Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective:

To investigate an intensive asynchronous computer-based treatment delivered remotely with clinician oversight to people with aphasia.

Design:

Single-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Setting:

Free-standing urban rehabilitation hospital.

Participants:

Adults with aphasia (at least six months post-onset).

Interventions:

Experimental treatment was Web ORLA^® (Oral Reading for Language in Aphasia) which provides repeated choral and independent reading aloud of sentences with a virtual therapist. Placebo was a commercially available computer game. Participants were instructed to practice 90 minutes/day, six days/week for six weeks.

Main measures:

Change in Language Quotient of the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised from pre-treatment to post-treatment and pre-treatment to six weeks following the end of treatment.

Results:

32 participants (19 Web ORLA^®, 13 Control) completed the intervention and post-treatment assessment; 27 participants (16 Web ORLA^®, 11 Control) completed the follow-up assessment six weeks after treatment had ended. Web ORLA^® treatment resulted in significant improvements in language performance from pre-treatment to immediately post-treatment (X = 2.96; SD = 4.32; P < 0.01; ES = 0.68) and from pre-treatment to six weeks following the end of treatment (X = 4.53; SD = 3.16; P < 0.001; ES = 1.43). There was no significant difference in the gain from pre-treatment to post-treatment for the Web ORLA^® versus Control groups. However, the Web ORLA^® group showed significantly greater gains at the six-week follow-up than the control group (X = 2.70; SD = 1.01; P = 0.013; ES = 1.92).

Conclusion:

Results provide evidence for improved language outcomes following intensive, web-based delivery of ORLA^® to individuals with chronic aphasia. Findings underscore the value of combining clinician oversight with the flexibility of asynchronous practice.

Keywords

Aphasia telerehabilitation computer treatment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Meltzer

Baird

Steele

, et al. Computer-based treatment of poststroke language disorders: a non-inferiority study of telerehabilitation compared to in-person service delivery. Aphasiology 2018; 32(3): 290–311.

Hall

Boisvert

Steele

Telepractice in the assessment and treatment of individuals with aphasia: a systematic review. IJT 2013; 5(1): 27.

Fitch

Cross

ST.

Telecomputer treatment for aphasia. J Speech Hear Disord 1983; 48(3): 335–336.

Helm-Estabrooks

Ramsberger

Aphasia treatment delivered by telephone. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986; 67(1): 51–53.

Lasker

Stierwalt

Spence

, et al. Using webcam interactive technology to implement treatment for severe apraxia: a case example. J Med Speech Lang Pathol 2010; 18(4): 71–77.

McGrath

Dowds

Jr Goldstein

Clinical supervision of a client with traumatic brain injury in a host home placement using video teleconferencing: a case study. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2008; 23(6): 388–393.

Goldberg

Haley

Jacks

. Script training and generalization for people with aphasia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2012; 21: 222–238.

Øra

Kirmess

Brady

, et al. The effect of augmented speech-language therapy delivered by telerehabilitation on poststroke aphasia: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2020; 34(3): 369–381.

Des Roches

Balachandran

Ascenso

, et al. Effectiveness of an impairment-based individualized rehabilitation program using an iPad-based software platform. Front Hum Neurosci 2015; 8: 1015.

10.

Palmer

Dimairo

Latimer

, et al. Computerised speech and language therapy or attention control added to usual care for people with long-term post-stroke aphasia: the Big CACTUS three-arm RCT. Health Technol Assess 2020; 24(19): 1.

11.

Palmer

Dimairo

Cooper

, et al. Self-managed, computerised speech and language therapy for patients with chronic aphasia post-stroke compared with usual care or attention control (Big CACTUS): a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2019; 18(9): 821–833.

12.

Cherney

Merbitz

Grip

JC.

Efficacy of oral reading in aphasia treatment outcome. Rehabil Lit 1986; 47(5–6): 112–118.

13.

Cherney

LR.

Efficacy of oral reading in the treatment of two patients with chronic Broca’s aphasia. Top Stroke Rehabil 1995; 2(1): 57–67.

14.

Cherney

LR.

