Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the effects of a group-based cognitive behavioural intervention for patients with persistent low back pain (LBP) and psychological risk factors referred to secondary care.

Design

A randomised controlled trial.

Setting

Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Denmark.

Subjects

A total of 136 participants with chronic LBP and psychological risk factors.

Interventions

Participants were randomised to the standard care group, including examination by a rheumatologist and/or a physiotherapist, or the intervention group, including standard care plus a multidisciplinary group-based pain management programme.

Main measures

Patient-reported outcomes were collected at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome was disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire). Secondary outcomes included low back pain intensity, pain catastrophising, health-related quality of life, and sick leave.

Results

Among 136 participants, 68 (mean age: 41.7 years (SD 11.8)) were randomised to standard care and 68 (mean age: 46.0 years (SD 10.8)) were randomised to the intervention group. Except for age, baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. 12-month follow-up was completed by 92.6% in the intervention group and 80.9% in the standard care group. Both groups achieved significant improvements on disability, with a reduction of −4.8 points (SD 6.1) in the intervention group compared to −3.7 points (SD 5.2), resulting in an insignificant difference between groups. No significant differences were found in the secondary outcomes.

Conclusion

A group-based pain management programme was no more effective than standard care for patients with persistent LBP and psychological risk factors.

Keywords

Low back pain rehabilitation interventions randomized controlled trial psychological factors disability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hartvigsen

Hancock

Kongsted

, et al. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet (London, England) 2018; 391: 2356–2367.

Waddell

. The back pain revolution. 2nd ed. United Kingdom: Churchill Livingstone, 2004.

Engel

. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science 1977; 196: 129–136.

Tagliaferri

Miller

Owen

, et al. Domains of chronic Low back pain and assessing treatment effectiveness: a clinical perspective. Pain Pract 2020; 20: 211–225.

Waddell

. A new clinical model for the treatment of low-back pain. Spine 1987; 12: 632–644.

Wertli

Burgstaller

Weiser

, et al. Influence of catastrophizing on treatment outcome in patients with nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review. Spine 2014; 39: 263–273.

Vlaeyen

JWS

Linton

. Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art. Pain 2000; 85: 317–332.

Kamper

Apeldoorn

Chiarotto

, et al. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 9: CD000963.

Linton

Shaw

. Impact of psychological factors in the experience of pain. Phys Ther 2011; 91: 700–711.

10.

Morsø

Kent

Albert

, et al.

Is the psychosocial profile of people with low back pain seeking care in danish primary care different from those in secondary care?

Man Ther 2013; 18: 54–59.

11.

Moore

. Chronic low back pain and psychosocial issues. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2010; 21: 801–815.

12.

Foster

Anema

Cherkin

, et al. Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions. Lancet (London, England) 2018; 391: 2368–2383.

13.

Oliveira

Maher

Pinto

, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview. Eur Spine J 2018; 27: 2791–2803.

14.

Salathe

Melloh

Crawford

, et al. Treatment efficacy, clinical utility, and cost-effectiveness of multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation treatments for persistent Low back pain: a systematic review. Global Spine J 2018; 8: 872–886.

15.

Richmond

Hall

Copsey

, et al. The effectiveness of cognitive behavioural treatment for Non-specific Low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one 2015; 10: e0134192.

16.

Baez

Hoch

. Evaluation of cognitive behavioral interventions and psychoeducation implemented by rehabilitation specialists to treat fear-avoidance beliefs in patients With Low back pain: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2018; 99: 2287–2298.

17.

Cheng

JOS

Cheng

Effectiveness of physical and cognitive-behavioural intervention programmes for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0223367.

18.

Skovbo

Agerbo

Jakobsen

, et al. Description of content, structure and theoretical model of a group-based pain management programme in the treatment of patients with persistent non-specific low back pain and psychological risk factors in a secondary sector setting. Clin Rehabil 2021; 35(8): 1077–1088.

19.

Moher

Hopewell

Schulz

, et al. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg 2012; 10: 28–55.

20.

Linton

Boersma

. Early identification of patients at risk of developing a persistent back problem: the predictive validity of the orebro musculoskeletal pain questionnaire. Clin J Pain 2003; 19: 80–86.

21.

Christensen

Fink

Toft

, et al. A brief case-finding questionnaire for common mental disorders: the CMDQ. Fam Pract 2005; 22: 448–457.

22.

Momsen

Jensen

Nielsen

, et al. Multiple somatic symptoms in employees participating in a randomized controlled trial associated with sickness absence because of nonspecific low back pain. Spine J 2014; 14: 2868–2876.

23.

Harris

Taylor

Thielke

, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42: 377–381.

24.

Roland

Morris

. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine 1983; 8: 141–144.

25.

Albert

Jensen

Dahl

, et al. Criteria validation of the roland morris questionnaire. A danish translation of the international scale for the assessment of functional level in patients with low back pain and sciatica. Ugeskr Laeger 2003; 165: 1875–1880.

26.

Manniche

Asmussen

Lauritsen

, et al. Low back pain rating scale: validation of a tool for assessment of low back pain. Pain 1994; 57: 317–326.

27.

Sullivan

MJL

Bishop

Pivik

. The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Psychol Assess 1995; 7: 524.

28.

EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16:199–208.

29.

Wittrup-Jensen

Lauridsen

Gudex

, et al. Generation of a danish TTO value set for EQ-5D health states. Scand J Public Health 2009; 37: 459–466.

30.

Rolving

Oestergaard

Willert

, et al. Description and design considerations of a randomized clinical trial investigating the effect of a multidisciplinary cognitive-behavioural intervention for patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014; 15: 62.

31.

Ris

Sogaard

Gram

, et al. Does a combination of physical training, specific exercises and pain education improve health-related quality of life in patients with chronic neck pain? A randomised control trial with a 4–month follow up. Man Ther 2016; 26: 132–140.

32.

Linton

Andersson

. Can chronic disability be prevented? A randomized trial of a cognitive-behavior intervention and two forms of information for patients with spinal pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25: 2825–2831. discussion 4.

33.

Lauridsen

Hartvigsen

Manniche

, et al. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006; 7.

34.

Monticone

Ambrosini

Rocca

, et al. Group-based task-oriented exercises aimed at managing kinesiophobia improved disability in chronic low back pain. Eur J Pain 2016; 20: 541–551.

35.

Monticone

Ferrante

Rocca

, et al. Effect of a long-lasting multidisciplinary program on disability and fear-avoidance behaviors in patients with chronic low back pain: results of a randomized controlled trial. Clin J Pain 2013; 29: 929–938.

36.

Smeets

Vlaeyen

Hidding

, et al. Active rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: cognitive-behavioral, physical, or both? First direct post-treatment results from a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN22714229]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006; 7: 5.

37.

Smeets

Vlaeyen

Kester

, et al. Reduction of pain catastrophizing mediates the outcome of both physical and cognitive-behavioral treatment in chronic low back pain. J Pain 2006; 7: 261–271.

38.

de Boer

Versteegen

Vermeulen

, et al. A randomized controlled trial of an internet-based cognitive-behavioural intervention for non-specific chronic pain: an effectiveness and cost-effectiveness study. Eur J Pain 2014; 18: 1440–1451.

39.

Pimm

Williams

Reay

, et al. An evaluation of a digital pain management programme: clinical effectiveness and cost savings. Br J Pain 2020; 14: 238–249.

40.

Hall

Richmond

Copsey

, et al. Physiotherapist-delivered cognitive-behavioural interventions are effective for low back pain, but can they be replicated in clinical practice? A systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 2018; 40: 1–9.

41.

Kjaer

Kongsted

Ris

, et al. GLA:d((R)) back group-based patient education integrated with exercises to support self-management of back pain - development, theories and scientific evidence. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2018; 19: 418–018–2334-x.

42.

Safiri

Kolahi

Cross

, et al. Prevalence, deaths, and disability-adjusted life years Due to musculoskeletal disorders for 195 countries and territories 1990–2017. Arthritis Rheumatol 2021; 73(4): 702–714.

43.

Mescouto

Olson

Hodges

, et al.

A critical review of the biopsychosocial model of low back pain care: time for a new approach?

Disabil Rehabil 2020; 7: 1–15.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.13 MB

Does group-based cognitive therapy improve functional ability,pain,catastrophic thoughts and quality of life in patients with persistent low back pain and psychological risk factors? A randomised controlled trial in a secondary care setting

Abstract

Objective

Design

Setting

Subjects

Interventions

Main measures

Results

Conclusion

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material