Objective: To identify psychometrically sound and clinically feasible assessments of arm activities in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy for implementation in research and clinical practice.
Data sources: PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and reference lists of relevant articles were searched.
Review methods: A systematic search was performed based on the following inclusion criteria: (1) evaluative tools at the activity level according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health; (2) previously used in studies including children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy aged 2-18 years; (3) at least one aspect of reliability and validity in children with cerebral palsy should be established. Descriptive information, psychometric properties and clinical utility were reviewed.
Results: Eighteen assessments were identified of which 11 met the inclusion criteria: eight functional tests and three questionnaires. Five functional tests were condition-specific, three were generic. All functional tests measure different aspects of activity, including unimanual capacity and performance during bimanual tasks. The questionnaires obtain information about the child’s abilities at home or school. The reliability and validity have been established, though further use in clinical trials is necessary to determine the responsiveness.
Conclusions: To obtain a complete view of what the child can do and what the child actually does, we advise a capacity-based test (Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function), a performance-based test (Assisting Hand Assessment) and a questionnaire (Abilhand-Kids). This will allow outcome differentiation and treatment guidance for the arm in children with cerebral palsy.
World Health Organization.International classification of functioning, disability and health. ICF. Geneva: WHO, 2001.
3.
Krumlinde-Sundholm L.Choosing and using assessments of hand function . In Eliasson AC, Burtner PA. eds. Improving hand function in children with cerebral palsy. London: MacKeith Press, 2008; 176-97.
4.
Law M.Outcome measures rating form. Ontario, Canada: CanChild Centre for Disability Research, 2004.
5.
Portney LG, Watkins MPFoundations of clinical research - applications to practice, third edition edition. New Jersey: Pearson Education, 2009.
6.
Landis JR, Koch GGThe measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics1977; 33: 159-74.
7.
Weir JPQuantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res2005; 19: 231-40.
8.
Iyer LV, Haley SM, Watkins MP, Dumas HMEstablishing minimal clinically important differences for scores on the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory for inpatient rehabilitation. Phys Ther2003; 83: 888-98.
9.
DeMatteo C., Law M., Russell D., Pollock N., Rosenbaum P., Walter S.Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test. Ontario: Neurodevelopmental Clinical Research Unit, 1992.
10.
Randall M., Johnson L., Reddihough D.The Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function: test administration manual. Melbourne: Royal Children’s Hospital, 1999.
11.
Davids JR, Peace LC, Wagner LV, Gidewall MA, Blackhurst DW, Roberson WMValidation of the Shriners Hospital for Children Upper Extremity Evaluation (SHUEE) for children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am2006; 88: 326-33.
12.
Krumlinde-Sundholm L., Eliasson ACDevelopment of the Assisting Hand Assessment, a Rash-built measure intended for children with unilateral upper limb impairments . Scand J Occup Ther2003; 10: 16-26.
13.
Aarts PB, Jongerius PH, Aarts MA, Van Hartingsveldt MJ, Anderson PG, Beumer A.A pilot study of the Video Observations Aarts and Aarts (VOAA): a new software program to measure motor behaviour in children with cerebral palsy. Occup Ther Int2007; 14: 113-22.
14.
Bruininks RHBruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency. Circle Pines , MS: American Guidance Service, 1978.
Jebsen RH, Taylor N., Trieschmann RB, Trotter MJ, Howard LAAn objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1969; 50: 311-19.
17.
Arnould C., Penta M., Renders A., Thonnard JLABILHAND-Kids: a measure of manual ability in children with cerebral palsy . Neurology2004; 63: 1045-52.
18.
Wallen M., Bundy A., Pont K., Ziviani J.Psychometric properties of the Pediatric Motor Activity Log used for children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol2009; 51: 200-208.
19.
Haley SM, Coster WJ, Ludlow LH, Haltiwanger JT, Andrellos PJPediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Development, standardization and administration manual. Boston, MA: New England Medical Centre, 1992.
20.
Law M., Baptiste S., McColl M., Opzoomer A., Polatajko H., Pollock N.The Canadian occupational performance measure: an outcome measure for occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther1990; 57: 82-87.
21.
Maloney FP, Mirret P., Brooks C., Johannes K.Use of the goal attainment scale in the treatment and ongoing evaluation of neurologically handicapped children. Am J Occup Ther1978; 32: 505-10.
22.
Ottenbacher KJ, Msall ME, Lyon NR, Duffy LC, Granger CV, Braun S.Interrater agreement and stability of the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM): use in children with developmental disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1797; 78: 1309-15.
Mathiowetz V., Volland G., Kashman N., Weber K.Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther1985; 39: 386-91.
25.
Rapin I., Tourk LM, Costa LDEvaluation of the Purdue Pegboard as a screening test for brain damage. Dev Med Child Neurol1966; 8: 45-54.
26.
Singh G., Athreya BH, Fries JF, Goldsmith DPMeasurement of health status in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis . Arthritis Rheum1994; 37: 1761-69.
27.
Aarts PB, Jongerius PH, Geerdink YA, Geurts ACValidity and reliability of the VOAA-DDD to assess spontaneous hand use with a video observation tool in children with spastic unilateral cerebral palsy . BMC Musculoskelet Disord2009; 10: 145-53.
28.
Taylor N., Sand PL, Jebsen RHEvaluation of hand function in children. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1973; 54: 129-35.
