Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2019-8
Effectiveness of electrical stimulation therapy in improving arm function after stroke: a systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of electrical stimulation in arm function recovery after stroke.
Methods:
Data were obtained from the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus databases from their inception until 12 January 2019. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the effects of electrical stimulation on the recovery of arm function after stroke were selected.
Results:
Forty-eight RCTs with a total of 1712 patients were included in the analysis. The body function assessment, Upper-Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment, indicated more favorable outcomes in the electrical stimulation group than in the placebo group immediately after treatment (23 RCTs (n = 794): standard mean difference (SMD) = 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.51–0.84) and at follow-up (12 RCTs (n = 391): SMD = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.35–0.97). The activity assessment, Action Research Arm Test, revealed superior outcomes in the electrical stimulation group than those in the placebo group immediately after treatment (10 RCTs (n = 411): SMD = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.39–1.02) and at follow-up (8 RCTs (n = 289): SMD = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.34–1.52). Other activity assessments, including Wolf Motor Function Test, Box and Block Test, and Motor Activity Log, also revealed superior outcomes in the electrical stimulation group than those in the placebo group. Comparisons between three types of electrical stimulation (sensory, cyclic, and electromyography-triggered electrical stimulation) groups revealed no significant differences in the body function and activity.
Conclusion:
Electrical stimulation therapy can effectively improve the arm function in stroke patients.
NakayamaHJorgensenHSRaaschouHO, et al. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1994; 75(4): 394–398.
2.
PandyanADCameronMPowellJ, et al. Contractures in the post-stroke wrist: a pilot study of its time course of development and its association with upper limb recovery. Clin Rehabil2003; 17(1): 88–95.
3.
WilsonRDPageSJDelahantyM, et al. Upper-limb recovery after stroke: a randomized controlled trial comparing EMG-triggered, cyclic, and sensory electrical stimulation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2016; 30(10): 978–987.
4.
MiyasakaHOrandAOhnishiH, et al. Ability of electrical stimulation therapy to improve the effectiveness of robotic training for paretic upper limbs in patients with stroke. Med Eng Phys2016; 38(11): 1172–1175.
5.
ConfortoABFerreiroKNTomasiC, et al. Effects of somatosensory stimulation on motor function after subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2010; 24(3): 263–272.
6.
HsuSHuMWangY, et al. Dose-response relation between neuromuscular electrical stimulation and upper-extremity function in patients with stroke. Stroke2010; 41(4): 821–824.
7.
GharibNMAboumousaAMElowishyAA, et al. Efficacy of electrical stimulation as an adjunct to repetitive task practice therapy on skilled hand performance in hemiparetic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil2015; 29(4): 355–364.
8.
AmasyaliSYYalimanA.Comparison of the effects of mirror therapy and electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation on hand functions in stroke patients: a pilot study. Int J Rehabil Res2016; 39(4): 302–307.
9.
BarkerRBrauerSCarsonR.Training of reaching in stroke survivors with severe and chronic upper limb paresis using a novel nonrobotic device: a randomized clinical trial. Stroke2008; 39(6): 1800–1807.
10.
MeilinkAHemmenBSeelenHA, et al. Impact of EMG-triggered neuromuscular stimulation of the wrist and finger extensors of the paretic hand after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Rehabil2008; 22(4): 291–305.
11.
LauferYElboim-GabyzonM.Does sensory transcutaneous electrical stimulation enhance motor recovery following a stroke? A systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2011; 25(9): 799–809.
12.
VafadarAKCoteJNArchambaultPS.Effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation in improving clinical outcomes in the upper arm following stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int2015; 2015: 729768.
13.
HigginsJPTGreenS. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. London: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.
14.
LemmensRJTimmermansAAJanssen-PottenYJ, et al. Valid and reliable instruments for arm-hand assessment at ICF activity level in persons with hemiplegia: a systematic review. BMC Neurol2012; 12: 21.
15.