Aphasia, alexia, and oral reading. Top Stroke Rehabil 2004; 11(1): 22–36.

15.

Gilmore

Dwyer

Kiran

Benchmarks of significant change after aphasia rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2019; 100(6): 1131–1139.e1187.

16.

Cherney

LR.

Oral reading for language in aphasia (ORLA): evaluating the efficacy of computer-delivered therapy in chronic nonfluent aphasia. Top Stroke Rehabil 2010; 17(6): 423–431.

17.

Kertesz

Western aphasia battery-revised. New York, NY: Harcourt Assessment Inc., 2007.

18.

Stark

Warburton

EA.

Improved language in chronic aphasia after self-delivered iPad speech therapy. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2018; 28(5): 818–831.

19.

Cherney

LR.

Oral reading for language in aphasia: impact of aphasia severity on cross-modal outcomes in chronic nonfluent aphasia. Semin Speech Lang 2010; 31(1): 42–51.

20.

Kiran

Meier

Johnson

JP.

Neuroplasticity in aphasia: a proposed framework of language recovery. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2019; 62(11): 3973–3985.

21.

Fama

Turkeltaub

PE.

Inner speech in aphasia: current evidence, clinical implications, and future directions. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2020; 29(1S): 560–573.

22.

Lee

Kocherginsky

Cherney

. Attention in individuals with aphasia: performance on the Conners’ Continuous Performance Test – 2nd edition. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2020; 30(2): 249–265.

23.

Villard

Kiran

To what extent does attention underlie language in aphasia?

Aphasiology 2017; 31(10): 1226–1245.

24.

Murray

LL.

Review attention and aphasia: theory, research and clinical implications. Aphasiology 1999; 13(2): 91–111.

25.

Hula

McNeil

MR.

Models of attention and dual-task performance as explanatory constructs in aphasia. Semin Speech Lang 2008; 29(3): 169–187.

26.

McNeil

Odell

Tseng

CH.

Toward the integration of resource allocation into a general theory of aphasia. Clin Aphasiology 1991; 20: 21–39.

27.

Lee

Sohlberg

Harn

, et al. Attention Process Training-3 to improve reading comprehension in mild aphasia: a single-case experimental design study. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2020; 30(3): 430–461.

28.

Peach

Nathan

Beck

KM.

Language-specific attention treatment for aphasia: description and preliminary findings. Semin Speech Lang 2017; 38: 5–16.

29.

Murray

Keeton

Karcher

Treating attention in mild aphasia: evaluation of attention process training-II. J Commun Disord 2006; 39(1): 37–61.

30.

Coelho

CA.

Direct attention training as a treatment for reading impairment in mild aphasia. Aphasiology 2005; 19(3–5): 3–5.

31.

Cherney

Kaye

Hitch

RS.

The best of both worlds: combining synchronous and asynchronous telepractice in the treatment of aphasia. Perspect Neurophysiol Neurogenic Speech Lang Disord 2011; 21(3): 83–93.

32.

Bhogal

Teasell

Speechley

Intensity of aphasia therapy, impact on recovery. Stroke 2003; 34(4): 987–993.

33.

Beeke

Beckley

Johnson

, et al. Conversation focused aphasia therapy: investigating the adoption of strategies by people with agrammatism. Aphasiology 2015; 29(3): 355–377.

34.

Damico

Tetnowski

Lynch

, et al. Facilitating authentic conversation: an intervention employing principles of constructivism and conversation analysis. Aphasiology 2015; 29(3): 400–421.

35.

Chapey

Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2014.

36.

Sohlberg

Mateer

CA.

Attention process training-3. Wake Forest: Lash & Associated Publishing/Training Inc., 2010.

37.

Kiran

Des Roches

Balachandran

, et al. Development of an impairment-based individualized treatment workflow using an iPad-based software platform. Semin Speech Lang 2014; 35: 38–50.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.10 MB

0.14 MB

Web-based Oral Reading for Language in Aphasia (Web ORLA ® ): A pilot randomized control trial

Abstract

Objective:

Design:

Setting:

Participants:

Interventions:

Main measures:

Results:

Conclusion:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material