniation. BMJ Open2022; 12: 1–9.
41.
KamaliFMohamadiMFakheriL, et al.Dry needling versus friction massage to treat tension type headache: a randomized clinical trial. J Bodywork Mov Ther2019; 23: 89–93.
42.
CampeloNMeloCAAlbuquerque-SendinF, et al.Short- and medium-term effects of manual therapy on cervical active range of motion and pressure pain sensitivity in latent myofascial pain of the upper trapezius muscle: a randomized controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther2013; 36: 300–309.
43.
Castro SánchezAMLópezHGFernández SánchezM, et al.Improvement in clinical outcomes after dry needling versus myofascial release on pain pressure thresholds, quality of life, fatigue, pain intensity, quality of sleep, anxiety, and depression in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. Disabil Rehabil2019; 41: 2235–2246.
44.
CavanaughMTDöWelingAYoungJD, et al.An acute session of roller massage prolongs voluntary torque development and diminishes evoked pain. Eur J Appl Physiol2017; 117: 109–117.
45.
LaffayeGDa SilvaDTDelafontaineA. Self-myofascial release effect with foam rolling on recovery after high-intensity interval training. Front Physiol2019; 10: 1287–1296.
46.
Rodríguez-FuentesIFrancisco JavierDTRodríguez-FuentesG, et al.Is myofascial release therapy cost-effective when compared with manual therapy to treat workers’ mechanical neck pains?J Manipulative Physiol Ther2020; 43: 683–690.
47.
UluNYilmazKM, et al.Effects of pilates and yoga in patients with chronic neck pain: a sonographic study. J Rehabil Med2018; 50: 80–85.
48.
LucianaDACAnamariaJDiegoRS, et al.Effectiveness of the pilates method in the treatment of chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2018; 99: 1740–1746.
49.
DunleavyKKavaKGoldbergA, et al.Comparative effectiveness of pilates and yoga group exercise interventions for chronic mechanical neck pain: quasi-randomised parallel controlled study. Physiotherapy2016; 102: 236–242.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