WoytowiczEJRietschelJCGoodmanRN, et al. Determining levels of upper extremity movement impairment by applying a cluster analysis to the Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2017; 98(3): 456–462.
16.
WuCSeoHCohenLG.Influence of electric somatosensory stimulation on paretic-hand function in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2006; 87(3): 351–357.
17.
KimberleyTJLewisSMAuerbachEJ, et al. Electrical stimulation driving functional improvements and cortical changes in subjects with stroke. Exp Brain Res2004; 154(4): 450–460.
18.
De KroonJRIJzermanMJ. Electrical stimulation of the upper extremity in stroke: cyclic versus EMG-triggered stimulation. Clin Rehabil2008; 22(8): 690–697.
19.
ChurchCPriceCPandyanA, et al. Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation to the shoulder after acute stroke. Stroke2006; 37(12): 2995–3001.
20.
CauraughJKimS.Two coupled motor recovery protocols are better than one: electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation and bilateral movements. Stroke2002; 33(6): 1589–1594.
21.
PanLHYangWWKaoCL, et al. Effects of 8-week sensory electrical stimulation combined with motor training on EEG-EMG coherence and motor function in individuals with stroke. Sci Rep2018; 8(1): 9217.
22.
KimTInTChoHY.Task-related training combined with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation promotes upper limb functions in patients with chronic stroke. Tohoku J Exp Med2013; 231(2): 93–100.
23.
TekeogluYAdakBGoksoyT.Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on Barthel Activities of Daily Living (ADL) index score following stroke. Clin Rehabil1998; 12(4): 277–280.
24.
Sentandreu ManoTSalom TerradezJRTomasJM, et al. Electrical stimulation in the treatment of the spastic hemiplegic hand after stroke: A randomized study. Med Clin2011; 137(7): 297–301.
25.
CuiBJWangDQQiuJQ, et al. Effects of a 12-hour neuromuscular electrical stimulation treatment program on the recovery of upper extremity function in sub-acute stroke patients: a randomized controlled pilot trial. J Phys Ther Sci2015; 27(7): 2327–2331.
26.
FlemingMSorinolaIRoberts-LewisS, et al. The effect of combined somatosensory stimulation and task-specific training on upper limb function in chronic stroke: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2015; 29(2): 143–152.
27.
KlaiputAKitisomprayoonkulW.Increased pinch strength in acute and subacute stroke patients after simultaneous median and ulnar sensory stimulation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2009; 23(4): 351–356.
28.
HaraYOgawaSTsujiuchiK, et al. A home-based rehabilitation program for the hemiplegic upper extremity by power-assisted functional electrical stimulation. Disabil Rehabil2008; 30(4): 296–304.
29.
SullivanJHurleyDHedmanL.Afferent stimulation provided by glove electrode during task-specific arm exercise following stroke. Clin Rehabil2012; 26(11): 1010–1020.
30.
SondeLKalimoHFernaeusS, et al. Low TENS treatment on post-stroke paretic arm: a three-year follow-up. Clin Rehabil2000; 14(1): 14–19.
31.
Dos Santos-FontesRLFerreirodeAndradeKNSterrA, et al. Home-based nerve stimulation to enhance effects of motor training in patients in the chronic phase after stroke: a proof-of-principle study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2013; 27(6): 483–490.
32.
HemmenBSeelenHA.Effects of movement imagery and electromyography-triggered feedback on arm-hand function in stroke patients in the subacute phase. Clin Rehabil2007; 21(7): 587–594.
33.
ThorsenRCortesiMJonsdottirJ, et al. Myoelectrically driven functional electrical stimulation may increase motor recovery of upper limb in poststroke subjects: a randomized controlled pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev2013; 50(6): 785–794.
34.
BoyaciATopuzOAlkanH, et al. Comparison of the effectiveness of active and passive neuromuscular electrical stimulation of hemiplegic upper extremities: a randomized, controlled trial. Int J Rehabil Res2013; 36(4): 315–322.
