Although cognitive impairments are common following stroke, there is considerable uncertainty about the types of interventions that can reduce activity restrictions and improve quality of life. Indeed, a recent project to identify priorities for research into life after stroke determined that the top priority for patients, carers and health professionals was how to improve cognitive impairments.
Objective:
To provide an overview of the evidence for the effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation for patients with stroke and to determine the main gaps in the current evidence base.
Methods:
Evidence was synthesised for the six Cochrane reviews relating to rehabilitation for post-stroke cognitive impairment and any subsequently published randomized controlled trials to February 2012.
Results:
Data arising from 44 trials involving over 1500 patients was identified. Though there was support for the effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation for some cognitive impairments, significant gaps were found in the current evidence base. All of the Cochrane reviews identified major limitations within the evidence they identified.
Conclusions:
There is currently insufficient research evidence, or evidence of insufficient quality, to support clear recommendations for clinical practice. Recommendations are made as to the research required to strengthen the evidence base, and so facilitate the delivery of effective interventions to individuals with cognitive impairment after stroke.
NysGMSVan ZandvoortMJEDe KortPLMJansenBPWDe HaanEHFKappelleLJ. Cognitive disorders in acute stroke: Prevalence and clinical determinants. Cerebrovasc Dis2007; 23: 408–416.
2.
HurfordRCharidimouAFoxZCipolottiLWerringDJ. Domain-specific trends in cognitive impairment after acute ischaemic stroke. J Neurol2013; 260: 237–241.
3.
StephensSKennyRARowanE. Neuropsychological characteristics of mild vascular cognitive impairment and dementia after stroke. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry2004; 19: 1053–1057.
4.
GillespieDCBowenAFosterJK. Memory impairment following right hemisphere stroke: A comparative meta-analytic and narrative review. Clin Neuropsychol2006; 20: 59–75.
5.
BowenAMcKennaKTallisRC. Reasons for variability in the reported rate of occurrence of unilateral spatial neglect after stroke. Stroke1999; 30: 1196–1202.
6.
EdmansJALincolnNB. The frequency of perceptual deficits after stroke. Clin Rehabil1987; 1: 273–281.
7.
StamenovaVRoyEABlackSE. Associations and dissociations of transitive and intransitive gestures in left and right hemisphere stroke patients. Brain Cogn2010; 72: 483–490.
8.
BourARasquinSLimburgMVerheyF. Depressive symptoms and executive functioning in stroke patients: A follow-up study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry2011; 26: 679–686.
9.
HochstenbachJMulderTVan LimbeekJDondersRSchoonderwaldtH. Cognitive decline following stroke: A comprehensive study of cognitive decline following stroke. J Clin Exp Neuropsyc1998; 20: 503–517.
10.
DouiriARuddAGWolfeCDA. Prevalence of cognitive impairment. South London Stroke Register 1995–2010. Stroke2013; 44: 138–145.
11.
Barker-ColloSLFeiginVLLawesCMMParagVSeniorH. Attention deficits after incident stroke in the acute period: Frequency across types of attention and relationships to patient characteristics and functional outcomes. Top Stroke Rehabil2010; 37: 463–476.
12.
MitchellAJKempSBenito-LeonJReuberM. The influence of cognitive impairment on health-related quality of life in neurological disease. Acta Neuropsychiatr2010; 22: 2–13.
13.
McKevittCFudgeNRedfernJ. Self-reported long-term needs after stroke. Stroke2011; 42: 1398–1403.
14.
CappaSFBenkeTClarkeSRossiBStemmerBVan HeugtenCM. Cognitive rehabilitation. In: GilhusNEBarnesMPBraininM (eds) European handbook of neurological management. 2nd ed.Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011, pp.545–568.
15.
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Management of patients with stroke: Rehabilitation, prevention and management of complications, and discharge planning, 2010. SIGN Publication 118.
16.
Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party (ICSWP). National clinical guideline for stroke. 4th ed.London: Royal College of Physicians, 2012.
17.
PollockASt GeorgeBFentonMFirkinsL. Top ten research priorities relating to life after stroke. Lancet Neurol2012; 11: 209.
18.
LoetscherTLincolnNB. Cognitive rehabilitation for attention deficits following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2013; 5: CD002842.
19.
SturmWWillmesK. Efficacy of a reaction training on various attentional and cognitive functions in stroke patients. Neuropsychol Rehabil1991; 1: 259–280.
20.
SchottkeH. Rehabilitation of attention deficits after stroke – efficacy of a neuropsychological training program for attention deficits. Verhaltenstherapie1997; 7: 21–23.
21.
RohringSKulkeHReulbachUPeetzHSchuppW. Effectivity of a neuropsychological training in attention functions by a teletherapeutic setting. Neurologie und Rehabilitation2004; 10: 239–246.
22.
WesterbergHJacobaeusHHirvikoskiT. Computerized working memory training after stroke – a pilot study. Brain Injury2007; 21: 21–29.
23.
Barker-ColloSLFeiginVLLawesCMParagVSeniorHRodgersA. Reducing attention deficits after stroke using Attention Process Training: A randomized controlled trial. Stroke2009; 40: 3293–3298.
