To evaluate the effectiveness of proprioceptive training on balance performance, trunk control, and gait speed in people with stroke.
Methods
We searched PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane, Embase, and Medline for randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effects of proprioceptive training for patients with stroke from the date of each database's inception to July 26, 2021. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts of potentially eligible articles that were identified on the basis of the search criteria. Methodological quality was determined using version 2 of the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials. Data were analyzed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. The treatment effect was estimated by calculating Hedges’ g and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed according to the I2 value. The primary outcome was balance performance and secondary outcomes were trunk control, gait speed, and basic functional mobility.
Results
In total, 17 trials involving 447 people with stroke were included. Proprioceptive training had a significant effect on balance performance (Hedges’ g = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.36–1.01), gait speed (Hedges’ g = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.19–0.94), trunk control (Hedges’ g = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.33–1.17), and basic functional mobility (Hedges’ g = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.31–0.94) among people with stroke.
Conclusion
Proprioceptive training may be effective in improving balance performance, gait speed, trunk control, and basic functional mobility among people with stroke.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BurkeRE. Sir Charles Sherrington’s the integrative action of the nervous system: a centenary appreciation. Brain: a Journal of Neurology2007; 130: 887–894.
2.
Hizli SayarGÜnübolH. Assessing proprioception. The Journal of Neurobehavioral Sciences2017; 4: 31–35. DOI: 10.5455/JNBS.1485955027.
3.
RandD. Proprioception deficits in chronic stroke-upper extremity function and daily living. PLoS One2018; 13: e0195043.
4.
RagnarsdottirM. The concept of balance. Physiotherapy1996; 82: 368–375.
5.
LesinskiMHortobágyiTMuehlbauerT, et al. Effects of balance training on balance performance in healthy older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med2015; 45: 1721–1738.
6.
Domínguez-NavarroFIgual-CamachoCSilvestre-MuñozA, et al. Effects of balance and proprioceptive training on total hip and knee replacement rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gait & Posture2018; 62: 68–74.
7.
AlwhaibiRMahmoudNBasheerM, et al. Impact of somatosensory training on neural and functional recovery of lower extremity in patients with chronic stroke: a single blind controlled randomized trial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health2021; 18: 583.
8.
KlingnerCMWitteOW. Chapter 9 – somatosensory deficits. In: VallarGCoslettHB (eds) Handbook of clinical neurology. Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2018, pp. 185–206.
9.
AmanJEElangovanNYehIL, et al. The effectiveness of proprioceptive training for improving motor function: a systematic review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience2014; 8: 1075.
10.
KynsburgAPánicsGHalasiT. Long-term neuromuscular training and ankle joint position sense. Acta Physiol Hung2010; 97: 183–191.
11.
HübscherMZechAPfeiferK, et al. Neuromuscular training for sports injury prevention: a systematic review. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise2010; 42: 413–421.
12.
HindleKBWhitcombTJBriggsWO, et al. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF): its mechanisms and effects on range of motion and muscular function. J Hum Kinet2012; 31: 105–113.
13.
SchiftanGSRossLAHahneAJ. The effectiveness of proprioceptive training in preventing ankle sprains in sporting populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport2015; 18: 238–244.
14.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 Statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ2021; 372: n71.
15.
SterneJACSavovićJPageMJ, et al. Rob 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ2019; 366: l4898.
16.
AhnEKangH. Introduction to systematic review and meta-analysis. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology2018; 71: 103–112.
17.
DuvalSTweedieR. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics2000; 56: 455–463.
18.
ChaeSHKimYLLeeSM. Effects of phase proprioceptive training on balance in patients with chronic stroke. Journal of Physical Therapy Science2017; 29: 839–844.
19.
ChoiYKNamCWLeeJH, et al. The effects of taping prior to PNF treatment on lower extremity proprioception of hemiplegic patients. Journal of Physical Therapy Science2013; 25: 1119–1122.
20.
HwangboPNDon KimK. Effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation neck pattern exercise on the ability to control the trunk and maintain balance in chronic stroke patients. Journal of Physical Therapy Science2016; 28: 850–853.
21.
JuniorVADSSantosMdSRibeiroNMdS, et al. Combining proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and virtual reality for improving sensorimotor function in stroke survivors: a randomized clinical trial. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis2019; 11: 1179573519863826–1179573519863826.
22.
KarthikbabuSNayakAVijayakumarK, et al. Comparison of physio ball and plinth trunk exercises regimens on trunk control and functional balance in patients with acute stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation2011; 25: 709–719.
23.
