Effectiveness of an online fatigue self-management programme for people with chronic neurological conditions: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate an online fatigue self-management programme in a sample of adults with chronic neurological conditions.

Design: Randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Online fatigue self-management programme delivered across Australia.

Participants: Ninety-five people with fatigue secondary to multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease or post-polio syndrome.

Interventions: An online fatigue self-management programme, an information-only fatigue self-management programme and a control group.

Main measures: Groups were compared at pre test, post test and at three months on primary outcomes using the Fatigue Impact Scale, Activity Card Sort and Personal Wellbeing Index.

Results: With the exception of the Personal Wellbeing Index at post test (F = 3.519; P =0.034) and the Physical Subscale of the Fatigue Impact Scale at follow-up (F = 3.473; P =0.035) there were no significant differences between the three groups on primary outcomes. Post-hoc testing showed the differences to be between the information-only and control groups (P = 0.036 and P = 0.030 respectively). Improvement in the information-only group was unexpected but appears to be similar to results of other online interventions. The fatigue self-management and information-only groups performed better than the control on some secondary outcome measures. Low power in the analysis may have contributed to the findings. Repeated-measures ANCOVA showed that the fatigue self-management and the information-only groups improved over time on the Fatigue Impact Scale and the Activity Card Sort (P<0.05). The control group showed no improvements over time.

Keywords

Conclusions: Although the fatigue self-management group improved over time results did not demonstrate additional benefit in most outcome measures when compared with the control group.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Fisk JD , Pontefract A. , Ritvo PG , Archibald CJ , Murray TJ The impact of fatigue on patients with multiple sclerosis. Can J Neurol Sci 1994; 21: 9-14.

Berlly MH , Strauser WW , Hall KM Fatigue in postpolio syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991; 72: 115-18.

Friedman JH , Friedman HH Fatigue in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 1993; 43: 2016-18.

Lewis G. , Wessely S. The epidemiology of fatigue: more questions than answers. J Epidemiol Community Health 1992; 46: 92-97.

Dittner A. , Wessely S. , Brown R. The assessment of fatigue: A practical guide for clinicians and researchers . J Psychosom Res 2004; 56: 157-70.

Packer TL , Martins I. , Krefting L. , Brouwer B. Activity and post-polio fatigue. Orthopedics 1991; 14: 1223-26.

Krupp LB , Pollina DA Mechanisms and management of fatigue in progressive neurological disorders . Curr Opin Neurol 1996; 9: 456-60.

Bruno RL Word finding difficulty as a post-polio sequelae. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 79: 343-48.

Isella V. , Melzi P. , Grimaldi M. et al. Clinical, neuropsychological, and morphometric correlates of apathy in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2002 ; 17: 366-71.

10.

Benedict RH , Wahlig E. , Bakshi R. et al. Predicting quality of life in multiple sclerosis: accounting for physical disability, fatigue, cognition, mood disorder, personality, and behaviour change. J Neurol Sci 2005; 231: 29-34.

11.

Bennett SJ , Perkins SM , Lane KA , Deer M. , Brater DC , Murray MD Social support and health-related quality of life in chronic heart failure patients. Qual Life Res 2001; 10: 671-82.

12.

Black D. , Grant C. , Lapsley H. , Rawson G. The services and social needs of people with multiple sclerosis in New South Wales, Australia. J Rehabil 1994; 60: 6-10.

13.

Packer T. , Foster D. , Brouwer B. Fatigue and activity patterns of people with chronic fatigue syndrome. Occup J Res 1997; 17: 186-99.

14.

Shulman L. , Taback R. , Bean J. , Weiner W. Comorbidity of the nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2001; 16: 507-10.

15.

Brañas P. , Jordan R. , Fry-Smith A. , Burls A. , Hyde C. Treatments for fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a rapid and systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2000; 4: 1-61.

16.

Packer TL , Brink N. , Sauriol A. Managing fatigue: a six-week course for energy conservation. Tucson, AZ: Therapy Skill Builders, 1995.

17.

Sauter C. , Zebenholzer K. , Hisakawa J. , Zeitlhofer J. , Vass K. A longitudinal study on effects of a six-week course for energy conservation for multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler 2008; 14: 500-505.

18.

Mathiowetz V. , Finlayson ML , Matuska KM , Chen HY , Luo P. Randomized controlled trial of an energy conservation course for persons with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2005; 11: 592-601.

19.

Ghahari S. , Packer T. , Passmore A. Development, standardization and pilot testing of an online fatigue self-management program. Disabil Rehabil 2009; 31: 1762-72.

20.

Krupp LB , LaRocca NG , Muir-Nash J. , Steinberg AD The Fatigue Severity Scale. Application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch Neurol 1989; 46: 1121-23.

21.

Katzman R. , Brown T. , Fuld P. , Peck A. , Schechter R. , Schimmel H. Validation of a short Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test of cognitive impairment . Am J Psychiatry 1983; 140: 734-39.

22.

Cummins RA , Eckersley R. , Pallant J. , van Vugt J. , Misajon R. Developing a national index of subjective well-being: The Australian unity well-being index. Soc Indic Res 2003; 64: 159-90.

23.

Freeman JA , Hobart JC , Langdon DW , Thompson AJ Clinical appropriateness: a key factor in outcome measure selection: The 36 item short form health survey in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 68: 150-56.

24.

Doney RM , Packer TL Measuring changes in activity participation of older Australians: validation of the Activity Card Sort - Australia. Aust J Ageing 2008; 27: 33-37.

25.

Girdler SJ , Boldy D. , Dhaliwal SS , Crowley M. , Packer TL Vision self-management for older adults: a randomised controlled trial. Brit J Ophthalmol 2010; 94: 223-28.

26.

Brown TA , Chorpita BF , Korotitsch W. , Barlow DH Psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) in clinical samples. Behav Res Ther 1997; 35: 79-89.

27.

Koenig H. , Westlund R. , George L. , Hughes D. , Blazer D. , Hybels C. Abbreviating the Duke Social Support Index for use in chronically ill elderly individuals. Psychosomatics 1993; 34: 61-69.

28.

Goodger B. , Byles J. , Higganbotham N. , Mishra G. Assessment of a short scale to measure social support among older people. Aust N Z J Publ Health 1999; 23: 260-65.

29.

Schwarzer R. Measurement of perceived self-efficacy: psychometric scale for cross-cultural research. Berlin: Free University of Berlin Press, 1993.

30.

Barlow JH , Williams B. , Wright C. The Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale in people with arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 1996; 9: 189-96.

31.

Warsi A. , Wang PS , LaValley MP , Avorn J. , Solomon DH Self-management education programs in chronic disease: a systematic review and methodological critique of the literature. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164: 1641-49.

32.

Nguyen HQ , Carrieri-Kohlman V. , Rankin SH , Slaughter R. , Stulbarg MS Internet-based patient education and support interventions: a review of evaluation studies and directions for future research. Comput Biol Med 2004; 34: 95-112.

33.

Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural science. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1988.

34.

Australian Bureau of Statistics. Household use of information technology. 2002-2003.

35.

Packer TL , Boshoff K. , Desleigh D. Development of the Activity Card Sort - Australia. Aust Occup Ther J 2007; 54: 1-8.