24.
WinkensIVan HeugtenCMWadeDTHabetsEJFasottiL. Efficacy of time pressure management in stroke patients with slowed information processing: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2009; 90: 1672–1679.
25.
Das NairRLincolnN. Cognitive rehabilitation for memory deficits following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2007; 3: CD002293.
26.
DoornheinKDe HaanE. Cognitive training for memory deficits in stroke patients. Neuropsychol Rehabil1998; 8: 393–400.
27.
KaschelRDella SallaSCantagalloAFahlbockALaaksonenRKazenM. Imagery mnemonics for the rehabilitation of memory: A randomised group controlled trial. Neuropsychol Rehabil2002; 12: 127–153.
28.
FishJManlyTEmslieHEvansJJWilsonBA. Compensatory strategies for acquired disorders of memory and planning: Differential effects of a paging system for patients with brain injury of traumatic versus cerebrovascular aetiology. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2008; 79: 930–935.
29.
BowenAHazeltonCPollockALincolnNB. Cognitive rehabilitation for spatial neglect following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2013; 7: CD003586.
30.
WeinbergJDillerLGordonW. Visual scanning training effect on reading-related tasks in acquired brain damage. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1977; 58: 479–486.
31.
CottamGL. Visual scanning training for right hemisphere stroke patients exhibiting hemispatial neglect. Dissertation, University of Mississippi, USA, 1987.
32.
RobertsonIGrayJPentlandBWaiteL. Microcomputer-based rehabilitation for unilateral left visual neglect: a randomised controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1990; 71: 663–668.
33.
FanthomeYLincolnNDrummondAWalkerM. The treatment of visual neglect using feedback of eye movements: a pilot study. Disabil Rehabil1995; 17: 413–417.
34.
WiartLBon Saint ComeADebellaixX. Unilateral neglect syndrome rehabilitation by trunk rotation and scanning training. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1997; 78: 424–429.
35.
EdmansJAWebsterJLincolnNB. A comparison of two approaches in the treatment of perceptual problems after stroke. Clin Rehabil2000; 14: 230–243.
36.
CherneyLRHalperASPapachronisD. Two approaches to treating unilateral neglect after right hemisphere stroke: a preliminary investigation. Top Stroke Rehabil2003; 9: 22–33.
37.
RusconiMLMeineckeCSbrissaPBernardiniB. Different cognitive trainings in the rehabilitation of visuo-spatial neglect. Europa Medicophysica2002; 38: 159–166.
38.
Leukkainen-MarkkulaRTarkkaaIMPittanenaKSiveniusaJHamalainenH. Rehabilitation of hemispatial neglect: a randomized study using either arm activation or visual scanning training. Restor Neurol Neuros2009; 27: 663–672.
39.
FerreiraHPLopesMALLuizRRCardosoLAndreC. Is visual scanning better than mental practice in hemispatial neglect? Results from a pilot study. Top Stroke Rehabil2011; 18: 155–161.
40.
WelfringerALeifert-FiebachGBabinskyRBrandtT. Visuomotor imagery as a new tool in the rehabilitation of neglect: a randomised controlled study of feasibility and efficacy. Disabil Rehabil2011; 33: 2033–2043.
41.
KerkhoffGKellerIArtingerF. Recovery from auditory and visual neglect after optokinetic stimulation with pursuit eye movements – transient modulation and enduring treatment effects. Neuropsychologia2012; 50: 1164–1177.
42.
RossiPKheyfetsSRedingM. Fresnel prisms improve visual perception in stroke patients with homonymous hemianopia or unilateral visual neglect. Neurology1990; 40: 1597–1599.
43.
KalraLPerezIGuptaSWhittinkM. The influence of visual neglect on stroke rehabilitation. Stroke1997; 28: 1386–1391.
44.
RobertsonIHMcMillanTMMacLeodEEdgeworthJBrockD. Rehabilitation by limb activation reduces left-sided motor impairment in unilateral neglect patients: a single-blind randomised control trial. Neuropsychol Rehabil2002; 12: 439–454.
45.
ZeloniGFarneABacciniM. Viewing less to see better. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2002; 73: 195–198.
46.
FongKNKChanMKLNgPPK. The effect of voluntary trunk rotation and half-field eye-patching for patients with unilateral neglect in stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil2007; 21: 729–741.
47.
NysGMSDe HaanEHFKunnemanADe KortPLMDijkermanHC. Acute neglect rehabilitation using repetitive prism adaptation: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Restor Neurol Neuros2008; 26: 1–12.
48.
TsangMHMSzeKHFongKNK. Occupational therapy treatment with right half-field eye-patching for patients with subacute stroke and unilateral neglect: a randomised controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil2009; 31: 630–637.
49.
TurtonAJO’LearyKGabbJWoodwardRGilchristI. A single blinded randomised controlled pilot trial of prism adaptation for improving self-care in stroke patients with neglect. Neuropsychol Rehabil2010; 20: 180–196.
50.
MizunoKTsujiTTakebayashiTFujiwaraTHaseKLiuM. Prism adaptation therapy enhances rehabilitation of stroke patients with unilateral spatial neglect: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehab Neural Repair2011; 25: 711–720.
51.
SchroderAWistERHombergV. TENS and optokinetic stimulation in neglect therapy after cerebrovascular accident: a randomized controlled study. Eur J Neurol2008; 15: 922–927.
52.
PolanowskaKSeniowJLesniakMCzionkowskaA. Left-hand somatosensory stimulation combined with visual scanning training in rehabilitation for post-stroke hemineglect: a randomised, double-blind study. Neuropsychol Rehabil2009; 19: 364–382.
53.
BowenAKnappPGillespieDNicolsonDNVailA. Non-pharmacological interventions for perceptual disorders following stroke and other adult, acquired, non-progressive brain injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2011; 4: CD007039.
54.
MazerBSoferSKorner-BitenskyNGelinasIHanleyJWood-DauphineeS. Effectiveness of a visual attention retraining programme on the driving performance of clients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2003; 84: 541–550.
55.
TaylorMMSchaefferJNBlumenthalFSGrisellJL. Perceptual training in patients with left hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1971; 52: 163–169.
56.
LincolnNBWhitingSECockburnJBhavnaniG. An evaluation of perceptual retraining. Int Rehab Med1985; 7: 99–101.
57.
HajekVEKatesMHDonnellyRMcGreeS. The effect of visuo-spatial training in patients with right hemisphere stroke. Canad J Rehabil1993; 6: 175–186.
58.
DiretteDKHinojosaJCarnevaleGJ. Comparison of remedial and compensatory interventions for adults with acquired brain injuries. J Head Trauma Rehab1999; 14: 595–601.
59.
WestCBowenAHeskethAVailA. Interventions for motor apraxia following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2008; 1: CD004132.
60.
SmaniaNGirardiFDomenicaliCLoraEAgliotiS. The rehabilitation of limb apraxia: a study in left-brain-damaged patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2000; 81: 379–388.
61.
DonkervoortMDekkerJStehmann-SarisFCDeelmanBG. Efficacy of strategy training in left hemisphere stroke patients with apraxia: a randomised clinical trial. Neuropsychol Rehabil2001; 11: 549–566.
62.
ChungCSPollockACampbellTDurwardBRHagenS. Cognitive rehabilitation for executive dysfunction in adults with stroke or other adult non-progressive acquired brain damage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2013; 4: CD008391.
63.
HuXDouZZhuHWanGLiJ. The single blind procedure research of cognitive rehabilitation interventions on cognitive deficits in patients with stroke. Chinese Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation2003; 7: 1521–1523.
64.
JorgeREAcionLMoserDAdamsHPRobinsonRG. Escitalopram and enhancement of cognitive recovery following stroke. Arch Gen Psychiat2010; 67: 187–196.
65.
CarterLTCarusoJLLanguirandMBerardMA. Cognitive skill remediation in stroke and non-stroke elderly. Clin Neuropsychol1980; 2: 109–113.
66.
ChungCSY. The effectiveness of video-feedback in acute stroke rehabilitation: a pilot study. MSc Thesis, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK, 2007.
67.
Van HeugtenCWolters GregorioGWadeD. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation after acquired brain injury: A systematic review of content of treatment. Neuropsychol Rehabil2012; 22: 653–673.
68.
CiceroneKDLangenbahnDMBradenC. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: Updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2011; 92: 519–530.
69.
ThorpeKEZwarensteinMOxmanAD. A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): A tool to help trial designers. J Clin Epidemiol2009; 62: 464–475.
70.
CraigPDieppePMacintyreSMitchieSNazarethIPetticrewM. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ2008; 337: a1655.
71.
Barker-ColloSL. Depression and anxiety 3 months post stroke: Prevalence and correlates. Arch Clin Neuropsychol2007; 22: 519–531.
72.
PohjasvaaraTVatajaRLeppavouriAKasteMErkinjunttiT. Cognitive functions and depression as predictors of poor outcome 15 months after stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis2002; 14: 228–233.
73.
KimuraMRobinsonRGKosierJT. Treatment of cognitive impairment after poststroke depression: A double-blind treatment study. Stroke2000; 31: 1482–1486.
74.
NarushimaKParadisoSMoserDJJorgeRRobinsonRG. Effect of antidepressant on executive function after stroke. Brit J Psychiat2007; 190: 260–265.
75.
McKevittCRedfernJMoldFWolfeC. Qualitative studies of stroke: A systematic review. Stroke2004; 35: 1499–1505.
76.
BrewinCRBradleyC. Patient preferences and randomised clinical trials. BMJ1989; 299: 313–315.
77.
LincolnNBKneeboneIIMacNivenJABMorrisRC. Psychological management of stroke. Chichester: Wiley, 2012.
78.
DrummondMFSculpherMJTorranceGWO’BrienBJStoddartGL. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 3rd ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
79.
BradyMCStottDJNorrieJ. Developing and evaluating the implementation of a complex intervention: Using mixed methods to inform the design of a randomised controlled trial of an oral healthcare intervention after stroke. Trials2011; 12: 168.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
