Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate agreement between independent clinician raters using a triage protocol to prioritize referrals for occupational therapy and physiotherapy within a community rehabilitation program.

Design: The priority category allocated to consecutive referrals by one of six clinicians in the referral office was compared with a second rating made by an independent occupational therapist, blinded to the initial priority rating.

Setting: A centralized referral office staffed by allied health and nursing professionals designed as a single point of access for sub acute and ambulatory services within a large metropolitan health network.

Participants: 214 referrals for adults requiring community based occupational therapy or physiotherapy rehabilitation for orthopaedic, neurological or other conditions (such as falls or cardio-respiratory conditions).

Main Measure: Agreement (weighted kappa = κ_w) between the two ratings.

Results: Overall agreement was moderate (κ_w = 0.60), but disagreement occurred in 30% of cases. Professional discipline of the raters did not affect agreement. Agreement varied between diagnostic subgroups, with significantly lower agreement for referrals for rehabilitation following elective orthopaedic surgery (κ_w = 0.25) than the other categories combined. Differences in agreement were observed between the four triage categories, with the lowest observed agreement in the most urgent category.

Conclusions: Clinicians in a centralized model of triage showed only moderate agreement when making decisions about client priority for community rehabilitation for occupational therapy and physiotherapy.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dutterer LA , Gonzalez MC Triage and prioritization in acute care physical therapy: an evolving process at the hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. Acute Care Persp 1997; 5: 4-6.

Gauthier R. , Straathof T. , Wright S. The Ottawa Hospital Occupational Therapy Prioritization Guidelines. Occup Ther Now 2006; 8: 10-12.

Irion GL Prioritization/triage in acute care physical therapy departments. Acute Care Persp 1997; 5: 1-3.

Christie HJ , Gobert AD , Matthew E. , Rousseau DC , Webber SC Waiting list management strategies for outpatient orthopaedic physical therapy . Physiother Can 1997; 49: 191-205.

Heck CS , Newton J. , Chan A. Weekend physiotherapy service provision: a survey of Toronto area hospitals . Physiother Can 2001; 53: 288-297.

Kot A. , Hanchet S. Addressing the needs of a clinical service in the operational constraints of commissioning. Int J Lang Commun Disord 1998; 33: 66-71.

Lee R. Patient prioritization in rural acute care facilities. Acute Care Persp 1997; 5: 8.

Roberts P. Rationing physiotherapy. Physiotherapy 1996 ; 82: 219-220.

Santiago C. , Stansfield J. Prioritisation in speech and language therapy departments in Scotland and Malaysia. Int J Lang Commun Disord 1998; 33: 102-107.

10.

Harding K. , Taylor N. , Shaw-Stuart L. Triaging patients for allied health services: a systematic review of the literature . Brit J Occ Ther 2009; 72: 153-162.

11.

Harries PA , Gilhooly K. Generic and specialist occupational therapy casework in community mental health teams. Brit J Occ Ther 2003; 66: 101-109.

12.

Leonard C. An evaluation of the prioritisation of referrals by Leeds social services senior occupational therapists. Brit J Occ Ther 1993; 56: 448-450.

13.

Wright C. , Ritson E. An investigation into occupational therapy referral priorities within Kensington and Chelsea social services. Brit J Occ Ther 2001; 64: 393-397.

14.

Michaud M. , Robitaille D. , Tousignant M. Interrater reliability study of a prioritization form for orthopaedic outpatients . Physiother Can 1999; 51: 180-185.

15.

Cunningham C. , Horgan F. , Keane N. , Connolly P. , Mannion A. , O’Neill D. Detection of disability by different members of an interdisciplinary team. Clin Rehabil 1996; 10: 247-254.

16.

Cunningham C. , Horgan F. , O’Neill D. Clinical assessment of rehabilitation potential of the older patient: a pilot study. Clin Rehabil 2000; 14: 205-207.

17.

Norman G. , Streiner D. Biostatistics - The Bare Essentials. Mosby Year Book, Inc ; 1994..

18.

Tooth LR , Ottenbacher KJ The kappa statistic in rehabilitation research: an examination. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1371-1376.

19.

Lowry R. Kappa as a measure of concordance in categorical sorting. New York: Vassar University; 2001 -2009; [cited 2009 June 10th]; Available from: http://faculty.vassar.edu/lowry/kappa.html.

20.

Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960; 20: 37-46.

21.

Sim J. , Wright C. The Kappa Statistic in Reliability Studies: Use, Interpretation, and Sample Size Requirements. Phys Ther 2005; 85: 257-268.

22.

Guscia R. , Harries J. , Kirby N. , Nettlebeck T. Rater bias and the measurement of support needs. J Intellect Dev Disabil 2006; 31: 156-160.

23.

Cooper W. Conceptual similarity as a source of illusory halo in job performance ratings . J Appl Psychol 1981; 60: 302-307.

24.

Bernardin H. , Buckley M. Strategies in rater training. Academy of Management Review 1981; 6: 205-212.

25.

Dowsey M. , Kilgour M. , Santamaria N. , Choong P. Clinical pathways in hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised controlled study. Med J Aust 1999; 170: 59-62.

Prioritizing patients for Community Rehabilitation Services: do clinicians agree on triage decisions?

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References