To determine the dose of activity-related arm training undertaken by stroke survivors during acute and subacute rehabilitation.
Methods:
A systematic review of PubMed, CINAHL and EMBASE up to December 2014 was completed. Studies were eligible if they defined the dose (time or repetitions) of activity-related arm training using observational methods for a cohort of adult stroke survivors receiving acute or subacute rehabilitation. All studies were quality appraised using an evidence-based learning critical appraisal checklist. Data was analysed by method of documented dose per session (minutes, repetitions), environment (acute or subacute rehabilitation) and therapy discipline (physiotherapy, occupational therapy).
Results:
Ten studies were included: two observed stroke survivors during acute rehabilitation and eight during subacute rehabilitation. During acute rehabilitation, one study reported 4.1 minutes per session during physiotherapy and 11.2 minutes during occupational therapy, while another study reported 5.7 minutes per session during physiotherapy only. During inpatient rehabilitation, activity-related arm training was on average undertaken for 4 minutes per session (range 0.9 to 7.9, n = 4 studies) during physiotherapy and 17 minutes per session (range 9.3 to 28.9, n = 3 studies) during occupational therapy. Repetitions per session were reported by two studies only during subacute rehabilitation. One study reported 23 repetitions per session during physiotherapy and occupational therapy, while another reported 32 repetitions per session across both disciplines.
Conclusion:
The dose of activity-related arm training during acute and subacute rehabilitation after stroke is limited.
GowlandC. Recovery of motor function following stroke: Profile and prediction. Physiother Can1982; 34: 77–84.
2.
KwakkelGKollenBJVan der GrondJPrevoAJ. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: The impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke2003; 34: 2181–2186.
3.
NakayamaHJorgensenHSRasschouHOOlsenTS. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1994; 75: 394–398.
4.
JorgensenHSNakayamaHRaaschouHOOlsenTS. Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: The Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1995; 76: 27–32.
5.
CirsteaMC. Interjoint coordination dynamics during reaching after stroke. Experimental Brain Res2003; 151: 289–300.
6.
ConnellLAMcMahonNEEngJJWatkinsCL. Prescribing upper limb exercises after stroke: A survey of current UK therapy practice.J Rehabil Med2014; 26: 212–218.
7.
KwakkelG. Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: Issues for consideration. Disabil Rehabil2006; 28: 823–830.
8.
BellJAWolkeMLOrtezRCJonesTAKerrAL. Training intensity affects motor rehabilitation efficacy following unilateral ischemic insult of the sensorimotor cortex in C57BL/6 mice. NeuroRehabil Neural Repair. Epub ahead of print 16October2014. DOI:10.1177/1545968314553031
9.
KleimJAJonesTA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: Implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hearing Res2008; 51: S225–S239.
10.
BoychukJAAdkinsDLKleimJA. Distributed versus focal cortical stimulation to enhance motor function and motor map plasticity in a rodent model of ischemia. NeuroRehabil Neural Repair2011; 25: 88–97.
11.
KleimJABruneauRVandenBergPMacDonaldEMulrooneyRPocockD. Motor cortex stimulation enhances motor recovery and reduces peri-infarct dysfunction following ischemic insult. Neurological Res2003; 25: 789–793.
12.
MacDonaldEVan der LeeHPocockD. A novel phosphodiesterase type 4 inhibitor, HT-0712, enhances rehabilitation-dependent motor recovery and cortical reorganization after focal cortical ischemia. NeuroRehabil Neural Repair2007; 21: 486–496.
13.
NudoRJMilikenGW. Reorganisation of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurophysiol1996; 75: 144–149.
14.
KleimJALussnigESchwarzERComeryTAGreenoughWT. Synaptogenesis and Fos expression in the motor cortex of the adult rat after motor skill learning. J Neurosci1996; 16: 4529–4535.
15.
TeskeyGCFlynnCGoertzenCDMonfilsMHYoungNA. Cortical stimulation improves skilled forelimb use following a focal ischemic infarct in the rat. Neurological Res2003; 25: 794–800.
16.
BoschJO’DonnellMJBarrecaSThabaneLWishartL. Does task-oriented practic improve upper extremity motor recovery after stroke? A systematic review. ISRN Stroke2014; 504910.
17.
KwakkelGvan PeppenRPSWagenaarRC. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: A meta-analysis. Stroke2004; 35: 2529–2536.
18.
LohseKRLangCEBoydLA. Is more better? Using meta-data to explore dose-response relationships in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke2014; 45: 2053–2058.
19.
National Stroke Foundation. Clinical guidelines for stroke management. National Stroke Foundation, Melbourne, Australia. 2010.
20.
Royal College of Physicians of London Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National clinical guidelines for stroke. London: Royal College of Physicians of London, 2008.
21.
Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapists. Stroke: Review of the evidence: Clinical practice guideline for physical therapy in patients with stroke. Netherlands: Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapists, 2008.
22.
KwakkelGMulderFVOomsACKollenBJ. Probability of regaining gait following acute stroke: A prospective cohort study. Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Fysiotherapie2004; 114: 2–8.
23.
SmaniaNPaolucciSTinazziM. Active finger extension: A simple movement predicting recovery of arm function in patients with acute stroke. Stroke2007; 38: 1088–1090.
24.
