Objective: To summarize evidence on effective home programme intervention for adults and describe characteristics of successful home programmes.
Data sources: A search was conducted of MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, DARE, The Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, OTSeeker and Google Scholar and references in manuscripts retrieved.
Review methods: Two independent reviewers determined whether retrieved study abstracts met inclusion criteria: human subjects; adults; home programme intervention; systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials or controlled trials. Included papers were appraised for study design, participants, type and intensity of intervention, and outcomes. Methodological quality of trials was rated using the PEDro scale (1–10 highest).
Results: Thirty-two papers were retrieved (6 systematic reviews, 26 trials). The 23 randomized controlled trials and 3 controlled trials were appraised. All the retrieved papers were level 1a, 1b or 2b evidence. Major findings were: (a) home programme intervention was more effective than no intervention at all; (b) home programme intervention was equally effective to expert-provided therapy, except when therapeutic modalities were used; and (c) different instruction formats produced similar outcomes. Home programmes with favourable outcomes were more likely to: involve the patients in establishing the programme; intervene on the person, task and environment; and provide feedback about progress. Dose did not appear to be related to outcome.
Conclusion: There is grade 1A evidence supporting the effectiveness of home programmes for adults. Home programmes are as effective as expert-provided therapy.
BeardDJDoddCAHome or supervised rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther1998; 27: 134–143.
2.
NovakICusickALanninNOccupational therapy home programs for cerebral palsy: double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics2009; 124: e606–e614.
3.
HallCMBrodyLTTherapeutic exercise: moving towards function2005. Baltimore MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
4.
GoodwinPCMorrisseyMCOmarRZBrownMSouthallKMcAuliffeTBEffectiveness of supervised physical therapy in the early period after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. Phys Ther2003; 83: 520–535.
5.
ElliottMWatsonCWilkinsonEMuskAWLakeFRShort- and long-term hospital and community exercise programmes for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respirology2004; 9: 345–351.
6.
DalalHMZawadaAJollyKHome based versus centre based cardiac rehabilitation: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ2010; 340: b5631–b5631.
7.
CoppolaSMCollinsSMIs physical therapy more beneficial than unsupervised home exercise in treatment of post surgical knee disorders? A systematic review. The Knee2009; 16: 171–175.
8.
CrowleyLThe effectiveness of home exercise programmes for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a review of the literature. Phys Ther Rev2009; 14: 149–159.
9.
AshworthNLChadKEHarrisonELReederBAMarshallSCHome versus center based physical activity programs in older adults (Cochrane review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev2005; Issue 1.
10.
HwangRMarwickTEfficacy of home-based exercise programmes for people with chronic heart failure: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil2009; 16: 527–535.
11.
JollyKTaylorRSLipGYStevensAHome-based cardiac rehabilitation compared with centre-based rehabilitation and usual care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol2006; 111: 343–351.
12.
DeyleGDAllisonSCMatekelRLPhysical therapy treatment effectiveness for osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized comparison of supervised clinical exercise and manual therapy procedures versus a home exercise program. Phys Ther2005; 85: 1301–1317.
13.
CohenHKane-WinelandMMillerLHatfieldCOccupation and visual/vestibular interaction in vestibular rehabilitation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1995; 112: 526–532.
14.
Phillips B, Ball, C, Sackett, D et al. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. Centre for Evidence Based Medicine. Accessed 05 April 2010 from: http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1025.
15.
Higgins JPT, Green S eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.0.2 [updated September 2009]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2009. Accessed from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
16.
LiberatiAAltmanDGTetzlaffJThe PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med2009; 6: e1000100–e1000100.
17.
AksacBAkiSKaranAYalcinOIsikogluMEskiyurtNBiofeedback and pelvic floor exercises for the rehabilitation of urinary stress incontinence. Gynecol Obstet Invest2003; 56: 23–27.
18.
de Freitas FregoneziGAResquetiVRGuellRPradasJCasanPEffects of 8-week, interval-based inspiratory muscle training and breathing retraining in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis. Chest2005; 128: 1524–1530.
19.
HaraYOgawaSTsujiuchiKMuraokaYA home-based rehabilitation program for the hemiplegic upper extremity by power-assisted functional electrical stimulation. Disabil Rehabil2008; 30: 296–304.
20.
JanMHHungJYLinJ-HWangSFLiuTKTangPFEffects of a home program on strength, walking speed, and function after total hip replacement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2004; 85: 1943–1951.
21.
RuhlandJLShieldsRKThe effects of a home exercise program on impairment and health-related quality of life in persons with chronic peripheral neuropathies. Phys Ther1997; 77: 1026–1039.
