Objective: To determine the efficacy of portable electronic aids such as personal digital assistants (PDAs), pagers or mobile phones for patients with cognitive deficits by means of a systematic review. The usability of these aids is also briefly discussed.
Data sources: PubMed, CINAHL, PsychINFO, EMBASE and MEDLINE were searched up to February 2009. The references of identified and relevant articles were scanned to find additional relevant titles.
Review methods: Papers referring to ‘electronic aids’, ‘cognition’ and ‘brain injury’ were included. The population had to be adult and have cognitive impairments as a result of acquired brain injury. Outcome measures were change in cognitive or occupational performance or the level of participation in daily life. The criteria of Cicerone et al. were used to evaluate the quality of the retrieved studies.
Results: Twenty-eight papers presenting 25 studies were reviewed. The total number of participants was 423. Most identified papers described case reports or non-randomized clinical trials. Only one randomized controlled trial was identified, in which the NeuroPage proved effective in supporting prospective memory. Other kinds of assistive technology such as PDAs and voice recorders showed positive results in supporting retrospective and prospective memory.
Conclusion: The efficacy of assistive technology in general is not yet sufficiently studied in randomized controlled trials, although promising results has been reported. Furthermore, several survey studies established that both potential users and clinicians have optimistic expectations about the usability of assistive technology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
van der Naalt J., van Zomeren AH, Sluiter WJ, Minderhoud JMOne year outcome in mild to moderate head injury: the predictive value of acute injury characteristics related to complaints and return to work. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1999; 66: 20713.
2.
Patel M., Coshall C., Rudd AG, Wolfe CDNatural history of cognitive impairment after stroke and factors associated with its recovery. Clin Rehabil2003; 17: 158 66.
3.
Hart T., O’Neil-Pirozzi T., Morita C.Clinician expectations for portable electronic devices as cognitive-behavioural orthoses in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Inj2003; 17: 401 11.
4.
Kapur N., Glisky EL, Wilson B.Technological memory aids for people with memory deficits. Neuropsychol Rehabil2004; 14: 41 60 .
5.
LoPresti EF, Mihailidis A., Kirsch N.Assistive technology for cognitive rehabilitation: State of the art . Neuropsychol Rehabil2004; 14: 5 39.
6.
Cicerone KD, Dahlberg C., Kalmar K. et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: recommendations for clinical practice. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2000; 81: 1596 615.
7.
Rees L., Marshall S., Hartridge C., Mackie D., Weiser M.Cognitive interventions post acquired brain injury. Brain Inj2007; 21: 161 200.
8.
Cicerone KD, Dahlberg C., Malec JF et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2005; 86: 168192.
9.
Carney N., Chesnut RM, Maynard H., Mann NC, Patterson P., Helfand M.Effect of cognitive rehabilitation on outcomes for persons with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. J Head Trauma Rehabil1999; 14: 277 307.
10.
Thone-Otto AIT , Walther K.How to design an electronic memory aid for brain-injured patients: considerations on the basis of a model of prospective memory. Int J Psychol2003; 38: 236 44 .
11.
Kirsch NL, Shenton M., Spirl E. et al. Web-based assistive technology interventions for cognitive impairments after traumatic brain injury: a selective review and two case studies. Rehabil Psychol2004; 49: 200 12 .
12.
Kirsch N., Shenton M., Spirl E., Simpson R., LoPresti E., Schreckenghost D.An assistive-technology intervention for verbose speech after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil2004; 19: 366 77.
13.
Wilson BA, Emslie H., Quirk K., Evans J., Watson P.A randomized control trial to evaluate a paging system for people with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj2005 ; 19: 891 94.
14.
Emslie H., Wilson BA, Quirk K., Evans JJ, Watson P.Using a paging system in the rehabilitation of encephalitic patients . Neuropsychol Rehabil2007; 17: 567 81.
15.
Wilson BA, Emslie HC, Quirk K., Evans JJReducing everyday memory and planning problems by means of a paging system: a randomised control crossover study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2001; 70: 477 82.
16.
Fish J., Manly T., Emslie H., Evans JJ, Wilson BACompensatory strategies for acquired disorders of memory and planning: differential effects of a paging system for patients with brain injury of traumatic versus cerebrovascular aetiology. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2008; 79: 930 35.
17.
Evans JJ, Emslie H., Wilson BAExternal cueing systems in the rehabilitation of executive impairments of action. J Int Neuropsychol Soc1998; 4: 399408.
18.
Fish J., Manly T., Wilson BALong-term compensatory treatment of organizational deficits in a patient with bilateral frontal lobe damage. J Int Neuropsychol Soc2008; 14: 15463.
19.
Wilson BA, Evans JJ, Emslie H., Malinek V.Evaluation of NeuroPage: a new memory aid. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1997; 63: 11315.
20.
Fish J., Evans JJ, Nimmo M. et al. Rehabilitation of executive dysfunction following brain injury: ‘content-free’ cueing improves everyday prospective memory performance . Neuropsychologia2007; 45: 131830.
