Confirmatory factor analysis of 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule in patients with musculoskeletal pain conditions

Abstract

Objective:

To investigate the factor structure of the 12 item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0.

Design:

Cross-sectional cohort survey study.

Setting:

Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine outpatient university clinic.

Subjects:

The 408 consecutive patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Main measures:

Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.

Results:

A two-factor model most accurately fit the observed data of musculoskeletal pain patients (root mean square error of approximation 0.049, relative Chi square value 1.99). Twelve WHODAS 2.0 items were distributed between two factors with covariance between them of 0.8. The first factor contained domains related mostly to physical functioning, while another was associated mostly with social and cognitive functioning. There were a few differences between single items in their importance in defining the variance within these two factors. Of the six International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health domains belonging to the first construct, the ability to carry out household responsibilities explained most, 84% of the total variance in this construct. For the second factor, the ability to participate in community activities seemed to be the most important, explaining 85% of the total variance in this construct.

Conclusions:

In this study, the two-factor structure model of the 12-item WODAS 2.0 demonstrated the most accurate fit within patients with musculoskeletal pain conditions.

Keywords

Functioning International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health WHODAS factor analysis psychometric disability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

World Health Organization. WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 WHODAS 2.0: WHO 2014. www.who.int/classifications/icf/whodasii/en/ (accessed 16 October 2015).

World Health Organization. WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 WHODAS 2.0, Psychometric Qualities: WHO 2014. www.who.int/classifications/icf/whodasii/en/index2.html (accessed 16 October 2015).

Üstün

Chatterji

Kostanjsek

. Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. Bull World Health Organ 2010; 88(11): 815–823.

Buist-Bouwman

Ormel

De Graaf

. Psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule used in the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2008; 17(4): 185–197.

Luciano

Ayuso-Mateos

Fernandez

Serrano-Blanco

Roca

Haro

. Psychometric properties of the twelve item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO-DAS II) in Spanish primary care patients with a first major depressive episode. J Affect Disord 2010; 121(1–2): 52–58.

Schiavolin

Ferroli

Acerbi

. Disability in Italian neurosurgical patients: Validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule. Int J Rehabil Res 2014; 37(3): 267–270.

Carlozzi

Kratz

Downing

. Validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in individuals with Huntington Disease (HD). Qual Life Res 2015; 24(8): 1963–1971.

Andrews

Kemp

Sunderland

Von Korff

Ustun

. Normative data for the 12 item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. PLoS One 2009; 4(12): e8343.

Brown

. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research, 2nd ed. New York, NY: The Guilford Press, 2015.

10.

Child

. The essentials of factor analysis, 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2006.

11.

Byrne

. The Maslach Burnout Inventory: Validating factorial structure and invariance across intermediate, secondary, and university educators. Multivariate Behav Res 1991; 26(4): 583–605.