Acute and community care in three Canadian cities.
Subjects:
Caregivers were family members or friends providing care to individuals who experienced their first stroke.
Intervention:
The TIRSFSP offered in two formats, self-directed by the caregiver or stroke support person-directed over time, were compared to standard care.
Main measures:
Caregivers completed baseline and follow-up measures 1, 3 and 6 months post-stroke including Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression, Positive Affect, Social Support, and Mastery Scales. We completed in-depth qualitative interviews with caregivers and maintained intervention records describing support provided to each caregiver.
Results:
Thirty-one caregivers received standard care (n=10), self-directed (n=10), or stroke support person-directed (n=11) interventions. We retained 77% of the sample through 6-months. Key areas of support derived from intervention records (n=11) related to caregiver wellbeing, caregiving strategies, patient wellbeing, community re-integration, and service delivery. Compared to standard care, caregivers receiving the stroke support person-directed intervention reported improvements in perceived support (estimate 3.1, P=.04) and mastery (estimate .35, P=.06). Qualitative caregiver interviews (n=19) reflected the complex interaction between caregiver needs, preferences and available options when reporting on level of satisfaction.
Conclusions:
Preliminary findings suggest the research design is feasible, caregivers’ needs are complex, and the support intervention may enhance caregivers’ perceived support and mastery. The intervention will be tested further in a large scale trial.
RochetteAKorner-BitenskyNDesrosiersJ. Actual vs best practice for families post-stroke according to three rehabilitation disciplines. J Rehabil Med2007; 39: 513–519.
2.
HanBHaleyWE. Family caregiving for patients with stroke. Review and analysis. Stroke1999; 30: 1478–1485.
3.
SalterKZettlerLFoleyNTeasellR. Impact of caring for individuals with stroke on perceived physical health of informal caregivers. Disabil Rehabil2010; 32: 273–281.
4.
RigbyHGubitzGPhillipsS. A systematic review of caregiver burden following stroke. Int J Stroke2009; 4: 285–292.
5.
LindsayPBayleyMMcDonaldAGrahamIDWarnerGPhillipsS. Toward a more effective approach to stroke: Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care. CMAJ2008; 178: 1418–1425.
6.
CameronJITsoiCMarsellaA. Optimizing stroke systems of care by enhancing transitions across care environments. Stroke2008; 39: 2637–2643.
7.
Visser-MeilyAvan HeugtenCPostMSchepersVLindemanE. Intervention studies for caregivers of stroke survivors: a critical review. Patient Educ Couns2005; 56: 257–267.
8.
SorensenSPinquartMDubersteinP. How effective are interventions with caregivers? An updated meta-analysis. Gerontologist2002; 42: 356–372.
9.
BraithwaiteVMcGownA. Caregivers’ emotional well-being and their capacity to learn about stroke. J Adv Nurs1993; 18: 195–202.
10.
LincolnNBFrancisVMLilleySASharmaJCSummerfieldM. Evaluation of a Stroke Family Support Organiser: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Stroke2003; 34: 116–1121.
11.
RodgersHAtkinsonCBondSSuddesMDobsonRCurlessR. Randomized controlled trial of a comprehensive stroke education program for patients and caregivers. Stroke1999; 30: 2585–2591.
12.
DennisMO’RourkeSSlatteryJStaniforthTWarlowC. Evaluation of a stroke family care worker: results of a randomised controlled trial. Br Med J1997; 314: 1071–1076.
13.
EvansRLMatlockALBishopDSStranahanSPedersonC. Family intervention after stroke: does counseling or education help?Stroke1988; 19: 1243–1249.
14.
GrantJSElliottTRWeaverMBartolucciAAGigerJN. Telephone Intervention With Family Caregivers of Stroke Survivors After Rehabilitation. Stroke2002; 33: 2060–2065.
15.
van den HeuvelETWitteLPStewartRESchureLMSandermanRMeyboom-de JongB. Long-term effects of a group support program and an individual support program for informal caregivers of stroke patients: which caregivers benefit the most?Patient Educ Couns2002; 47: 291–299.
16.
GrantJS. Social problem-solving partnerships with family caregivers. Rehabil Nurs1999; 24: 254–260.
17.
Boter H, for the HESTIA Study Group. Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of an Outreach Nursing Support Program for Recently Discharged Stroke Patients. Stroke2004; 35: 2867–2872.
18.
CameronJIGignacMA. “Timing It Right”: A Conceptual Framework for Addressing the Support Needs of Family Caregivers to Stroke Survivors from the Hospital to the Home. Patient Educ Couns2008; 70: 305–314.
19.