21.
Yasuda K., Misu T., Beckman B., Watanabe O., Ozawa Y., Nakamura T.Use of an IC recorder as a voice output memory aid for patients with prospective memory impairment. Neuropsychol Rehabil2002 ; 12: 15566.
22.
Kirsch NL, Shenton M., Rowan J.A generic, ‘in-house,’ alphanumeric paging system for prospective activity impairments after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj2004; 18: 725 34.
23.
DePompei R. , Gillette Y., Goetz E., Xenopoulos-Oddsson A., Bryen D., Dowds M.Practical applications for use of PDAs and smartphones with children and adolescents who have traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation2008; 23: 487 99.
24.
Van Hulle A. , Hux K.Improvement patterns among survivors of brain injury: three case examples documenting the effectiveness of memory compensation strategies. Brain Inj2006; 20: 101 109.
25.
Oriani M., Moniz-Cook E., Binetti G. et al. An electronic memory aid to support prospective memory in patients in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease: a pilot study. Aging Ment Health2003; 7: 2227.
26.
Gentry TAP , Wallace J., Kvarfordt C., Lynch KBPersonal digital assistants as cognitive aids for individuals with severe traumatic brain injury: a community-based trial. Brain Inj2008; 22: 19 24 .
27.
Davies DK, Stock SE, Wehmeyer MLEnhancing independent time-management skills of individuals with mental retardation using a Palmtop personal computer. Ment Retard2002; 40: 35865.
28.
Stapleton S. , Adams M., Atterton L.A mobile phone as a memory aid for individuals with traumatic brain injury: a preliminary investigation . Brain Inj2007; 21: 401 11 .
29.
van den Broek MD, Downes J., Johnson Z., Dayus B., Hilton N.Evaluation of an electronic memory aid in the neuropsychological rehabilitation of prospective memory deficits. Brain Inj2000; 14: 45562.
30.
Gentry T.PDAs as cognitive aids for people with multiple sclerosis. Am J Occup Ther2008; 62: 1827.
31.
Gorman P., Dayle R., Hood CA, Rumrell L.Effectiveness of the ISAAC cognitive prosthetic system for improving rehabilitation outcomes with neurofunctional impairment. NeuroRehabilitation2003; 18: 5767.
32.
Sohlberg MM , Fickas S., Hung PF, Fortier A.A comparison of four prompt modes for route finding for community travellers with severe cognitive impairments. Brain Inj2007; 21: 5318.
33.
Hart T., Hawkey K., Whyte J.Use of a portable voice organizer to remember therapy goals in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: a within-subjects trial. J Head Trauma Rehabil2002; 17: 556 70.
34.
Gillette Y. , DePompei R.The potential of electronic organizers as a tool in the cognitive rehabilitation of young people. NeuroRehabilitation2004; 19: 23343.
35.
Hart T., Buchhofer R., Vaccaro M.Portable electronic devices as memory and organizational aids after traumatic brain injury: a consumer survey study. J Head Trauma Rehabil2004; 19: 35165.
36.
Kim HJ, Burke DT, Dowds MM Jr., Boone KA, Park GJElectronic memory aids for outpatient brain injury: follow-up findings . Brain Inj2000; 14: 187 96 .
37.
O’Neil-Pirozzi TM, Kendrick H., Goldstein R., Glenn M.Clinician influences on use of portable electronic memory devices in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation . Brain Inj2004; 18: 179 89 .
38.
Gillette Y. , DePompei R.The potential of electronic organizers as a tool in the cognitive rehabilitation of young people. NeuroRehabilitation2004; 19: 23343.
39.
Scherer MJAssessing the benefits of using assistive technologies and other supports for thinking, remembering and learning. Disabil Rehabil2005; 27: 7319.
40.
Gamble M., Dowler D., Orslene L.Assistive technology: choosing the right tool for the right job. J Vocation Rehabil2006; 24: 73 80 .
41.
Evans JJ, Wilson BA, Needham P., Brentnall S.Who makes good use of memory aids? Results of a survey of people with acquired brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc2003; 9: 925 35.
42.
Jacobsson A. , Magnusson B.Handheld computer used as support for people with psychotic diseases in vocational rehabilitation. Competence Centre For Schizophrenia Section of Psychosis, Sahlgrenska Psychiatric Department Report 2/2004. 2004: 18.
43.
Gillette Y. , DePompei R.Do PDAs enhance the organization and memory skills of students with cognitive disabilities?Psychol Schools2008; 45: 66577.
44.
Giles GM, Shore M.The effectiveness of an electronic memory aid for a memory-impaired adult of normal intelligence. Am J Occup Ther1989 ; 43: 40911.
45.
Kim HJ, Burke DT, Dowds MM, George J.Utility of a microcomputer as an external memory aid for a memory-impaired head injury patient during in-patient rehabilitation. Brain Inj1999; 13: 14750.
46.
Wade TK, Troy JCMobile phones as a new memory aid: a preliminary investigation using case studies. Brain Inj2001; 15: 30520.