29.
Charles JR, Wolf SL, Schneider JA, Gordon AMEfficacy of a child-friendly form of constraint-induced movement therapy in hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a randomized control trial. Dev Med Child Neurol2006; 48: 635-42.
30.
Gordon AM, Charles J., Wolf SLEfficacy of constraint-induced movement therapy on involved upper-extremity use in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy is not age-dependent. Pediatrics2006; 117: 363-73.
31.
DeMatteo C., Law M., Russell D., Pollock N., Rosenbaum P., Walter S.The reliability and validity of the quality of upper extremity skills test . Phys Occup Ther Pediatr1993; 13: 1-18.
32.
Sorsdahl AB, Moe-Nilssen R., Strand LIObserver reliability of the Gross Motor Performance Measure and the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test, based on video recordings. Dev Med Child Neurol2008; 50: 146-51.
33.
Klingels K. , De Cock P., Desloovere K. et al. Comparison of the Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function and the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test in hemiplegic CP. Dev Med Child Neurol2008; 50: 904-9.
34.
Randall M., Carlin JB, Chondros P., Reddihough D.Reliability of the Melbourne assessment of unilateral upper limb function . Dev Med Child Neurol2001; 43: 761-7.
35.
Cusick A., Vasquez M., Knowles L., Wallen M.Effect of rater training on reliability of Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function scores. Dev Med Child Neurol2005; 47: 39-45.
36.
Bourke-Taylor H.Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function: construct validity and correlation with the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Dev Med Child Neurol2003; 45: 92-6.
37.
Krumlinde-sundholm L., Holmefur M., Kottorp A., Eliasson ACThe Assisting Hand Assessment: current evidence of validity, reliability, and responsiveness to change. Dev Med Child Neurol2007; 49: 259-64.
38.
Wang HH, Liao HF, Hsieh CLReliability, sensitivity to change, and responsiveness of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales - second edition for children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther2006; 86: 1351-9.
39.
Iyer LV, Haley SM, Watkins MP, Dumas HMEstablishing minimal clinically important differences for scores on the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory for inpatient rehabilitation. Phys Ther2003; 83: 888-98.
40.
Velozo C., Kielhofner G., Lai J.The use of Rasch Analysis to produce scale-free measurement of functional ability. Am J Occup Ther1998; 53: 83-90.
41.
Damiano DL, Gilgannon MD, Abel MFResponsiveness and uniqueness of the pediatric outcomes data collection instrument compared to the gross motor function measure for measuring orthopaedic and neurosurgical outcomes in cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop2005; 25: 641-5.
42.
Fehlings D. , Rang M., Glazier J., Steele C.An evaluation of botulinum-A toxin injections to improve upper extremity function in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy . J Pediatr2000; 137: 331-7.
43.
Wallen MA, O’Flaherty SJ, Waugh MCFunctional outcomes of intramuscular botulinum toxin type A in the upper limbs of children with cerebral palsy: a phase II trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2004; 85: 192-200.
44.
Speth LA, Leffers P., Janssen-Potten YJ, Vles JSBotulinum toxin A and upper limb functional skills in hemiparetic cerebral palsy: a randomized trial in children receiving intensive therapy. Dev Med Child Neurol2005; 47: 468-73.
45.
Satila H., Kotamaki A., Koivikko M., Autti-Ramo I.Upper limb function after botulinum toxin A treatment in cerebral palsy: two years follow-up of six cases. Pediatr Rehabil2006; 9: 247-58.
46.
Lowe K., Novak I., Cusick A.Low-dose/highconcentration localized botulinum toxin A improves upper limb movement and function in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol2006; 48: 170-5.
47.
Willis JK, Morello A., Davie A., Rice JC, Bennett JTForced use treatment of childhood hemiparesis. Pediatrics2002; 110: 94-6.
48.
Eliasson AC , Krumlinde-sundholm L., Shaw K., Wang C.Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy in young children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: an adapted model. Dev Med Child Neurol2005; 47: 266-75.
49.
Wallen M., Ziviani J., Herbert R., Evans R., Novak I.Modified constraint-induced therapy for children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a feasibility study. Dev Neurorehabil2008; 11: 124-33.
50.
Gordon AM, Schneider JA, Chinnan A., Charles JREfficacy of a hand-arm bimanual intensive therapy (HABIT) in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a randomized control trial. Dev Med Child Neurol2007; 49: 830-8.
51.
van der Lee JH, Beckerman H., Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LMThe responsiveness of the Action Research Arm test and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale in chronic stroke patients. J Rehabil Med2001; 33: 110-13.
52.
Harvey A., Robin J., Graham HK, Baker R.A systematic review of measures of activity limitation for children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol2008; 50: 190-8.
53.
Sakzewski L., Boyd R., Ziviani J.Clinimetric properties of participation measures for 5- to 13-year-old children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol2007; 49: 232-40.
54.
Buffart LM, Roebroeck ME, Pesch-Batenburg J., Janssen W., Stam HJAssessment of arm/hand functioning in children with a congenital transverse or longitudinal reduction deficiency of the upper limb. Disabil Rehabil2006; 28: 85-95.
55.
Ashford S., Slade M., Malaprade F., Turner-Stokes L.Evaluation of functional outcome measures for the hemiparetic upper limb: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med2008; 40: 787-95.
