WangYGuYChenJet al. Kinesio taping is superior to other taping methods in ankle functional performance improvement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil2018; 32(11): 1472–1481.
2.
Parreira PdoCCosta LdaCHespanholLCJret al. Current evidence does not support the use of Kinesio Taping in clinical practice: a systematic review. J Physiother2014; 60(1): 31–39.
3.
NunesGSDe NoronhaMCunhaHSet al. Effect of Kinesio taping on jumping and balance in athletes: a crossover randomized controlled trial. J Strength Cond Res2013; 27(11): 3183–3189.
4.
NakajimaMABaldridgeC.The effect of Kinesio® tape on vertical jump and dynamic postural control. Int J Sports Phys Ther2013; 8(4): 393–406.
5.
CheungRTHYauQKCWongKet al. Kinesiology tape does not promote vertical jumping performance: a deceptive crossover trial. Man Ther2016; 21: 89–93.
6.
LeeBGLeeJH.Immediate effects of ankle balance taping with kinesiology tape on the dynamic balance of young players with functional ankle instability. Technol Health Care2015; 23(3): 333–341.
7.
LeeSMLeeJH.The immediate effects of ankle balance taping with kinesiology tape on ankle active range of motion and performance in the balance error scoring system. Phys Ther Sport2017; 25: 99–105.
8.
Gomez-SorianoJAbian-VicenJAparicio-GarciaCet al. The effects of Kinesio taping on muscle tone in healthy subjects: a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. Man Ther2014; 19(2): 131–136.
9.
BrogdenCMMarrinKPageRMet al. The efficacy of elastic therapeutic tape variations on measures of ankle function and performance. Phys Ther Sport2018; 32: 74–79.
de-la-Torre-DomingoCAlguacil-DiegoIMMolina-RuedaFet al. Effect of kinesiology tape on measurements of balance in subjects with chronic ankle instability: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2015; 96(12): 2169–2175.
12.
BiciciSKaratasNBaltaciG.Effect of athletic taping and Kinesiotaping® on measurements of functional performance in basketball players with chronic inversion ankle sprains. Int J Sports Phys Ther2012; 7(2): 154–166.
13.
MaherCGSherringtonCHerbertRDet al. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther2003; 83(8): 713–721.
14.
Van TulderMFurlanABombardierCet al. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine2003; 28(12): 1290–1299.
