Task-specific reach-to-grasp training after stroke: development and description of a home-based intervention

Abstract

This series of articles for rehabilitation in practice aims to cover a knowledge element of the rehabilitation medicine curriculum. Nevertheless they are intended to be of interest to a multidisciplinary audience. The competency addressed in this article is to transparently describe the process of developing a complex intervention for people after stroke as part of a feasibility randomised controlled trial.

Objective:

To describe and justify the development of a home-based, task-specific upper limb training intervention to improve reach-to-grasp after stroke and pilot it for feasibility and acceptability prior to a randomized controlled trial.

Intervention description:

The intervention is based on intensive practice of whole reach-to-grasp tasks and part-practice of essential reach-to-grasp components. A ‘pilot’ manual of activities covering the domains of self-care, leisure and productivity was developed for the feasibility study. The intervention comprises 14 hours of therapist-delivered sessions over six weeks, with additional self-practice recommended for 42 hours (i.e. one hour every day). As part of a feasibility randomized controlled trial, 24 people with a wide range of upper limb impairment after stroke experienced the intervention to test adherence and acceptability. The median number of repetitions in one-hour therapist-delivered sessions was 157 (interquartile range IQR 96–211). The amount of self-practice was poorly documented. Where recorded, the median amount of practice was 30 minutes (interquartile range 22–45) per day. Findings demonstrated that the majority of participants found the intensity, content and level of difficulty of the intervention acceptable, and the programme to be beneficial. Comments on the content and presentation of the self-practice material were incorporated in a revised ‘final’ intervention manual.

Discussion:

A comprehensive training intervention to improve reach-to-grasp for people living at home after stroke has been described in accordance with the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) reporting guidelines. The intervention has been piloted, and found to be acceptable and feasible in the home setting.

Trial registration:

ISRCTN56716589

Keywords

Stroke hand arm upper limb physical therapy occupational therapy rehabilitation home reach grasp repetitive task-specific training practice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National clinical guideline for stroke. 4th ed. London: Royal College of Physicians, 2012.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Stroke rehabilitation [CG162]. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2013.

National Stroke Foundation. Clinical guidelines for stroke management. Melbourne, Australia: National Stroke Foundation, 2010.

Dawson

Knox

McClure

. Stroke rehabilitation. In: Lindsay

Gubitz

Bayley

Phillips

(eds) Canadian best practice recommendations for stroke care. 4th ed. Ontario, Canada: Ottawa, 2013.

French

Thomas

Leathley

. Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; Issue 4.

Pollock

Farmer

Brady

. Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; Issue 11.

Timmermans

Seelen

Willmann

. Arm and hand skills: Training preferences after stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2009; 31(16): 1344–1352.

van Wijck

Shaw

Price

. Botulinum Toxin for the Upper Limb after Stroke (BoTULS) trial: Effect on patient-selected goals versus a standard arm function test. In: World Stroke Congress, 10–13 October 2012, Brasilia, Brazil.

Kilbreath

Heard

. Frequency of hand use in healthy older persons. Aust J Physiother 2005; 51(2): 119–122.

10.

Coupar

Pollock

Legg

. Home-based therapy programmes for upper limb functional recovery following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012, Issue 5.

11.

Dobkin

. Progressive staging of pilot studies to improve phase III trials for motor interventions. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009; 23: 197–206.

12.

Hoffmann

Erueti

Glasziou

. Poor description of non-pharmacological interventions: Analysis of consecutive sample of randomised trials. BMJ 2013; 347: f3755.

13.

Cook

Douet

Boutron

. Descriptions of non-pharmacological interventions in clinical trials. BMJ 2013; 347: f5212.

14.

Medical Research Council. A framework for the development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health. London: Medical Research Council, 2000.

15.

Craig

Dieppe

Macintyre

. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008; 337: 979–983.

16.

Hoffmann

Glasziou

Boutron

. Better reporting of interventions: Template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ 2014; 348: g1687.

17.

Turton

Cunningham

Heron

. Home-based reach-to-grasp training for people after stroke: Study protocol for a feasibility randomized controlled trial. Trials 2013; 14: 109.

18.

Cha

Yoo

Jung

. Effects of functional task training with mental practice in stroke: A meta analysis. NeuroRehabil 2012; 30(3): 239–246.

19.

Michaelsen

Dannenbaum

Levin

. Task-specific training with trunk restraint on arm recovery in stroke: Randomized control trial. Stroke 2006; 37: 186–192.

20.

Carr

Shepherd

. A motor relearning programme for stroke. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: William Heinemann Medical Books, 1987, p.45–46.

21.

Magill

. Motor learning: Concepts and applications. 9th ed. McGraw-Hill, 2010.

22.

Carr

Shepherd

. Neurological rehabilitation: Optimizing motor performance. 2nd ed. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, 2010.

23.

Schmidt

Lee

. Motor control and learning – a behavioural emphasis. 5th ed. University of Michigan: Human Kinetics, 2011.

24.

Messenger

. Physiotherapy exercises, www.physiotherapyexercises.com (2014, accessed 30 June 2014).

25.

Durham

Sackley

Wright

. Attentional focus of feedback for improving performance of reach-to-grasp after stroke. Physiotherapy 2014; 100: 108–115.

26.

Subramanian

Massie

Malcolm

. Does provision of extrinsic feedback result in improved motor learning in the upper limb poststroke? A systematic review of the evidence. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010; 24: 113–124.

27.

Harris

Eng

Miller

. The role of caregiver involvement in upper-limb treatment in individuals with subacute stroke. Phys Ther 2010; 90(9): 1302–1310.

28.

Langhorne

Bernhardt

Kwakkel

. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet 2011; 377: 1693–1702.

29.

Trombly

. Effect of rehabilitation tasks on organization of movement after stroke. Am J Occup Ther 1999; 53: 333–347.

30.

Van Vliet

Kerwin

Sheridan

. The influence of functional goals on the kinematics of reaching following stroke. JNPT 1995; 19 (1): 11–16.

31.

Cooke

Mares

Clark

. The effects of increased dose of exercise-based therapies to enhance motor recovery after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medicine 2010; 8: 60.

32.

Wolf

Winstein

Miller

. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke. JAMA 2006; 296(17): 2095–2104.

33.

Hubbard

Parsons

Neilson

. Task-specific training: evidence for and translation to clinical practice. Occ Ther Int 2009; 16(3–4): 175–189.

34.

Nudo

Milliken

. Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurophysiol 1996; 75: 2144–2149.

35.

Kleim

Barbay

Nudo

. Functional reorganization of the rat motor cortex following motor skill learning. J Neurophysiol 1998; 80: 3321–3325.

36.

Birkenmeier

Prager

Lang

. Translating animal doses of task-specific training to people with chronic stroke in one hour therapy sessions: A proof-of-concept study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010, 24(7): 620–635.

37.

Coupar

Pollock

Rowe

. Predictors of upper limb recovery after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil 2012; 26(4): 291–313.

38.

Sugavanam

Mead

Bulley

. Goal setting after stroke: A systematic review of effects and experiences. Disabil Rehabil 2013; 35(3): 177–190.

39.

Napier

. The prehensile movements of the human hand. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1956; 38(4): 902–913.

40.

Kaplon

Prettyman

Kushi

. Six hours in the laboratory: A quantification of practice time during constraint-induced therapy (CIT). Clin Rehabil 2007; 21(10): 950–958.

41.

Stone

Shiffman

Schwartz

. Participant non-compliance with paper diaries. BMJ 2002; 324: 1193.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.25 MB

5.16 MB

0.26 MB