Letter to the editor concerning the article: “A prospective study to establish the minimal clinically important difference of the Mini-BESTest in individuals with stroke”
Restricted accessLetterFirst published online February, 2022
Letter to the editor concerning the article: “A prospective study to establish the minimal clinically important difference of the Mini-BESTest in individuals with stroke”
GanzDABaoYShekellePG, et al. Will my patient fall?JAMA2007; 297: 77–86.
2.
CaronniASciumèL.Is my patient actually getting better? Application of the McNemar test for demonstrating the change at a single subject level. Disabil Rehabil2017; 39: 1341–1347.
3.
MESA memo 62: measurement for social science and education: history of social science measurement, https://www.rasch.org/memo62.htm (accessed 26 June 2021).
4.
CaronniAPicardiMGilardoneG, et al. The McNemar change index worked better than the minimal detectable change in demonstrating the change at a single subject level. J Clin Epidemiol2021; 131: 79–88.
BeauchampMKNiebuhrRRocheP, et al. A prospective study to establish the minimal clinically important difference of the mini-BESTest in individuals with stroke. Clin Rehabil2021; 35: 1207–1215.
7.
GatchelRJLurieJDMayerTG.Minimal clinically important difference. Spine2010; 35: 1739–1743.
8.
TesioL.Outcome measurement in behavioural sciences: a view on how to shift attention from means to individuals and why. Int J Rehabil Res2012; 35: 1–12.