KhanalDSingaravelanRKhatriS. Effectiveness of pelvic proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation technique on facilitation of trunk movement in hemiparetic stroke patients. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences2013; 3: 29–37.
24.
KimBRKangTW. The effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation lower-leg taping and treadmill training on mobility in patients with stroke. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung Revue Internationale de Recherches de Readaptation2018; 41: 343–348.
25.
KimKLeeD-KJungS-I. Effect of coordination movement using the PNF pattern underwater on the balance and gait of stroke patients. Journal of Physical Therapy Science2015; 27: 3699–3701.
26.
SeoKCKimHA. The effects of ramp gait exercise with PNF on stroke patients’ dynamic balance. Journal of Physical Therapy Science2015; 27: 1747–1749.
27.
ChoKHLeeKJSongCH. Virtual-reality balance training with a video-game system improves dynamic balance in chronic stroke patients. Tohoku J Exp Med2012; 228: 69–74.
28.
KimC-HKimY-N. Effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and treadmill training on the balance and walking ability of stroke patients. J Kor Phys Ther2018; 30: 79–83.
29.
RibeiroTBrittoHOliveiraD, et al. Effects of treadmill training with partial body weight support and the proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation method on hemiparetic gait: a randomized controlled study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med2013; 49: 451–461.
30.
LiaoWCLaiCLHsuPS, et al. Different weight shift trainings can improve the balance performance of patients with a chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97: e13207.
31.
LynchEAHillierSLStillerK, et al. Sensory retraining of the lower limb after acute stroke: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2007; 88: 1101–1107.
32.
NohHJLeeSHBangDH. Three-dimensional balance training using visual feedback on balance and walking ability in subacute stroke patients: a single-blinded randomized controlled pilot trial. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases: the Official Journal of National Stroke Association2019; 28: 994–1000.
33.
PuckreeTNaidooP. Balance and stability-focused exercise program improves stability and balance in patients after acute stroke in a resource-poor setting. Pm r2014; 6: 1081–1087.
34.
DalalKKJoshuaAMNayakA, et al. Effectiveness of prowling with proprioceptive training on knee hyperextension among stroke subjects using videographic observation – a randomised controlled trial. Gait & Posture2018; 61: 232–237.
35.
SteultjensEMJDekkerJBouterLM, et al. Occupational therapy for stroke patients. Stroke2003; 34: 676–687.
36.
ByunSDJungTDKimCH, et al. Effects of the sliding rehabilitation machine on balance and gait in chronic stroke patients – a controlled clinical trial. Clinical Rehabilitation2011; 25: 408–415.
37.
YangSHwangWHTsaiYC, et al. Improving balance skills in patients who had stroke through virtual reality treadmill training. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation2011; 90: 969–978.
38.
AlghadirAHAl-EisaESAnwerS, et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of three scales for measuring balance in patients with chronic stroke. BMC Neurology2018; 18: 141.
39.
CanbekJFulkGNofL, et al. Test-retest reliability and construct validity of the Tinetti performance-oriented mobility assessment in people with stroke. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy: JNPT2013; 37: 14–19.
40.
TysonSFDeSouzaLH. Development of the Brunel balance assessment: a new measure of balance disability post stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation2004; 18: 801–810.
41.
BlumLKorner-BitenskyN. Usefulness of the berg balance scale in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Physical Therapy2008; 88: 559–566.
42.
DownsS. The Berg balance scale. Journal of Physiotherapy2015; 61: 46.
43.
KudlacMSabolJKaiserK, et al.Reliability and validity of the berg balance scale in the stroke population: a systematic review. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics2019; 37: 196–221.
44.
PollockCEngJGarlandS. Clinical measurement of walking balance in people post stroke: a systematic review. Clinical Rehabilitation2011; 25: 693–708.
45.
RechKDSalazarAPMarcheseRR, et al. Fugl-Meyer assessment scores are related with kinematic measures in people with chronic hemiparesis after stroke. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases: the Official Journal of National Stroke Association2020; 29: 104463.
46.
YamadaRIchinosawaYShimizuS, et al. Gait speed is a strong predictor of the ability to walk independently without wheelchair assistance in a facility setting for post-stroke patients. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine2018; 61: e218.
47.
EbenbichlerGROddssonLIKollmitzerJ, et al. Sensory-motor control of the lower back: implications for rehabilitation. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise2001; 33: 1889–1898.
48.
FieldDALivingstoneRW. Power mobility skill progression for children and adolescents: a systematic review of measures and their clinical application. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology2018; 60: 997–1011.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