35.
ChaeJBethouxFBohineT, et al. Neuromuscular stimulation for upper extremity motor and functional recovery in acute hemiplegia. Stroke1998; 29(5): 975–979.
36.
ZhouMLiFLuW, et al. Efficiency of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and transcutaneous nerve stimulation on hemiplegic shoulder pain: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2018; 99(9): 1730–1739.
37.
SantistebanLTeremetzMBletonJP, et al. Upper limb outcome measures used in stroke rehabilitation studies: a systematic literature review. PLoS ONE2016; 11(5): e0154792.
38.
Tarvonen-SchroderSLaimiKKaukoT, et al. Concepts of capacity and performance in assessment of functioning amongst stroke survivors: a comparison of the functional independence measure and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. J Rehabil Med2015; 47(7): 662–664.
39.
HowlettOALanninNAAdaL, et al. Functional electrical stimulation improves activity after stroke: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2015; 96(5): 934–943.
40.
KuglerCAltenhonerTLochnerP, et al. Does age influence early recovery from ischemic stroke? A study from the Hessian Stroke Data Bank. J Neurol2003; 250(6): 676–681.
41.
HuXLTongRKHoNS, et al. Wrist rehabilitation assisted by an electromyography-driven neuromuscular electrical stimulation robot after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2015; 29(8): 767–776.
42.
ChaeJKilgoreKTrioloR, et al. Neuromuscular stimulation for motor neuroprosthesis in hemiplegia. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med2000; 12(1): 1–23.
43.
TakeuchiNIzumiS.Maladaptive plasticity for motor recovery after stroke: mechanisms and approaches. Neural Plast2012; 2012: 359728.
44.
LeeYLinKChengHJ, et al. Effects of combining robot-assisted therapy with neuromuscular electrical stimulation on motor impairment, motor and daily function, and quality of life in patients with chronic stroke: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil2015; 12: 96.
45.
Marquez-ChinCBagherSZivanovicV, et al. Functional electrical stimulation therapy for severe hemiplegia: randomized control trial revisited. Can J Occup Ther2017; 84(2): 87–97.
46.
LinZYanT.Long-term effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation for promoting motor recovery of the upper extremity after stroke. J Rehabil Med2011; 43(6): 506–510.
47.
LiuGFZhouZX.Effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in various modes on the rehabilitation of upper limb function in patients with hemiplegia. Chin J Clin Rehabil2004; 8(22): 4424–4425 (in Chinese).
48.
RosewilliamSMalhotraSRoffeC, et al. Can surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the wrist and hand combined with routine therapy facilitate recovery of arm function in patients with stroke?Arch Phys Med Rehabil2012; 93(10): 1715.e1–1721.e1.
49.
ShimodozonoMNomaTMatsumotoS, et al. Repetitive facilitative exercise under continuous electrical stimulation for severe arm impairment after sub-acute stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Brain Inj2014; 28(2): 203–210.
50.
YozbatiranNDonmezBKayakN, et al. Electrical stimulation of wrist and fingers for sensory and functional recovery in acute hemiplegia. Clin Rehabil2006; 20(1): 4–11.
51.
IkunoKKawaguchiSKitabeppuS, et al. Effects of peripheral sensory nerve stimulation plus task-oriented training on upper extremity function in patients with subacute stroke: a pilot randomized crossover trial. Clin Rehabil2012; 26(11): 999–1009.
52.
HeckmannJMokruschTKrockelA, et al. EMG-triggered muscle stimulation in the treatment of central hemiparesis after stroke. Eur J Phys Med Rehabil1997; 7(5): 138–141.
53.
BhattENagpalAGreerKH, et al. Effect of finger tracking combined with electrical stimulation on brain reorganization and hand function in subjects with stroke. Exp Brain Res2007; 182(4): 435–447.
54.
CauraughJHCoombesSALodhaN, et al. Upper extremity improvements in chronic stroke: coupled bilateral load training. Restor Neurol Neurosci2009; 27(1): 17–25.
