Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2018-10
The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with group exercise treatment in subjects with chronic low back pain: a pilot randomized control trial
To test the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in addition to group exercise on non-specific chronic low back pain.
Design:
Double-blinded randomized control trial.
Subjects:
Patients with non-specific chronic low back pain.
Methods:
A total of 35 subjects were recruited and allocated to real- or sham-tDCS followed by a group exercise protocol. Each patient underwent five sessions of brain stimulation followed by 10 sessions of group exercise. Subjects were evaluated before and after tDCS, after group exercise and one month after the combined treatment. Outcome measures were Visual Analog Scale for pain intensity, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, EuroQuol-5 Dimension and Patient Health Questionnaire-9.
Results:
Significant between-group difference in pain intensity (−27.7 ± 30.4 mm in real-tDCS group compared to −2.2 ± 30.1 mm in sham-tDCS group) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (−4.9 ± 4.2 in real-tDCS group compared to −1.1 ± 2.7 in sham-tDCS group) was found one month after the combined treatment (P < 0.05).
Conclusion:
Our results showed that real-tDCS can induce significant larger effects on pain and psychological well-being, compared to sham-tDCS, when it is associated with a group exercise program. The effects were observed mostly in the follow-up.
NelsonAMNagpalG. Interventional approaches to low back pain. Clin Spine Surg2018; 31(5): 188–196
2.
BernsteinIAMalikQCarvilleSet al. Low back pain and sciatica: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ2017; 356: i6748.
3.
AntalATerneyDKühnlSet al. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex ameliorates chronic pain and reduces short intracortical inhibition. J Pain Symptom Manage2010; 39: 890–903.
4.
FregniFGimenesRValleACet al. A randomized, sham-controlled, proof of principle study of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of pain in fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum2006; 54: 3988–3998.
5.
NgernyamNJensenMPArayawichanonPet al. The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with neuropathic pain from spinal cord injury. Clin Neurophysiol2015; 126: 382–390.
6.
BoggioPSZaghiSLopesMet al. Modulatory effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on perception and pain thresholds in healthy volunteers. Eur J Neurol2008; 15: 1124–1130.
7.
RibertoMMarcon AlfieriFMonteirodeBenedetto PachecoKet al. Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation coupled with a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program for the treatment of fibromyalgia. Open Rheumatol J2011; 5: 45–50.
8.
LuedtkeKRushtonAWrightCet al. Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation preceding cognitive behavioural management for chronic low back pain: sham controlled double blinded randomised controlled trial. BMJ2015; 350: h1640.
9.
OgonMKrismerMSöllnerWet al. Chronic low back pain measurement with visual analogue scales in different settings. Pain1996; 64: 425–428.
10.
GrigolettoFZappalàGAndersonDWet al. Norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination in a healthy population. Neurology1999; 53: 315–320.
11.
RolandMMorrisR. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine1983; 8: 141–144.
12.
PaduaRPaduaLCeccarelliEet al. Italian version of the Roland Disability Questionnaire, specific for low back pain: cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Eur Spine J2002; 11: 126–129.
13.
Suarez-AlmazorMEKendallCJohnsonJAet al. Use of health status measures in patients with low back pain in clinical settings. Comparison of specific, generic and preference-based instruments. Rheumatol Oxf Engl2000; 39: 783–790.
14.
BalestroniGBertolottiG. EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D): an instrument for measuring quality of life. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis2012; 78: 155–159.
15.
SpitzerRLKroenkeKWilliamsJB. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary care evaluation of mental disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. JAMA1999; 282: 1737–1744.
16.
GandigaPCHummelFCCohenLG. Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol2006; 117: 845–850.
17.
OsteloRWJGDeyoRAStratfordPet al. Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine2008; 33: 90–94.
18.
BoggioPSNunesARigonattiSPet al. Repeated sessions of noninvasive brain DC stimulation is associated with motor function improvement in stroke patients. Restor Neurol Neurosci2007; 25: 123–129.
19.
ThibautACarvalhoSMorseLRet al. Delayed pain decrease following M1 tDCS in spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Neurosci Lett2017; 658: 19–26.
20.
DasilvaAFMendoncaMEZaghiSet al. tDCS-induced analgesia and electrical fields in pain-related neural networks in chronic migraine. Headache2012; 52: 1283–1295.
21.
VitordeSouza BrangioniMCPereiraDAThibautAet al. Effects of prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation and motivation to quit in tobacco smokers: a randomized, sham controlled, double-blind trial. Front Pharmacol2018; 9: 14.
CabralMEBaltarABorbaRet al. Transcranial direct current stimulation: before, during, or after motor training?Neuroreport2015; 26: 618–622.
24.
VillamarMFWivatvongvanaPPatumanondJet al. Focal modulation of the primary motor cortex in fibromyalgia using 4×1-ring high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS): immediate and delayed analgesic effects of cathodal and anodal stimulation. J Pain2013; 14: 371–383.
25.
MendoncaMESimisMGreccoLCet al. Transcranial direct current stimulation combined with aerobic exercise to optimize analgesic responses in fibromyalgia: a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Front Hum Neurosci2016; 10: 68.
26.
BoggioPSAmancioEJCorreaCFet al. Transcranial DC stimulation coupled with TENS for the treatment of chronic pain: a preliminary study. Clin J Pain2009; 25: 691–695.
27.
SolerMDKumruHPelayoRet al. Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation and visual illusion on neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury. Brain J Neurol2010; 133: 2565–2577.
28.
CanoTMorales-QuezadaJLBiksonMet al. Methods to focalize noninvasive electrical brain stimulation: principles and future clinical development for the treatment of pain. Expert Rev Neurother2013; 13: 465–467.
29.
ColagiuriBSchenkLAKesslerMDet al. The placebo effect: from concepts to genes. Neuroscience2015; 307: 171–190.
30.
FentonBWPalmieriPABoggioPet al. A preliminary study of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of refractory chronic pelvic pain. Brain Stimulat2009; 2: 103–107.
31.
FregniFBoggioPSLimaMCet al. A sham-controlled, phase II trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of central pain in traumatic spinal cord injury. Pain2006; 122: 197–209.
RostamiRBadranBWKazemiRet al. Long-lasting analgesic effect of transcranial direct current stimulation in treatment of chronic endometriosis pain. J Obstet Gynaecol Res2015; 41: 1998–2001.
34.
CioatoSGMedeirosLFMarques FilhoPRet al. Long-lasting effect of transcranial direct current stimulation in the reversal of hyperalgesia and cytokine alterations induced by the neuropathic pain model. Brain Stimulat2016; 9: 209–217.
35.
BushnellMCCekoMLowLA. Cognitive and emotional control of pain and its disruption in chronic pain. Nat Rev Neurosci2013; 14: 502–511.
Massé-AlarieHSchneiderC. Revisiting the corticomotor plasticity in low back pain: challenges and perspectives. Healthcare2016; 4: 67.
38.
NijsJApeldoornAHallegraeffHet al. Low back pain: guidelines for the clinical classification of predominant neuropathic, nociceptive, or central sensitization pain. Pain Physician2015; 18: E333–E346.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
