Does self-efficacy influence recovery and well-being in osteoarthritis patients undergoing joint replacement? A systematic review

Abstract

Objective:

To investigate the role of self-efficacy in functional recovery and well-being outcomes in osteoarthritis patients, undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery.

Data sources:

Studies were identified using MEDLINE via PUB med, PsycINFO and CINAHL from inception to July 2013.

Methods:

Three search strategies that combined key terms of ‘self-efficacy’, ‘functional recovery’, ‘well-being’ and ‘joint replacement’ were applied. Titles and abstracts were screened for eligibility and, accordingly, potentially eligible studies were retrieved for review. Included studies were assessed in terms of their quality, and data were extracted by two independent reviewers. A narrative synthesis of results was conducted.

Results:

In total, 836 articles were identified and after electronic de-duplication, 708 articles remained. After screening 15 articles were retrieved as potentially eligible and eight articles were included in the review. Of the eight studies (n = 967 patients), seven had a prospective design and all studies were considered of good quality. No fully conclusive evidence for the influence of self-efficacy upon functional recovery outcomes was found. When the timing of self-efficacy measurement was examined, post-operative self-efficacy was found to be related to functional recovery outcomes.

Conclusion:

Presurgical self-efficacy was the least consistent predictor of functional outcomes while postoperative self-efficacy was more consistently associated with recovery outcomes such as longer distance ambulation, exercise repetition and frequency, walking speed and disability.

Keywords

Joint replacement functional outcome recovery self-efficacy systematic review well-being

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Wylde

Dieppe

Hewlett

Total knee replacement: Is it really an effective procedure at all?

The Knee 2007; 14: 417–423.

Judge

Cooper

Williams

Patient-reported outcomes one year after primary hip replacement in a European collaborative study. Arthritis Care Res 2010; 62: 480–488.

Bandura

. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977; 84: 191–215.

Marks

. Physical and psychological correlates of disability among a cohort of individuals with knee osteoarthritis. Can J Aging 2007; 26: 367–378.

Fortinsky

Bohannon

Litt

Rehabilitation therapy self-efficacy and functional recovery after hip fracture. Int J Rehabil Res 2002; 25: 241–246.

Korpershoek

Van Der Bijl

Hafsteinsdóttir

. Self-efficacy and its influence on recovery of patients with stroke: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2011; 67: 1876–1894.

Rosenberger

Jokl

Ickovics

. Psychosocial factors and surgical outcomes: an evidence-based literature review. J Am Acad Orthop Sur 2006; 14: 397–405.

Bandura

. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Am Psychol 1982; 37: 122–147.

Vissers

Bussmann

Verhaar

Psychological factors affecting the outcome of total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheu 2012; 41: 576–588.

10.

Haanstra

Van den Berg

Ostelo

Systematic review: Do patient expectations influence treatment outcomes in total knee and total hip arthroplasty?

Health Qual Life Out 2012; 10: 152.

11.

Altman

. Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables. Brit Med J 2001; 323: 224.

12.

Belo

Berger

Reijman

Prognostic factors of progression of osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review of observational studies. Arthritis Care Res 2007; 57: 13–26.

13.

Scholten-Peeters

Gwendolijne

Verhagen

Prognostic factors of whiplash-associated disorders: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies. Pain 2003; 1: 303–322.

14.

Jack

McLean

Moffett

Barriers to treatment adherence in physiotherapy outpatient clinics: A systematic review. Manual Ther 2010; 15: 220–228.

15.

Kuijpers

Van der Windt

Van der Heijden

Systematic review of prognostic cohort studies on shoulder disorders. Pain 2005; 109(3): 420–431.

16.

Liberati

Altman

Tetzlaff

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009; 339: 270.

17.

Landis

Koch

. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159–174.

18.

Van den Akker-Scheek

Stevens

Groothoff

Preoperative or postoperative self-efficacy: Which is a better predictor of outcome after total hip or knee arthroplasty?

Patient Educ Couns 2007; 66: 92–99.

19.

Hartley

Vance

Elliott

Hope, self-efficacy, and functional recovery after knee and hip replacement surgery. Rehabil Psychol 2008; 53: 521–529.

20.

Orbell

Johnston

Rowley

Self-efficacy and goal importance in the prediction of physical disability in people following hospitalization: a prospective study. Br J Health Psychol 2001; 6: 25–40.

21.

Moon

Backer

. Relationships among self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, and postoperative behaviors in total joint replacement patients. Orthop Nurs 2000; 19: 77–85.

