A structured exercise programme combined with proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching or static stretching in posttraumatic stiffness of the elbow: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Objectives:

To compare the different stretching techniques, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching and static stretching, in patients with elbow stiffness after a treated elbow fracture.

Design:

Randomized-controlled, single-blind study.

Setting:

Department of physiotherapy and rehabilitation.

Subjects:

Forty patients with posttraumatic elbow stiffness (24 women; mean age, 41.34 ± 7.57 years).

Intervention:

PNF stretching group (n = 20), hold-relax PNF stretching combined with a structured exercise programme (two days per week for six weeks); static stretching group (n = 20), static stretching combined with a structured exercise programme (two days per week for six weeks).

Main measures:

The primary outcome is the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH). The secondary outcomes are active range of motion (AROM), visual analogue scale (VAS), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Short Form-12 and Global Rating of Change. Participants were assessed at baseline, after a six-week intervention period and one-month later (follow-up).

Results:

After treatment, improvement in the mean DASH score was slightly better in the PNF stretching group (8.66 ± 6.15) compared with the static stretching group (19.25 ± 10.30) (p = 0.03). The overall group-by-time interaction for the 2 × 3 mixed-model analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was also significant for elbow flexion AROM (mean change for PNF stretching group; static stretching group; 41.10, 34.42, p = 0.04), VAS-rest (–1.31, –1.08, p = 0.03) and VAS-activity (–3.78, –3.47, p = 0.01) in favour of PNF stretching group. The other outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups.

Conclusion:

The study demonstrated that the structured exercise programme combined with PNF stretching might be effective in patients with posttraumatic elbow stiffness with regard to improving function, elbow flexion AROM, pain at rest and during activity.

Keywords

Contracture exercise function range of motion pain

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Schrumpf

Lyman

, et al. Incidence of postoperative elbow contracture release in New York State. J Hand Surg 2013; 38: 1746–1752.e1-3.

Cheung

Sarkissian

EJ.

Complications of elbow trauma. Hand Clin 2015; 31: 683–691.

Sardelli

Tashjian

MacWilliams

BA.

Functional elbow range of motion for contemporary tasks. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93: 471–477.

Jones

Conservative management of the post-traumatic stiff elbow: a physiotherapist’s perspective. Shoulder Elbow 2016; 8: 134–141.

Macdermid

Vincent

Kieffer

, et al. A survey of practice patterns for rehabilitation post elbow fracture. Open Orthop J 2012; 6: 429–439.

Knudson

The biomechanics of stretching. JESP 2006; 2: 3–12.

Hindle

Whitcomb

Briggs

, et al. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF): its mechanisms and effects on range of motion and muscular function. J Hum Kinet 2012; 31: 105–113.

Behm

Blazevich

Kay

, et al. Acute effects of muscle stretching on physical performance, range of motion, and injury incidence in healthy active individuals: a systematic review. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2016; 41: 1–11.

Page

Current concepts in muscle stretching for exercise and rehabilitation. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2012; 7: 109–119.

10.

Chow

GY.

Active, passive and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching are comparable in improving the knee flexion range in people with total knee replacement: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2010; 24: 911–918.

11.

Yildirim

Ozyurek

Tosun

, et al. Comparison of effects of static, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and Mulligan stretching on hip flexion range of motion: a randomized controlled trial. Biol Sport 2016; 33: 89–94.

12.

Funk

Swank

Mikla

, et al. Impact of prior exercise on hamstring flexibility: a comparison of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and static stretching. J Strength Cond Res 2003; 17: 489–492.

13.

Papp

Souza

Lima

SMPF

, et al. Comparison between DASH and SF-36 of the injured elbow rehabilitated in occupational therapy. Acta Ortop Bras 2011; 19: 356–361.

14.

Smith

Calfee

Baumgarten

, et al. Upper extremity-specific measures of disability and outcomes in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94: 277–285.

15.

Hudak

Amadio

Bombardier

Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med 1996; 29: 602–608.

16.

Düger

Yakut

Öksüz

, et al. Kol, omuz ve el sorunları (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand-DASH) anketi Türkçe uyarlamasının güvenirliği ve geçerliği. Fizyoter Rehabil 2006; 17: 99–107.

17.

Norkin

White

DJ.

Measurement of joint motion: a guide to goniometry. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis, 2009.

18.

Chapleau

Canet

Petit

, et al. Validity of goniometric elbow measurements: comparative study with a radiographic method. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469: 3134–3140.

19.

Carlsson

. Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain 1983; 16: 87–101.

20.

Vlaeyen

Kole-Snijders

Boeren

, et al. Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance. Pain 1995; 62: 363–372.

21.

Yılmaz

ÖT

Yakut

Uygur

, et al. Tampa Kinezyofobi Ölçeği’nin Türkçe versiyonu ve test-tekrar test güvenirliği. Fizyoter Rehabil 2011; 22: 44–49.

22.

Kocyigit

Aydemir

Olmez

, et al. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of short-form-36 (SF-36). Turkish J Drugs Therap 1999; 12: 102–106.

23.

Ware

Jr Kosinski

Keller

SD.

A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996; 34: 220–233.

24.

Kamper

Maher

Mackay

Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. J Man Manip Ther 2009; 17: 163–170.

25.

Khamwong

Pirunsan

Paungmali

A prophylactic effect of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching on symptoms of muscle damage induced by eccentric exercise of the wrist extensors. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2011; 15: 507–516.

26.

Adler

Beckers

Buck

PNF in practice: an illustrated guide. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2008, pp.33–34.

27.

Sharman

Cresswell

Riek

Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching: mechanisms and clinical implications. Sports Med 2006; 36: 929–939.

28.

Pallant

SPSS survival manual. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education, 2013, p.245.

29.

Fusaro

Orsini

Stignani Kantar

, et al. Elbow rehabilitation in traumatic pathology. Musculoskelet Surg 2014; 98(suppl. 1): 95–102.

30.

Bruder

Shields

Dodd

, et al. Prescribed exercise programs may not be effective in reducing impairments and improving activity during upper limb fracture rehabilitation: a systematic review. J Physiother 2017; 63: 205–220.

31.

Mellema

Lindenhovius

Jupiter

JB.

The posttraumatic stiff elbow: an update. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2016; 9: 190–198.

32.

Freitas

Mendes

Le Sant

, et al. Can chronic stretching change the muscle-tendon mechanical properties? A review. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2017; 28: 794–806.

33.

Greiwe

Shoulder and elbow trauma and its complications – volume 2: the elbow. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 2015.

34.

Lee

Hobden

Stiell

, et al. Clinically important change in the visual analog scale after adequate pain control. Acad Emerg Med 2003; 10: 1128–1130.

35.

Hoeger Bement

Dicapo

Rasiarmos

, et al. Dose response of isometric contractions on pain perception in healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008; 40: 1880–1889.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB