Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective:

To investigate the effects of mirror therapy on walking ability, balance and lower limb motor recovery in patients with stroke.

Method:

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL, PEDro Database, CNKI, VIP, Wan Fang, ClinicalTrials.gov, Current controlled trials and Open Grey were searched for randomized controlled trials that investigated the effects of mirror therapy on lower limb function through January 2018. The primary outcomes included were walking speed, mobility and balance function. Secondary outcomes included lower limb motor recovery, spasticity and range of motion. Quality assessments were performed with the PEDro scale.

Results:

A total of 13 studies (n = 572) met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis demonstrated a significant effect of mirror therapy on walking speed (mean difference (MD) 0.1 m/s, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.08 to 0.12, P < 0.00001), balance function (standard mean difference (SMD) 0.66, 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.88, P < 0.00001), lower limb motor recovery (SMD 0.83, 95% CI: 0.62 to 1.05, P < 0.00001) and passive range of motion of ankle dorsiflexion (MD 2.07°, 95% CI: 082 to 3.32, P = 0.001), without improving mobility (SMD 0.43, 95% CI: −0.12 to 0.98, P = 0.12) or spasticity of ankle muscles (MD −0.14, 95% CI: −0.43 to 0.15, P = 0.35).

Conclusion:

The systematic review demonstrates that the use of mirror therapy in addition to some form of rehabilitation appears promising for some areas of lower limb function, but there is not enough evidence yet to suggest when and how to approach this therapy.

Keywords

Mirror therapy walking balance motor recovery stroke

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arene

Hidler

Understanding motor impairment in the paretic lower limb after a stroke: a review of the literature. Top Stroke Rehabil 2009; 16: 346–356.

Arya

Pandian

Interlimb neural coupling: implications for poststroke hemiparesis. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2014; 57: 696–713.

Cunha

Lim

Henson

et al . Performance-based gait tests for acute stroke patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 81: 848–856.

Perry

Garrett

Gronley

et al . Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. Stroke 1995; 26: 982–989.

Jørgensen

Nakayama

Raaschou

et al . Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 27–32.

Boudarham

Roche

Pradon

et al . Variations in kinematics during clinical gait analysis in stroke patients. PLoS ONE 2013; 8: e66421.

Flansbjer

Holmback

Downham

et al . Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 75–82.

Cress

Fleming

WC.

Treatment goals and selection of patients for rehabilitation with hemiplegia. Ala J Med Sci 1966; 3: 307–311.

Winstein

Stein

Arena

et al . Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2016; 47: e98–e169.

10.

Dohle

Pullen

Nakaten

et al . Mirror therapy promotes recovery from severe hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009; 23: 209–217.

11.

Deconinck

Smorenburg

Benham

et al . Reflections on mirror therapy: a systematic review of the effect of mirror visual feedback on the brain. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2015; 29: 349–361.

12.

Yavuzer

Selles

Sezer

et al . Mirror therapy improves hand function in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 393–398.

13.

Thieme

Mehrholz

Pohl

et al . Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 14: CD008449.

14.

Hung

GKN

CTL

Yiu

et al . Systematic review: effectiveness of mirror therapy for lower extremity post-stroke. Hong Kong J Occupat Ther 2015; 26: 51–59.

15.

Rothgangel

Braun

Beurskens

AJS

et al . The clinical aspects of mirror therapy in rehabilitation: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Rehabil Res 2011; 34: 1–13.

16.

Huwaldt

Plot digitizer, http://plotdigitizer.sourceforge.net/ (2001, accessed 24 October 2015).

17.

Maher

Sherrington

Herbert

et al . Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther 2003; 83: 713–721.

18.

Verhagen

De Vet

De Bie

et al . The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 1235–1241.

19.

De Morton

NA.

The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study. Aust J Physiother 2009; 55: 129–133.

20.

Sherrington

Herbert

Maher

et al . PEDro: a database of randomized trials and systematic reviews in physiotherapy. Man Ther 2000; 5: 223–226.

21.

Teasell

Foley

Salter

et al . Evidence-based review of stroke rehabilitation: executive summary, 12th edition. Top Stroke Rehabil 2009; 16: 463–488.

22.

Sterne

Sutton

Ioannidis

et al . Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2011; 343: d4002.

23.

Sutbeyaz

Yavuzer

Sezer

et al . Mirror therapy enhances lower-extremity motor recovery and motor functioning after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88: 555–559.

24.

Barnes

LJ.

Effect of mirror therapy on lower extremity motor control and gait in patients with stroke. ClinicalTrials.gov, 2014, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT01574079?cond=effect+of+mirror+therapy+on+lower+extremity+motor+control&rank=1

25.

Kim

MK.

The effects of mirror therapy on the gait of subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2015; 29: 348–354.

26.

Salem

HMA

Huang

. The effects of mirror therapy on clinical improvement in hemiplegic lower extremity rehabilitation in subjects with chronic stroke. Int Scholar Sci Res Innovat 2015; 9: 163–166.

27.

Cha

Kim

MK.

Therapeutic efficacy of low frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation in conjunction with mirror therapy for sub-acute stroke patients. J Magnet 2015; 20: 51–56.

28.

Kim

Cha

HG.

The effect of mirror therapy on balance ability of subacute stroke patients. Hong Kong Physiother J 2016; 34: 27–32.

29.

Lee

Song

Virtual reality reflection therapy improves balance and gait in patients with chronic stroke: randomized controlled trials. Med Sci Monitor 2016; 22: 4046–4053.

30.

Guo

Salem

HMA

et al . Effects of mirror therapy combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation on motor recovery of lower limbs and walking ability of patients with stroke: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil 2017; 31: 1583–1591.

31.

Cha

Kim

MK.

The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation integrated mirror therapy on the gait of chronic stroke patients. J Magnetics 2015; 20: 133–137.

32.

Arya

Pandian

Kumar

Effect of activity-based mirror therapy on lower limb motor-recovery and gait in stroke: a randomised controlled trial. Neuropsychol Rehabil. Epub ahead of print 26 September 2017. DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2017.1377087.

33.

Haiyan

Zhijun

Ping

et al . Effect observattion of mirror therapy combined with routine rehabilitation training on limb motor function and balance of patients with post-stroke hemiplegia. Med Pharm J Chin PLA 2017; 29: 34–37.

34.

Haiyan

Zhijun

Ping

Study on rehabilitation effect of Danhong injection combined with mirror therapy on lower limb motor dysfunction in stroke patients with hemiplegia. Shanxi Med J 2017; 46: 2178–2181.

35.

Mohan

Babu

Kumar

et al . Effectiveness of mirror therapy on lower extremity motor recovery, balance and mobility in patients with acute stroke: a randomized sham-controlled pilot trial. Ann Ind Acad Neurol 2013; 16: 634–639.

36.

Staines

McIlroy

Graham

et al . Bilateral movement enhances ipsilesional cortical activity in acute stroke: a pilot functional MRI study. Neurology 2001; 56: 401–404.

37.

Cunningham

Stoykov

Walter

CB.

Bilateral facilitation of motor control in chronic hemiplegia. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2002; 110: 321–337.

38.

Hsu

Tang

Jan

MH.

Analysis of impairments influencing gait velocity and asymmetry of hemiplegic patients after mild to moderate stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 1185–1193.

39.

Brandstater

De Bruin

Gowland

et al . Hemiplegic gait: analysis of temporal variables. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983; 64: 583–587.

40.

Bowden

Clark

Kautz

SA.

Evaluation of abnormal synergy patterns poststroke: relationship of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment to hemiparetic locomotion. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010; 24: 328–337.

41.

Given

Dewald

Rymer

WZ.

Joint dependent passive stiffness in paretic and contralateral limbs of spastic patients with hemiparetic stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1995; 59: 271–279.

42.

Gao

Ren

Roth

et al . Effects of repeated ankle stretching on calf muscle-tendon and ankle biomechanical properties in stroke survivors. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2011; 26: 516–522.

43.

Samuelkamaleshkumar

Reethajanetsureka

Pauljebaraj

et al . Mirror therapy enhances motor performance in the paretic upper limb after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014; 95: 2000–2005.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB

Effects of mirror therapy on walking ability,balance and lower limb motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials