(1) To identify baseline variables associated with patients that sought no additional care during the 12 months following a single self-management education session for low back pain (LBP), and (2) in those who sought care, to determine whether the same variables were associated with low versus high downstream LBP-related healthcare utilization.
Design:
An observational cohort.
Setting:
Single large military hospital.
Participants:
A total of 733 patients with LBP.
Intervention:
Single self-management education session.
Main outcomes:
Eleven variables were explored in two distinct logistic regression models: (1) no additional care versus additional care, and (2) low versus high number of additional visits in the additional care group.
Results:
In the first model, not being on active duty service (odds ratio (OR) = 1.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.37–2.86), low baseline disability (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.00–1.04), low baseline fear-avoidance related to work (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.00–1.03), and, in the last year, no opioid prescriptions (OR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.00–2.07), physical therapy (OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.00–2.65), or sleep disorder diagnosis (OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.05–2.51) significantly increased the odds that patients would not seek any additional care. In the second model, not being on active duty service (OR = 2.18, 95% CI = 1.38–3.46), low baseline disability (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.02–1.06), and no opioid prescriptions in the prior year (OR = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.42–3.37) increased the odds that patients would have less visits (⩽2 visits).
Conclusion:
Our study found several variables that helped determine whether patients would seek little or no additional care during the 12 months following a self-management education class for LBP.
ClewleyDRhonDFlynnT, et al. Health seeking behavior as a predictor of healthcare utilization in a population of patients with spinal pain. PLoS ONE2018; 13(8): e0201348.
2.
BairMJAngDWuJ, et al. Evaluation of Stepped Care for Chronic Pain (ESCAPE) in veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med2015; 175(5): 682–689.
3.
QaseemAWiltTJMcLeanRM, et al. Noninvasive treatments for acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med2017; 166(7): 514–530.
4.
National Guideline Centre. Low back pain and sciatica in over 16S: assessment and management. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Clinical Guidelines. London, 2016.
5.
HillJCWhitehurstDGLewisM, et al. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet2011; 378(9802): 1560–1571.
6.
FosterNEMullisRHillJC, et al. Effect of stratified care for low back pain in family practice (IMPaCT Back): a prospective population-based sequential comparison. Ann Fam Med2014; 12(2): 102–111.
7.
RhonDIClewleyDYoungJL, et al. Leveraging healthcare utilization to explore outcomes from musculoskeletal disorders: methodology for defining relevant variables from a health services data repository. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak2018; 18(1): 10.
8.
AtlasSJDeyoRA.Evaluating and managing acute low back pain in the primary care setting. J Gen Intern Med2001; 16(2): 120–131.
9.
StewartWFYanXBoscarinoJA, et al. Patterns of health care utilization for low back pain. J Pain Res2015; 8: 523–535.
10.
da C Menezes CostaLMaherCGHancockMJ, et al. The prognosis of acute and persistent low-back pain: a meta-analysis. CMAJ2012; 184(11): E613–E624.
11.
ShmagelAFoleyRIbrahimH.Epidemiology of chronic low back pain in US adults: data from the 2009-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)2016; 68(11): 1688–1694.
12.
BenchimolEISmeethLGuttmannA, et al. The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes2016; 115–116: 33–48.
13.
RhonDGreenleeTFritzJ.Utilization of manipulative treatment for spine and shoulder conditions between different medical providers in a large military hospital. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2018; 99(1): 72–81.
14.
KamperSJStantonTRWilliamsCM, et al. How is recovery from low back pain measured? A systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J2011; 20(1): 9–18.
15.
CookCELearmanKEO’HalloranBJ, et al. Which prognostic factors for low back pain are generic predictors of outcome across a range of recovery domains. Phys Ther2013; 93(1): 32–40.
16.
CohenSB.The concentration of health care expenditures and related expenses for costly medical conditions, 2012. Statistical brief (Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (US)). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2001.
17.
ClelandJAFritzJMBrennanGP.Predictive validity of initial fear avoidance beliefs in patients with low back pain receiving physical therapy: is the FABQ a useful screening tool for identifying patients at risk for a poor recovery. Eur Spine J2008; 17(1): 70–79.
18.
EriksenWNatvigBBruusgaardD.Sleep problems: a predictor of long-term work disability? A four-year prospective study. Scand J Public Health2001; 29(1): 23–31.
HarmsMCPeersCEChaseD.Low back pain: what determines functional outcome at six months? An observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2010; 11: 236.
21.
MellohMElferingAEgli PreslandC, et al. Identification of prognostic factors for chronicity in patients with low back pain: a review of screening instruments. Int Orthop2009; 33(2): 301–313.
22.
SteenstraIAVerbeekJHHeymansMW, et al. Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave in patients sick listed with acute low back pain: a systematic review of the literature. Occup Environ Med2005; 62(12): 851–860.
23.
WaddellGNewtonMHendersonI, et al. A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain1993; 52(2): 157–168.
24.
JohnsMW.A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Sleep1991; 14(6): 540–545.
25.
JohnsMW.Reliability and factor analysis of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Sleep1992; 15(4): 376–381.
26.
ChapmanJRNorvellDCHermsmeyerJT, et al. Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2011; 36(suppl. 21): s54–s68.
27.
WilliamsonE.Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Aust J Physiother2006; 52: 149.
28.
BennettDA.How can I deal with missing data in my study. Aust N Z J Public Health2001; 25(5): 464–469.
29.
DongYPengCY.Principled missing data methods for researchers. Springerplus2013; 2(1): 222.
30.
van SmedenMde GrootJAMoonsKG, et al. No rationale for 1 variable per 10 events criterion for binary logistic regression analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol2016; 16(1): 163.
31.
AustinPCSteyerbergEW.Events per Variable (EPV) and the relative performance of different strategies for estimating the out-of-sample validity of logistic regression models. Stat Methods Med Res2017; 26(2): 796–808.
32.
PeduzziPConcatoJKemperE, et al. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol1996; 49(12): 1373–1379.
33.
VatchevaKPLeeMMcCormickJB, et al. Multicollinearity in regression analyses conducted in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology (Sunnyvale)2016; 6(2): 227.
34.
ShenJGaoS.A solution to separation and multicollinearity in multiple logistic regression. J Data Sci2008; 6(4): 515–531.
35.
HarrellFE.Regression modeling strategies (as implemented in R Package “RMS” Version), Springer Series in Statistics, Second edition, 2014.
36.
BeckerAHeldHRedaelliM, et al. Low back pain in primary care: costs of care and prediction of future health care utilization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2010; 35(18): 1714–1720.
37.
DenningerTRCookCEChapmanCG, et al. The influence of patient choice of first provider on costs and outcomes: analysis from a physical therapy patient registry. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther2018; 48(2): 63–71.
38.
CotePBaldwinMLJohnsonWG.Early patterns of care for occupational back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2005; 30(5): 581–587.
39.
FritzJMBrennanGPHunterSJ, et al. Initial management decisions after a new consultation for low back pain: implications of the usage of physical therapy for subsequent health care costs and utilization. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2013; 94(5): 808–816.
40.
LentzTABeneciukJMGeorgeSZ.Prediction of healthcare utilization following an episode of physical therapy for musculoskeletal pain. BMC Health Serv Res2018; 18(1): 648.
41.
MortimerMAhlbergG; MUSIC-Norrtälje Study Group. To seek or not to seek? Care-seeking behaviour among people with low-back pain. Scand J Public Health2003; 31: 194–203.
42.
JelicSLe JemtelTH.Inflammation, oxidative stress, and the vascular endothelium in obstructive sleep apnea. Trends Cardiovasc Med2008; 18: 253–260.
43.
WangXOuyangYWangZ, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea and risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Int J Cardiol2013; 169(3): 207–214.
44.
RonksleyPEHemmelgarnBRHeitmanSJ, et al. Obstructive sleep apnoea is associated with diabetes in sleepy subjects. Thorax2009; 64(10): 834–839.
45.
GeurtsJWWillemsPCLockwoodC, et al. Patient expectations for management of chronic non-cancer pain: a systematic review. Health Expect2017; 20(6): 1201–1217.
46.
RobertsonAD.Let’s talk about the notion of cure. BMJ2019; 365: l2051.
47.
CareyTSEvansAHadlerN, et al. Care-seeking among individuals with chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)1995; 20(3): 312–317.
48.
Von KorffMLinEHFentonJJ, et al. Frequency and priority of pain patients’ health care use. Clin J Pain2007; 23(5): 400–408.
MoynihanRHenryDMoonsKG.Using evidence to combat overdiagnosis and overtreatment: evaluating treatments, tests, and disease definitions in the time of too much. PLoS Med2014; 11(7): e1001655.
51.
KarranELMcAuleyJHTraegerAC, et al. Can screening instruments accurately determine poor outcome risk in adults with recent onset low back pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med2017; 15: 13.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
