Effectiveness of a precast adjustable compression system compared to multilayered compression bandages in the treatment of breast cancer–related lymphoedema: a randomized,single-blind clinical trial

Abstract

Objective:

To compare the effectiveness of a precast adjustable compression system with that of multilayered compression bandages in the treatment of breast cancer–related lymphoedema.

Design:

Multicenter, randomized, single-blind parallel-group clinical trial.

Setting:

The rehabilitation services of four general university hospitals.

Subjects:

Patients with upper limb breast cancer–related lymphoedema.

Interventions:

All the patients received manual lymphatic drainage, followed by a precast adjustable compression system or multilayered compression bandages, according to the group allocation. The treatment included 10 consecutive sessions over a two-week period from Monday to Friday, followed by some sessions on three alternate days per week, until the patient received a tailored compression garment.

Primary measurements:

The patients were evaluated just before the treatment, after 10 sessions and at three months posttreatment. The primary outcome was the change in excess lymphoedema volume. Secondary outcomes were changes in the symptoms of pain, heaviness, tightness and hardness. Analyses were performed using an intention-to-treat approach.

Results:

In all, 42 patients were included; there were 22 in the precast adjustable compression system group and 20 in the multilayered compression bandages group. Both groups exhibited significant decreases in excess volume and symptoms after 10 sessions and at three months. There were no significant differences regarding excess volume or symptoms between the precast adjustable compression system and multilayered compression bandages groups after 10 sessions and at the three-month follow-up exam.

Conclusion:

The precast adjustable compression system and the multilayered compression bandages have similar efficacy for the reduction of excess lymphoedema volume or symptoms.

Keywords

Rehabilitation interventions lymphoedema breast cancer conservative therapies

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Paskett

Dean

Oliveri

et al . Cancer-related lymphedema risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, and impact: a review. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30(30): 3726–3733.

DiSipio

Rye

Newman

et al . Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2013; xiv(6): 500–515.

Lee

Kilbreath

Refshauge

et al . Prognosis of the upper limb following surgery and radiation for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008; 110(1): 19–37.

Lee

Andrade

Bergan

et al . Diagnosis and treatment of primary lymphedema. Int Angiol 2010; 29(5): 454–470.

McNeely

Magee

Lees

et al . The addition of manual lymph drainage to compression therapy for breast cancer related lymphedema: a randomized controlled trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2004; 86(2): 95–106.

International Lymphoedema Framework. Best practice for the management of lymphoedema, https://www.lympho.org/portfolio/best-practice-for-the-management-of-lymphoedema/ (accessed 26 February 2018).

Stout

Partsch

Szolnoky

et al . Chronic edema of the lower extremities: international consensus recommendations for compression therapy clinical research trials. Int Angiol 2012; 31(4): 316–329.

Mosti

Cavezzi

Partsch

et al . Adjustable Velcro compression devices are more effective than inelastic bandages in reducing venous edema in the initial treatment phase: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015; 50(3): 368–374.

Partsch

Mosti

Pressure-time integral of elastic versus inelastic bandages: practical implications. EWMA J 2013; 13(2): 15–17.

10.

Lund

Exploring the use of CircAid legging in the management of lymphoedema. Int J Palliat Nurs 2000; 6(8): 383–391.

11.

Damstra

Partsch

Prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of adjustable compression Velcro wraps versus inelastic multicomponent compression bandages in the initial treatment of leg lymphedema. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2013; 1(1): 13–19.

12.

Taylor

Jayasinghe

Koelmeyer

et al . Reliability and validity of arm volume measurements for assessment of lymphedema. Phys Ther 2006; 86(2): 205–214.

13.

Williams

A review of the evidence for adjustable compression wrap devices. J Wound Care 2016; 25(5): 242–247.

14.

Kim

S-J

C-H

Kwon

O-Y.

Effect of complex decongestive therapy on edema and the quality of life in breast cancer patients with unilateral lymphedema. Lymphology 2007; 40(3): 143–151.

15.

Oremus

Dayes

Walker

et al . Systematic review: conservative treatments for secondary lymphedema. BMC Cancer 2012; 12: 6.

16.

Vignes

Porcher

Arrault

et al . Long-term management of breast cancer-related lymphedema after intensive decongestive physiotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007; 101(3): 285–290.

17.

Johansson

Albertsson

Ingvar

et al . Effects of compression bandaging with or without manual lymph drainage treatment in patients with postoperative arm lymphedema. Lymphology 1999; 32(3): 103–110.

18.

Ehmann

Whitaker

Hampton

et al . Multinational, pilot audit of a Velcro adjustable compression wrap system for venous and lymphatic conditions. J Wound Care 2016; 25(9): 513–520.

19.

Preston

Seers

Mortimer

PS.

Physical therapies for reducing and controlling lymphoedema of the limbs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; 18(4): CD003141.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.11 MB