22.

Wylde

Dixon

Blom

. The role of preoperative self-efficacy in predicting outcome after total knee replacement. Muscoskel Care 2012; 10: 110–118.

23.

Riddle

Wade

Jiranek

Preoperative pain catastrophizing predicts pain outcome after knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468: 798–806.

24.

Engel

Hamilton

Potter

Impact of two types of expectancy on recovery from total knee replacement surgery (TKR) in adults with osteoarthritis. Behav Med 2004; 30: 113–123.

25.

Lopez-Olivo

Landon

Siff

Psychosocial determinants of outcomes in knee replacement. Ann Rheum Dis 2011; 70: 1775–1781.

26.

Waldrop

Lightsey

Ethington

Self-efficacy, optimism, health competence and recovery from orthopedic surgery. J Couns Psychol 2001; 48: 233–238.

27.

Mueller

Hartmann

Mueller

Validation of the arthritis self-efficacy short form scale in German fibromyalgia patients. Eur J Pain 2003; 7: 163–171.

28.

Lorig

Chastain

Ung

Development and evaluation of a scale to measure the perceived self-efficacy of people with arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1989; 32: 37–44.

29.

González

Stewart

Ritter

Translation and validation of arthritis outcome measures into Spanish. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38: 1429–1446.

30.

Nicholas

. The pain self-efficacy questionnaire: Taking pain into account. Eur J Pain 2007; 11: 153–163.

31.

Oetker-Black

Taunton

. Evaluation of a self-efficacy scale for preoperative patients. AORN J 1994: 60: 43–50.

32.

Bellamy

Buchanan

Goldsmith

Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988; 15: 1833–1840.

33.

Harris

. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: Treatment by mold replacement. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg 1969; 51: 737–755.

34.

Insall

Dorr

Scott

Rationale of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; 248: 13–14.

35.

McHorney

Ware

JFR

The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994; 32: 40–66.

36.

Patrick

Peach

(eds). Disablement in the community. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.

37.

Radloff

. The CES–D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psych Meas 1977; 1: 385–401.

38.

Benyon

Hill

Zadurian

Coping strategies and self-efficacy as predictors of outcome in osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Muscoskel Care 2010; 8: 224–236.

39.

Dohnke

Knauper

Muller-Fahrnow

. Perceived self-efficacy gained from, and health effects of, a rehabilitation program after hip joint replacement. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 53: 585–592.

40.

Kurlowicz

. Perceived self-efficacy, functional ability, and depressive symptoms in older elective surgery patients. Nurs Res 1998; 47: 219–226.

41.

Brady

. Measures of self efficacy: Arthritis Self Efficacy Scale (ASES), Arthritis Self Efficacy Scale 8 Item (ASES 8), Children’s Arthritis Self Efficacy Scale (CASE), Chronic Disease Self Efficacy Scale (CDSES), Parent’s Arthritis Self Efficacy Scale (PASE), and Rheumatoid Arthritis Self Efficacy Scale (RASE). Arthritis Care Res 2011; 63: S473–S485.

42.

Hewlett

Cockshott

Kirwan

Development and validation of a self-efficacy scale for use in British patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RASE). Rheumatol 2001; 40: 1221–1230.

43.

O’Brien

Bennett

Doran

Comparison of hip and knee arthroplasty outcomes at early and intermediate follow-up. Orthopedics 2009; 32: 170.

44.

Davis

Perruccio

Ibrahim

The trajectory of recovery and the inter-relationships of symptoms, activity and participation in the first year following total hip and knee replacement. Osteo Arthr Cartilage 2011; 19: 1413–1421.

45.

Johnston

Bonetti

Joice

Recovery from disability after stroke as a target for a behavioural intervention: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29: 1117–1127.

46.

Rottmann

Dalton

Christensen

Self-efficacy, adjustment style and well-being in breast cancer patients: a longitudinal study. Qual Life Res 2010; 19: 827–836.

47.

Fitzgerald

Orav

Lee

Patient quality of life during the 12 months following joint replacement surgery. Arthritis Care Res 2004; 51: 100–109.

48.

Gill

De Morton

McBurney

. An investigation of six measures of physical function in people awaiting joint replacement surgery of the hip or knee. Clin Rehabil 2012; 26: 945–951.

49.

Lindemann

Becker

Muche

Gait analysis and WOMAC are complementary in assessing functional outcome in total hip replacement. Clin Rehabil 2006; 20: 413–420.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.18 MB