22.
AshburnAFazakarleyLBallingerCPickeringRMcLellanLDFittonCA randomized controlled trial of a home based exercise programme to reduce the risk of falling among people with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2007; 78: 678–684.
23.
HinmanMRComparison of two short-term balance training programs for community-dwelling older adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther2002; 25: 10–15.
24.
JollyKLipGYHTaylorRSThe Birmingham rehabilitation uptake maximisation study (BRUM): a randomized controlled trial comparing home-based with centre-based cardiac rehabilitation. Heart2009; 95: 36–42.
25.
LessardLAScuddsRAAmendolaAVazMDThe efficacy of cryotherapy following arthroscopic knee surgery. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther1997; 26: 14–22.
26.
OlneySJNymarkJBrouwerBA randomized controlled trial of supervised versus unsupervised exercise programs for ambulatory stroke survivors. Stroke2006; 37: 476–481.
27.
PattersonRBPintoBMarcusBColucciABraunTRobertsMValue of a supervised exercise program for the therapy of arterial claudication. J Vasc Surg1997; 25: 312–319.
28.
PerriMGMartinADLeermakersEASearsSFNotelovitzMEffects of group- versus home-based exercise in the treatment of obesity. J Consult Clin Psychol1997; 65: 278–285.
29.
SalazarAMWardenDLSchwabKCognitive rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury: a randomized trial. Defense and Veterans Head Injury Program (DVHIP) Study Group. JAMA2000; 283: 3075–3081.
30.
SmithSSMacKay-LyonsMNunes-ClementSTherapeutic benefit of aquaerobics for individuals with rheumatoid arthritis. Physiother Can1998; 50: 40–46.
31.
TsuiMLCheingGLThe effectiveness of electroacupuncture versus electrical heat acupuncture in the management of chronic low-back pain. J Altern Complement Med2004; 10: 803–809.
32.
WangACWangYYChenMCSingle-blind, randomized trial of pelvic floor muscle training, biofeedback-assisted pelvic floor muscle training, and electrical stimulation in the management of overactive bladder. Urology2004; 63: 61–66.
33.
BrosseauRJuneauMSirardASafety and feasibility of a self-monitored, home-based phase II exercise program for high risk patients after cardiac surgery. Can J Cardiol1995; 11: 675–685.
34.
CohenHKimballKIncreased independence and decreased vertigo after vestibular rehabilitation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2003; 128: 60–70.
35.
HantenWPOlsonSLButtsNLNowickiALEffectiveness of a home program of ischemic pressure followed by sustained stretch for treatment of myofascial trigger points. Phys Ther2000; 80: 997–1003.
36.
LunVMWileyJPMeeuwisseWHYanagawaTLEffectiveness of patellar bracing for treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome. Clin J Sport Med2005; 15: 235–240.
37.
RoddeyTSOlsonSLGartsmanGMHantenWPCookKFA randomized controlled trial comparing 2 instructional approaches to home exercise instruction following arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair surgery. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther2002; 32: 548–559.
38.
MoseleyAMMaherCHerbertRDSherringtonCReliability of a scale for measuring the methodological quality of clinical trials. Proceedings of the VIIth Cochrane Colloquium1999. Italy,: Rome, 39–39.
39.
MastosMMillerKEliassonACImmsCGoal-directed training: linking therapies of treatment to clinical practice for improved functional activities in daily life. Clin Rehabil2007; 21: 47–55.
40.
World Health Organization (WHO). International classification of functioning, disability and health2001. Geneva: WHO.
41.
AndersonRMFunnellMMButlerPMArnoldMSFitzgeraldJTFesteCCPatient empowerment: results of a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care1995; 18: 943–949.
42.
BodenheimerTLorigKHolmanHGrumbachKPatient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA2002; 288: 2469–2475.
43.
LawMBaptisteSMillsJClient-centred practice: what does it mean and does it make a difference?Can J Occup Ther1995; 62: 250–257.
44.
ZachariaeRPedersenCGJensenABEhrnroothERossenPBvon der MaaseHAssociation of perceived physician communication style with patient satisfaction, distress, cancer-related self-efficacy, and perceived control over the disease. Br J Cancer2003; 88: 658–665.
45.
GuyattGGuttermanDBaumannMHGrading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guidelines: report from an American college of chest physicians task force. Chest2006; 129: 174–181.
46.
DavisJCRobertsonMCAsheMCDoes a home-based strength and balance programme in people aged >= 80 years provide the best value for money to prevent falls? A systematic review of economic evaluations of falls prevention interventions. Br J Sports Med2010; 44: 80–89.