NijlandRHMvan WegenEEHHarmeling-van der WelBCKwakkelGInvestigatorsE. Presence of finger extension and shoulder abduction within 72 hours after stroke predicts functional recovery: Early prediction of functional outcome after stroke. The EPOS cohort study. Stroke2010; 41: 745–750.
25.
KaurGEnglishCHillierS. How physically active are people with stroke in physiotherapy sessions aimed at improving motor function? A systematic review. Stroke Res Treat2012: 820673.
26.
AdaLMackeyFHeardRAdamsRJ. Stroke rehabilitation: Does the therapy area provide a physical challenge?Australian J Physiother1999; 45: 33–38.
27.
BernhardtJChanJNicolaICollierJM. Little therapy, little physical activity: Rehabilitation within the first 14 days of organized stroke unit care. J Rehabil Med2007; 39: 43–48.
28.
ElsonTEnglishCHillierS. How much physical activity do people recovering from stroke do during physiotherapy sessions?Int J Ther Rehabil2009; 16: 78–84.
29.
GustafssonLNugentNBirosL. Occupational theapy practice in hospital-based stroke rehabilitation. Scand J Occupat Ther2012; 19: 132–139.
30.
HaywardKSBarkerRNWisemanAHBrauerSG. Dose and content of training provided to stroke survivors with severe upper limb disability undertaking inpatient rehabilitation: An observational study. Brain Impairment2013; 14: 392–405.
31.
HornSDDeJongGSmoutRJGassawayJJamesRConroyB. Stroke rehabilitation patients, practice and outcomes: Is earlier and more aggressive therapy better?Arch Phys Med Rehabil2005; 86: S101–114.
32.
KimberleyTJSamargiaSMooreLGShakyaJKLangCE. Comparison of amounts and types of practice during rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury and stroke. J Rehabil Res Develop2010; 47: 851–862.
33.
KuysSSBrauerSGAdaL. Routine physiotherapy does not induce a cardiorespiratory training effect post-stroke, regardless of walking ability. Physiotherapy Research International2006; 11: 219–227.
34.
LangCEMacdonaldJRReismanDS. Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2009; 90: 1692–1698.
35.
PeuralaSHAiraksinenOJakalaPTarkkaIMSiveniusJ. Effects of intensive gait-oriented physiotherapy during early acute phase of stroke. J Rehabil Res Develop2007; 44: 637–648.
36.
KleimJABarbaySNudoRJ. Functional reorganization of the rat motor cortex following motor skill learning. J Neurophysiol1998; 80: 3321–3325.
37.
WaddellKJBirkenmeierRLMooreJLHornbyTGLangCE. Feasibility of high-repetition, task-specific training for individuals with upper-extremity paresis. Am J Occupat Ther2014; 68: 444–453.
38.
ConnellLAMcMahonNESimpsonLAWatkinsCLEngJJ. Investigating measures of intensity during a structured upper limb exercise program in stroke rehabilitation: An exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2014; 95: 2410–2419.
39.
SaxenaSKNgTPYongDFongNPGeraldK. Total direct cost, length of hospital stay, institutional discharges and their determinants from rehabilitation settings in stroke patients. Acta Neurologica Scand2006; 14: 307–314.
40.
HaywardKSBarkerRNBrauerSG. Interventions to promote upper limb recovery in stroke survivors with severe paresis: A systematic review. Disabil Rehabil2010; 32: 1973–1986.
41.
HaywardKSBarkerRNBrauerSG. Advances in neuromuscular electrical stimulation for the upper limb post stroke. Phys Ther Rev2010; 15: 309–319.
42.
EnglishCBernhardtJHillierS. Circuit class therapy and 7-day-week therapy increase physiotherapy time, but not patient activity early results from the CIRCIT trial. Stroke2014; 45: 3002–3007.
43.
ScrivenerKSherringtonCSchurrKTreacyD. Many participants in inpatient rehabilitation can quantify their exercise dosage accurately: An observational study. Australian J Physiother2011; 57: 117–122.
44.
Van WijkRCummingTChurilovLDonnanGABernhardtJ. An early mobilisation protocol successfully delivers more and earlier therapy to acute stroke patients: Further results from Phase II of AVERT. NeuroRehabil Neural Repair2012; 26: 20–26.
45.
FoleyNCMcClureAMeyerMSalterKBureauYTeasellRW. Inpatient rehabilitation following stroke: Amount of therapy received and associations with functional recovery. Disabil Rehabil2012; 24: 2132–2138.
46.
VermeulenCJAHRBuijckBIvan der StegenJCGHSpruit-van EijkMKoopmansRTCMHafsteinsdottirTB. Time use of stroke patients with stroke admitted for rehabilitation in skilled nursing facilities. Rehabil Nursing2013; 38: 297–305.
47.
De WitLPutmanKDejaegerE. Use of time by stroke patients: A comparison of four European rehabilitation centres. Stroke2005; 36: 1977–1983.
48.
EngX-WBrauerSGKuysSSLordMHaywardKS. Factors affecting the ability of the stroke survivor to drive their own recovery outside therapy during inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Stroke Res Treat2014; 626538.
49.
HarrisJEEngJJMillerWCDawsonAC. A self-administered Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP) improves arm function during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a multi-site randomized controlled trial. Stroke2009; 40: 2123–2128.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
