To evaluate the effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave therapy compared with other interventions on pain, grip strength and disability in patients with lateral elbow tendinopathy.
We included randomized controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave therapy alone or as an additive intervention compared with sham or other interventions. Pain intensity, grip strength and elbow disability were used as primary outcome measures. We assessed methodological quality with the PEDro score and quality of evidence with the GRADE approach.
Results:
Twenty-seven studies with 1871 patients were finally included. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy reduced pain intensity at mid-term follow-up (standardized mean difference: −1.21, 95% confidence interval:−1.53, −0.89, P < 0.001) and improved grip strength at very short- (mean difference:3.92, 95% confidence interval: 0.91, 6.94, P = 0.01) and short-term follow-up (mean difference:4.87, 95% confidence interval:2.24, 7.50, P < 0.001) compared with sham treatment. However, no clinically significant results were found between comparators in all outcomes and follow-up times. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy presented clinically better compared to Laser in grip strength at short-term (mean difference:3.50, 95% confidence interval:2.40, 4.60, P < 0.001) and ultrasound in pain intensity at very-short-term follow-up (standardized mean difference: −1.54, 95% confidence interval: −2.60, −0.48, P = 0.005).
Conclusion:
Low to moderate certainty of evidence suggests that there are no clinical benefits of extracorporeal shockwave therapy compared to sham interventions or corticosteroid injections. Based on very-low and moderate certainty of evidence, extracorporeal shockwave therapy outperforms against Laser and ultrasound, respectively.
SandersTLMaradit KremersHBryanAJ, et al. The epidemiology and health care burden of tennis elbow: a population-based study. Am J Sports Med2015; 43(5): 1066–1071.
4.
HaahrJPAndersenJH.Physical and psychosocial risk factors for lateral epicondylitis: a population based case-referent study. Occup Environ Med2003; 60(5): 322–329.
5.
BissetLMVicenzinoB.Physiotherapy management of lateral epicondylalgia. J Physiother2015; 61(4): 174–181.
6.
CullinaneFLBoocockMGTrevelyanFC.Is eccentric exercise an effective treatment for lateral epicondylitis? A systematic review. Clin Rehabil2014; 28(1): 3–19.
7.
KaranasiosSKorakakisVWhiteleyR, et al. Exercise interventions in lateral elbow tendinopathy have better outcomes than passive interventions, but the effects are small: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 2123 subjects in 30 trials. Br J Sports Med2020; 2020: 102525.
8.
LianJMohamadiAChanJJ, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of nonsurgical treatment options for enthesopathy of the extensor carpi radialis brevis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. Am J Sports Med2018; 47(12): 3019–3029.
9.
KorakakisVWhiteleyRTzavaraA, et al. The effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in common lower limb conditions: a systematic review including quantification of patient-rated pain reduction. Br J Sports Med2018; 52(6): 387–407.
10.
StasinopoulosDJohnsonMI.Effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for tennis elbow (lateral epicondylitis). Br J Sports Med2005; 39(3): 132–136.
11.
BuchbinderRGreenSEYoudJM, et al. Shock wave therapy for lateral elbow pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2005; (4): CD003524.
12.
YaoGChenJDuanY, et al. Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BioMed Res Int2020; 2020: 2064781.
13.
ZhengCZengDChenJ, et al. Effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in patients with tennis elbow: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine2020; 99(30): e21189.
14.
HigginsJGreenS.Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
15.
BalshemHHelfandMSchünemannHJ, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol2011; 64(4): 401–406.
16.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med2009; 6(7): e1000097.
17.
OverendTJWuori-FearnJLKramerJF, et al. Reliability of a patient-rated forearm evaluation questionnaire for patients with lateral epicondylitis. J Hand Ther1999; 12(1): 31–37.
18.
StratfordPGillCWestawayM, et al. Assessing disability and change on individual patients: a report of a patient specific measure. Physiotherapy1995; 47(4): 258–263.
19.
StahlSKaufmanT.The efficacy of an injection of steroids for medial epicondylitis. A prospective study of sixty elbows. J Bone Joint Surg1997; 79(11): 1648–1652.
20.
HudakPLAmadioPCBombardierC.Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand). The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med1996; 29(6): 602–608.
21.
StratfordPLDLevyKMiseferiD, et al. Extensor carpi radialis tendonitis: a validation of selected outcome meaures. Burlington, MA: Scienceopen, 1987 pp.250–255.
22.
LiberatiAAltmanDGTetzlaffJ, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ2009; 339: b2700.
23.
VerhagenADe VetHBieR, et al. The delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by delphi consensus. J Clin Epidemiol1999; 51: 1235–1241.
24.
MacedoLGElkinsMRMaherCG, et al. There was evidence of convergent and construct validity of physiotherapy evidence database quality scale for physiotherapy trials. J Clin Epidemiol2010; 63(8): 920–925.
25.
MoseleyAMRahmanPWellsGA, et al. Agreement between the Cochrane risk of bias tool and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale: a meta-epidemiological study of randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions. PLoS One2019; 14(9): e0222770.
26.
FernandezMHartvigsenJFerreiraML, et al. Advice to stay active or structured exercise in the management of sciatica: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015; 40(18): 1457–1466.
27.
LemesÍRFerreiraPHLinaresSN, et al. Resistance training reduces systolic blood pressure in metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Sports Med2016; 50(23): 1438–1442.
28.
MachadoAFFerreiraPHMichelettiJK, et al. Can water temperature and immersion time influence the effect of cold water immersion on muscle soreness? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med2016; 46(4): 503–514.
29.
PoltawskiLWatsonT.Measuring clinically important change with the patient-rated tennis elbow evaluation. Hand Ther2011; 16(3): 52–57.
30.
BohannonRW.Minimal clinically important difference for grip strength: a systematic review. J Phys Ther Sci2019; 31(1): 75–78.
31.
DoddsRMSyddallHECooperR, et al. Grip strength across the life course: normative data from twelve British studies. PLoS One2014; 9(12): e113637.
32.
GüntherCMBürgerARickertM, et al. Grip strength in healthy caucasian adults: reference values. J Hand Surg2008; 33(4): 558–565.
33.
Luna-HerediaEMartín-PeñaGRuiz-GalianaJ.Handgrip dynamometry in healthy adults. Clin Nutr2005; 24(2): 250–258.
34.
Massy-WestroppNMGillTKTaylorAW, et al. Hand grip strength: age and gender stratified normative data in a population-based study. BMC Res Notes2011; 4: 127.
35.
ShimJHRohSYKimJS, et al. Normative measurements of grip and pinch strengths of 21st century korean population. Arch Plast Surg2013; 40(1): 52–56.
36.
AltunRDIncelNACimenOB, et al. Efficacy of ESWT for lateral epiconylitis treatment: comparison with physical therapy modalities. J Musculoskeletal Res2018; 21(1): 1850001.
37.
AydinAAticR.Comparison of extracorporeal shock-wave therapy and wrist-extensor splint application in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a prospective randomized controlled study. J Pain Res2018; 11: 1459–1467.
38.
BeyazalMSDevrimselG.Comparison of the effectiveness of local corticosteroid injection and extracorporeal shock wave therapy in patients with lateral epicondylitis. J Phys Ther Sci2015; 27(12): 3755–3758.
39.
CapanNEsmaeilzadehSOralA, et al. Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy is not more effective than placebo in the management of lateral epicondylitis: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2016; 95(7): 495–506.
40.
CelikDAnaforoglu KulunkogluB.Photobiomod-ulation therapy versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis. Photobio-modulation Photomed Laser Surg2019; 37(5): 269–275.
41.
ChungBWileyJP.Effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of previously untreated lateral epicondylitis: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med2004; 32(7): 1660–1667.
42.
CrowtherMAABannisterGCHumaH, et al. A prospective, randomised study to compare extracorporeal shock-wave therapy and injection of steroid for the treatment of tennis elbow. J Bone Joint Surg2002; 84(5): 678–679.
43.
DevrimselGKucukali TurkyilmazAYildirimM, et al. A comparison of laser and extracorporeal shock wave therapies in treatment of lateral epicondylitis. Türk Fiziksel Tip Rehabil Dergisi2014; 60(3): 194–198.
44.
EraslanLYuceDErbiliciA, et al. Does Kinesiotaping improve pain and functionality in patients with newly diagnosed lateral epicondylitis?Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc2017; 26: 1–8.
45.
GulerNSSarginSSahinN.Efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in patients with lateral epicondylitis: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. North Clin Istanbul2018; 5(4): 314–318.
46.
GunduzRMalasFUBormanP, et al. Physical therapy, corticosteroid injection, and extracorporeal shock wave treatment in lateral epicondylitis. Clinical and ultrasonographical comparison. Clin Rheumatol2012; 31(5): 807–812.
47.
HaakeMKönigIRDeckerT, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a randomized multicenter trial. J Bone Joint Surg2002; 84(11): 1982–1991.
48.
KubotAGrzegorzewskiASynderM, et al. Radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy and ultrasound therapy in the treatment of tennis elbow syndrome. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil2017; 19(5): 415–426.
49.
LizisP.Analgesic effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy versus ultrasound therapy in chronic tennis elbow. J Phys Ther Sci2015; 27(8): 2563–2567.
50.
MelikyanEYShahinEMilesJ, et al. Extracorporeal shock-wave treatment for tennis elbow. J Bone Joint Surg2003; 85-B(6): 852–855.
51.
OzturanKYucelICakiciH, et al. Autologous blood and corticosteroid injection and extracoporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis. Orthopedics2010; 33: 84–91.
52.
PettroneFAMcCallBR.Extracorporeal shock wave therapy without local anesthesia for chronic lateral epicondylitis. J Bone Joint Surg2005; 87(6): 1297–1304.
53.
RompeJDDeckingJSchoellnerC, et al. Repetitive low-energy shock wave treatment for chronic lateral epicondylitis in tennis players. Am J Sports Med2004; 32(3): 734–743.
54.
RompeJDHopeCKüllmerK, et al. Analgesic effect of extracorporeal shock-wave therapy on chronic tennis elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Br1996; 78(2): 233–237.
55.
Rezk-AllahSAbo-El AzmSNEl GendyAM.Extra corporeal shock wave therapy is superior to ultrasound in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis: an experimental study. J Med Res Pract2013; 2(7): 2016.
56.
SarkarBDasPGEquebalA, et al. Research report: efficacy of low-energy extracorporeal shockwave therapy and a supervised clinical exercise protocol for the treatment of chronic lateral epicondylitis: a randomised controlled study. Hong Kong Physiother J2013; 31: 19–24.
57.
SpaccaGNecozioneSCacchioA.Radial shock wave therapy for lateral epicondylitis: a prospective randomised controlled single-blind study. Eur Medicophys2005; 41(1): 17–25.
58.
SpeedCANicholsDRichardsC, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for lateral epicondylitis–a double blind randomised controlled trial. J Orthopaed Res2002; 20(5): 895–898.
59.
StaplesMPForbesAPtasznikR, et al. A randomized controlled trial of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow). J Rheumatol2008; 35(10): 2038–2046.
60.
WongCWNgEYFungPW, et al. Comparison of treatment effects on lateral epicondylitis between acupuncture and extracorporeal shockwave therapy. Asia-Pacific J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol2017; 7: 21–26.
61.
YalvacBMesciNGeler KulcuD, et al. Comparison of ultrasound and extracorporeal shock wave therapy in lateral epicondylosis. Acta Orthopaed Traumatol Turcica2018; 52(5): 357–362.
62.
YangTHHuangYCLauYC, et al. Efficacy of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy on lateral epicondylosis, and changes in the common extensor tendon stiffness with pretherapy and posttherapy in real-time sonoelastography: a randomized controlled study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2017; 96(2): 93–100.
63.
GagnierJJMoherDBoonH, et al. Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature. BMC Med Res Methodol2012; 12(1): 111.
64.
TakeshimaNSozuTTajikaA, et al. Which is more generalizable, powerful and interpretable in meta-analyses, mean difference or standardized mean difference?BMC Med Res Methodol2014; 14: 30.
65.
XiongYXueHZhouW, et al. Shock-wave therapy versus corticosteroid injection on lateral epicondylitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Phys Sports Med2019; 47(3): 284–289.
66.
CacchioAPaoloniMBarileA, et al. Effectiveness of radial shock-wave therapy for calcific tendinitis of the shoulder: single-blind, randomized clinical study. Phys Ther2006; 86(5): 672–682.
67.
SuraceSJDeitchJJohnstonRV, et al. Shock wave therapy for rotator cuff disease with or without calcification. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2020; (3): CD008962.
68.
KaranasiosSKorakakisVMoutzouriM, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of examination tests for lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET)- a systematic review. J Hand Ther. Epub ahead of print 27 February 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2021.02.002.
69.
OverdevestGMJacobsWVleggeert-LankampC, et al. Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2015; (3): CD010036.
70.
VicenzinoBde VosRJAlfredsonH.ICON 2019-International Scientific Tendinopathy Symposium Consensus: there are nine core health-related domains for tendinopathy (CORE DOMAINS): Delphi study of healthcare professionals and patients. Br J Sports Med2020; 54(8): 444–451.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