55.
CauraughJHKimSB.Chronic stroke motor recovery: duration of active neuromuscular stimulation. J Neurol Sci2003; 215(1–2): 13–19.
56.
FranciscoGChaeJChawlaH, et al. Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation for improving the arm function of acute stroke survivors: a randomized pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1998; 79(5): 570–575.
57.
ShinHKChoSHJeonHS, et al. Cortical effect and functional recovery by the electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation in chronic stroke patients. Neurosci Lett2008; 442(3): 174–179.
58.
ShindoKFujiwaraTHaraJ, et al. Effectiveness of hybrid assistive neuromuscular dynamic stimulation therapy in patients with subacute stroke: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2011; 25(9): 830–837.
59.
CarricoCCheletteKC2ndWestgatePM, et al. Randomized trial of peripheral nerve stimulation to enhance modified constraint-induced therapy after stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2016; 95(6): 397–406.
60.
CarricoCCheletteKC2ndWestgatePM, et al. Nerve stimulation enhances task-oriented training in chronic, severe motor deficit after stroke: a randomized trial. Stroke2016; 47(7): 1879–1884.
61.
JeonSMKimYJungKS, et al. The effects of electromyography—triggered electrical stimulation on shoulder subluxation, muscle activation, pain, and function in stroke patients—pilot study. Neurorehabilitation2016; 40(1): 1–7.
62.
CarricoCWestgatePMSalmon PowellE, et al. Nerve stimulation enhances task-oriented training for moderate-to-severe hemiparesis 3-12 months after stroke: a randomized trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2018; 97(11): 808–815.
63.
JungKJungJInT, et al. The influence of task-related training combined with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on paretic upper limb muscle activation in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabilitation2017; 40(3): 315–323.
64.
KattenstrothJCKalischTSczesny-KaiserM, et al. Daily repetitive sensory stimulation of the paretic hand for the treatment of sensorimotor deficits in patients with subacute stroke: RESET, a randomized, sham-controlled trial. BMC Neurol2018; 18(1): 2.
65.
TilkiciMAlemdarogluEMandirogluS, et al. The effect of upper extremity electrical stimulation in addition to conventional rehabilitation in individuals with chronic stroke: randomized controlled study. J Phys Med Rehabil Sci2017; 20(3): 126–133.
66.
ParkJSChoiJBAnDH, et al. Effects of mental practice combined with electromyogram-triggered electrical stimulation for upper extremity function in stroke patients. J Phys Ther Sci2017; 29(10): 1819–1820.
67.
JonsdottirJThorsenRAprileI, et al. Arm rehabilitation in post stroke subjects: a randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of myoelectrically driven FES applied in a task-oriented approach. PLoS ONE2017; 12(12): e0188642.
68.
DorschSAdaLCanningCG.EMG-triggered electrical stimulation is a feasible intervention to apply to multiple arm muscles in people early after stroke, but does not improve strength and activity more than usual therapy: a randomized feasibility trial. Clin Rehabil2014; 28(5): 482–490.
69.
CauraughJHKimSB.Stroke motor recovery: active neuromuscular stimulation and repetitive practice schedules. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2003; 74(11): 1562–1566.
70.
CauraughJLightKKimS, et al. Chronic motor dysfunction after stroke: recovering wrist and finger extension by electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation. Stroke2000; 31(6): 1360–1364.
71.
PowellJPandyanADGranatM, et al. Electrical stimulation of wrist extensors in poststroke hemiplegia. Stroke1999; 30(7): 1384–1389.
72.
GabrULevinePPageSJ.Home-based electromyography-triggered stimulation in chronic stroke. Clin Rehabil2005; 19(7): 737–745.
73.
BarkerRNHaywardKSCarsonRG, et al. SMART arm training with outcome-triggered electrical stimulation in subacute stroke survivors with severe arm disability: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2017; 31(12): 1005–1016.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