CameronJINaglieGSilverFLGignacMA. Stroke family caregivers’ support needs change across the care continuum: a qualitative study using the timing it right framework. Disabil Rehabil2013; 35: 315–324.
20.
CohenSUnderwoodLGGottliebBH. Social Support Measurement and Intervention. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2000.
21.
CreswellJPlano ClarkV. Designing and conducting mixed methods research: Second edition. 2nd ed.California: Sage Publications, Inc., 2011.
22.
CameronJIHerridgeMSTanseyCMMcAndrewsMPCheungAM. Well-being in informal caregivers of survivors of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med2006; 34: 81–86.
23.
CameronJIStewartDEStreinerDLCoytePCCheungAM. What makes family caregivers happy during the first 2 years post stroke?Stroke2014; 45: 1084–1089.
24.
CameronJICheungAMStreinerDLCoytePCStewartDE. Stroke survivor depressive symptoms are associated with family caregiver depression during the first 2 years poststroke. Stroke2011; 42: 302–306.
25.
SherbourneCDStewartAL. The MOS Social Support Survey. Soc Sci Med1991; 32: 705–714.
26.
WatsonDClarkLATellegenA. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol1988; 54: 1063–1070.
27.
RadloffLS. The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement1977; 1: 385–401.
28.
SullivanKDuntonNJ. Development and validation of the stroke knowledge test. Top Stroke Rehabil2004; 11: 19–28.
29.
CameronJIFrancheRLCheungAMStewartDE. Lifestyle interference and emotional distress in family caregivers of advanced cancer patients. Cancer2002; 94: 521–527.
30.
CameronJICheungAMStreinerDLCoytePCStewartDE. Stroke survivors’ behavioral and psychologic symptoms are associated with informal caregivers’ experiences of depression. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2006; 87: 177–183.
31.
PearlinLISchoolerC. The structure of coping. J Health Soc Behav1978; 19: 2–21.
32.
SturgesJEHanrahanKJ. Comparing telephone and face-to-face qualitative interviewing: a research note. Qual Res2004; 4: 107–118.
33.
RabieeF. Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proc Nutr Soc2004; 63: 655–660.
34.
RitchieJSpencerL. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: BrymanABurgessRG (eds). Analyzing qualitative data. New York, NY: Routledge, 1994. pp. 173–94.
35.
CameronJINaglieGGignacMABayleyMWarnerGGreenT. Randomized clinical trial of the timing it right stroke family support program: research protocol. BMC Health Serv Res2014; 14: 18.
36.
SingerJDWillettJB. Applied longitudinal data analysis: modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc., 2003.
37.
PetkovaETeresiJ. Some statistical issues in the analyses of data from longitudinal studies of elderly chronic care populations. Psychosom Med2002; 64: 531–547.
38.
HsiehHFShannonSE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res2005; 15: 1277–1288.
39.
McReynoldsCJKochLCRumrillPDJr.Spearking of Research. Qualitative research strategies in rehabilitation. Work2001; 16: 57–65.
40.
NVivo qualitative data analysis software. Version 10.0 QSR International Pty Ltd.; 2012.
41.
KalraLEvansAPerezIMelbournAPatelAKnappM. Training carers of stroke patients: randomised controlled trial. BMJ20048; 328: 1099.
42.
TorpSHansonEHaugeSUlsteinIMagnussonL. A pilot study of how information and communication technology may contribute to health promotion among elderly spousal carers in Norway. Health Soc Care Community2008; 16: 75–85.
43.
PierceLLSteinerVLKhuderSAGovoniALHornLJ. The effect of a Web-based stroke intervention on carers’ well-being and survivors’ use of healthcare services. Disabil Rehabil2009; 31: 1676–1684.
44.
KimJILeeSKimJH. Effects of a web-based stroke education program on recurrence prevention behaviors among stroke patients: a pilot study. Health Educ Res2013; 28: 488–501.
45.
ForsterADickersonJYoungJPatelAKalraLNixonJ. A structured training programme for caregivers of inpatients after stroke (TRACS): a cluster randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet2013; 382: 2069–2076.
46.
BoeleFWHoebenWHilverdaKLentingJCalisALSizooEM. Enhancing quality of life and mastery of informal caregivers of high-grade glioma patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Neurooncol2013; 111: 303–311.
47.
SmithGCEgbertNlman-JenkinsMNannaKPalmieriPA. Reducing depression in stroke survivors and their informal caregivers: a randomized clinical trial of a Web-based intervention. Rehabil Psychol2012; 57: 196–206.
48.
van den HeuvelETde WitteLPNooyen-HaazenISandermanRMeyboom-de JongB. Short-term effects of a group support program and an individual support program for caregivers of stroke patients. Patient Educ Couns2000; 40: 109–20.
