To summarize and critically appraise the evidence related to power mobility use in children (18 years or younger) with mobility limitations.
Data sources:
Searches were performed in 12 electronic databases along with hand searching for articles published in English to September 2012 and updated February 2014.
Review methods:
The search was restricted to quantitative studies including at least one child with a mobility limitation and measuring an outcome related to power mobility device use. Articles were appraised using American Academy of Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine (AACPDM) criteria for group and single-subject designs. The PRISMA statement was followed with inclusion criteria set a priori. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full-text articles. AACPDM quality ratings were completed for levels I-III studies.
Results:
Of 259 titles, 29 articles met inclusion criteria, describing 28 primary research studies. One study, rated as strong level II evidence, supported positive impact of power mobility on overall development as well as independent mobility. Another study, rated as moderate level III evidence, supported positive impact on self-initiated movement. Remaining studies, rated evidence levels IV and V, provided support for a positive impact on a broad range of outcomes from to International Classification of Functioning (ICF) components of body structure and function, activity and participation. Some studies suggest that environmental factors may be influential in successful power mobility use and skill development.
Conclusion:
The body of evidence supporting outcomes for children using power mobility is primarily descriptive rather than experimental in nature, suggesting research in this area is in its infancy.
UchiyamaIAndersonDICamposJJ. Locomotor experience affects self and emotion. Dev Psychol2008;44(5):1225–1231.
3.
GuerettePTefftDFurumasuJ. Pediatric powered wheelchairs: results of a national survey of providers. Assist Technol2005;17(2):144–158.
4.
NicholsonJBonsallM. Powered mobility for children under five years of age in England. Br J Occup Ther2002;65(6):291–293.
5.
StaindiffeS. Wheelchair services and providers: discriminating against disabled children?Int J Ther Rehabil2003;10(4):151–158.
6.
PalisanoRJTiemanBLWalterSD. Effect of environmental setting on mobility methods of children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol2003;45(2):113–120.
7.
Rodby-BousquetEHägglundG. Use of manual and powered wheelchair in children with cerebral palsy: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatr2010;10(1):10–59.
8.
DuganLMCampbellPHWilcoxMJ. Making decisions about assistive technology with infants and toddlers. T Early Child Spec Educ2006;26(1):25–32.
9.
RagonesiCChenXAgrawalSGallowayJ. Power mobility and socialization in preschool: a case study of a child with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther2010;22(3):322–329.
10.
RagonesiCGallowayJ. Short-term, early intensive power mobility training. Pediatr Phys Ther2012;24(2):141–148.
11.
LoboMAHarbourneRTDusingSCMcCoySW. Grounding early intervention: physical therapy cannot just be about motor skills anymore. Phys Ther2013;93(1):94–103.
12.
WiartLDarrahJ. Changing philosophical perspectives on the management of children with physical disabilities: their effect on the use of powered mobility. Disabil Rehabil2002;24(9):492–498.
13.
WiartLDarrahJHollisVCookAMayL. Mothers’ perceptions of their children’s use of powered mobility. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr2004;24(4):3–21.
14.
CaseyJPalegGLivingstoneR. Facilitating child participation through power mobility. Br J Occup Ther2013;76(3):157–159.
15.
DijkersMPBushnikTHeinemannAW. Systematic reviews for informing rehabilitation practice: an introduction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2012;93(5):912–918.
16.
HendersonSSkeltonHRosenbaumP. Assistive devices for children with functional impairments: impact on child and caregiver function. Dev Med Child Neurol2008;50(2):89–98.
17.
BottosMBolcatiCSciutoLRuggeriCFeliciangeliA. Powered wheelchairs and independence in young children with tetraplegia. Dev Med Child Neurol2001;43(11):769–777.
18.
ButlerCOkamotoGMcKayT. Powered mobility for very young disabled children. Dev Med Child Neurol1983;25(4):472–474.
19.
ButlerCOkamotoGMcKayT. Motorized wheelchair driving by disabled children. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1984;65(2):95–97.
20.
DeitzJSwinthYWhiteO. Powered mobility and preschoolers with complex developmental delays. Am J Occup Ther2002;56(1):86–96.
21.
DouglasJRyanM. A preschool severely disabled boy and his powered wheelchair: a case study. Child Care Health Dev1987;13(5):303–309.
22.
JonesMMcEwenIHansenL. Use of power mobility for a young child with spinal muscular atrophy. Phys Ther2003;83(3):253–262.
23.
Rousseau-HarrisonKRochetteA. Impacts of wheelchair acquisition on children from a person-occupation-environment interactional perspective. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol2013;8(1):1–10.
24.
LepageCNoreauLBernardP. Association between characteristics of locomotion and accomplishment of life habits in children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther1998;78(5):458–469.
25.
TefftDGuerettePFurumasuJ. The impact of early powered mobility on parental stress, negative emotions, and family social interactions. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr2011;31(1):4–15.
26.
SkarL. Disabled children’s perceptions of technical aids, assistance and peers in play situations. Scand J Caring Sci2002;16(1):27–33.
27.
NicolsonAMoirLMillsteedJ. Impact of assistive technology on family caregivers of children with physical disabilities: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol2012;7(5):350–355.
28.
OstensjøSCarlbergEBVøllestadN. The use and impact of assistive devices and other environmental modifications on everyday activities and care in young children with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil2005;27(14):849–861.
29.
World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability & Health (ICF), 2001.
30.
World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health - Children and Youth, 2007.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJAltmanD. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med2009;6(6):e1000097.
34.
McConachieHColverAFForsythRJJarvisSNParkinsonKN. Participation of disabled children: how should it be characterised and measured?Disabil Rehabil2006;28(18):1157–1164.
35.
CosterWKhetaniMA. Measuring participation of children with disabilities: issues and challenges. Disabil Rehabil2008;30(8):639–648.
36.
DunawaySMontesJO’HagenJSprouleDMDe VivoDCKaufmannP. Independent mobility after early introduction of a power wheelchair in spinal muscular atrophy. J Child Neurol2012;28(5):576–582.
37.
CooperRTolericoMKaminskiBSpaethDDingDCooperR. Quantifying wheelchair activity of children: a pilot study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2008;87(12):977–983.
38.
ButlerC. Effects of powered mobility on self-initiated behaviors of very young children with locomotor disability. Dev Med Child Neurol1986;28(3):325–332.
39.
GallowayJRyuJ-CAgrawalS. Babies driving robots: Self-generated mobility in very young infants. Intell Serv Robot2008;1(2):123–134.
40.
GuerettePFurumasuJTefftD. The positive effects of early powered mobility on children’s psychosocial and play skills. Assist Technol2013;25(1):39–48.
41.
HuhnKGuarrera-BowlbyPDeutschJ. The clinical decision-making process of prescribing power mobility for a child with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther2007;19(3):254–260.
42.
HorneAHamR. Provision of powered mobility equipment to young children: the Whizz-Kidz experience. Int J Ther Rehabil2003;10(11):511–517.
43.
JonesMMcEwenINeasB. Effects of power wheelchairs on the development and function of young children with severe motor impairments. Pediatr Phys Ther2012;24(2):131–140.
44.
LynchARyuJ-CAgrawalSGallowayJ. Power mobility training for a 7-month-old infant with spina bifida. Pediatr Phys Ther2009;21(4):362–368.
45.
NisbetP. Assessment and training of children for powered mobility in the UK. Technol Disabil2002;14:173–182.
46.
RagonesiCChenXAgrawalSGallowayJ. Power mobility and socialization in preschool: Follow-up case study of a child with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther2011;23(4):399–406.
47.
WiartLDarrahJCookAHollisVMayL. Evaluation of powered mobility use in home and community environments. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr2003;23(2):59–75.
48.
BarfieldJPMaloneLCollinsJMRubleSB. Disability type influences heart rate response during power wheelchair sport. Med Sci Sport Exerc2005;37(5):718–723.
49.
BenedictRLeeJMarrujoSFarelA. Assistive devices as an early childhood intervention: Evaluating outcomes. Technol Disabil1999;11:79–90.
50.
EverardL. The wheelchair toddler. Health Visit1984;57(8):241–242.
51.
McGarrySMoirLGirdlerS. The smart wheelchair: Is it an appropriate mobility training tool for children with physical disabilities?Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol2012;7(5):372–380.
52.
NisbetPCraigJOdorPAitkenS. “Smart” wheelchairs for mobility training. Technol Disabil1996;5(1):49–62.
53.
PopePBowesCBoothE. Postural control in sitting the SAM system: Evaluation of use over three years. Dev Med Child Neurol1994;36(3):241–252.
54.
JohnstonMVDijkersMP. Toward improved evidence standards and methods for rehabilitation: recommendations and challenges. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2012;93(8 Suppl):S185–199.
55.
NilssonLNybergP. Driving to learn: a new concept for training children with profound cognitive disabilities in a powered wheelchair. Am J Occup Ther2003;57(2):229–233.
56.
PaulssonKChristoffersonM. Psychosocial aspects on technical aids - How does independent mobility affect the psychosocial and intellectual development of children with physical disabilities? In: 2nd international conference on rehabilitation engineering Ottawa, Ottawa, 1984, pp.282–286. Washington DC: RESNA.
57.
FurumasuJGuerettePTefftD. The development of a powered wheelchair mobility program for young children. Technol Disabil1996;5(1):41–48.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
