Objective: To identify subjective importance, attainability and success of life goals and their predictive value for subjective well-being in patients with acquired brain injury.
Design: Cross-sectional, descriptive.
Setting: Two inpatient neurological rehabilitation centres.
Participants: Patients with non-progressive neurological disorders. Interventions: Survey using questionnaires.
Measures: Life goal characteristics were assessed using a life goal questionnaire (GOALS). Subjective well-being (composite score) was measured using the Center of the Epidemic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) and the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS).
Results: Fifty-nine patients participated in the study. The most important life goals are intimacy (4.59/5), achievement (3.96/5) and altruism (3.89/5). The intimacy goals are considered most attainable (4.19/5) and patients feel most successful in this domain (3.98/5). Two important predictions of the personal goal model of subjective well-being could be confirmed. First, goal attainability moderates the relation between goal importance and goal success. Second, the influence of goal importance on subjective well-being is mediated by experienced success. The most powerful predictors for subjective well-being are success in the achievement domain (β = 0.404) and discrepancy between importance and success in the intimacy domain (β = —0.276).
Conclusions: The subjective well-being of neurological patients depends not only on the appraised importance of life goals but also on their attainability and success.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bühler C., Massarik F.The course of human life. New York: Springer, 1968.
2.
Klinger E.Meaning and void: inner experience and incentives in people’s lives . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1977.
3.
Grawe K.Neuropsychotherapy. How the neurosciences inform effective psychotherapy. London: Routledge, 2007.
4.
Emmons RAThe psychology of ultimate concerns: motivation and spirituality in personality . New York: Guilford Press, 1999.
5.
Austin JT, Vancouver JBGoal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content. Psychol Bull1996; 120: 338-75.
6.
Nair K.Life goals: the concept and its relevance to rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil2003; 17: 192-202.
7.
Michalak J., Holtforth MGWhere do we go from here? The goal perspective in psychotherapy. Clin Psychol Sci Pr2006; 13: 346-65.
8.
Ryan RM, Sheldon KM, Kasser T., Deci ELAll goals are not created equal: an organismic perspective on the nature of goals and their regulation. In Gollwitzer PM, Bargh JA. eds. The psychology of action: linking cognition and motivation to behavior. New York: Guilford Press, 1996, 7-26.
9.
Emmons RA, Kaiser HAGoal orientation and emotional well-being: linking goals and affect through the self. In: Martin LL, Tesser A. eds. Conference on striving and feeling - interactions among goals, affect, and self-regulations, Jan 21-23 . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc, publ1996; 79-98.
10.
Elliot AJ, Sheldon KM, Church M.Avoidance personal goals and subjective well-being. Pers Soc Psychol B1997; 23: 915-27.
11.
Brunstein JC, Schultheiß O., Maier GWThe pursuit of personal goals: a motivational approach to well-being and life-adjustment . In Brandtstädter J, Lerner RM. eds. Action and self-development: theory and research through the life span. London: SAGE, 1999, 169-96.
12.
Sheldon KMThe self-concordance model of healthy goal striving: when personal goals correctly represent the person. In Schmuck P, Sheldon KM. eds. Life goals and well-being: towards a positive psychology of human striving. Seattle : Hogrefe, 2001, 18-36.
13.
Sheldon KM, Kasser T.Coherence and congruence: Two aspects of personality integration. J Pers Soc Psychol1995; 68: 531-43.
14.
Riediger M. , Freund AMInterference and facilitation among personal goals: differential associations with subjective well-being and persistent goal pursuit. Pers Soc Psychol B2004; 30: 1511-23.
Nair K., Wade D.Changes in life goals of people with neurological disabilities. Clin Rehabil2003; 17: 797-803.
18.
Pöhlmann K.Persönliche Ziele: Ein neuer Ansatz zur Erfassung von Therapiezielen. [Personal goals: A new approach for assessing therapy goals]. Praxis Klin Verhaltensmed Rehabil1999; 45: 14-20.
19.
Scobbie L., Wyke S., Dixon D.Identifying and appling psychological theory to setting and achieving rehabilitation goals identifying and applying psychological theory to setting and achieving rehabilitation goals. Clin Rehabil2009; 23: 321-33.
20.
Playford ED , Siegert R., Levack W., Freeman J.Areas of consensus and controversy about goal-setting in rehabilitation: a conference report. Clin Rehabil2009; 23: 334-44.
21.
Bandura A.Self-efficacy - the exercise of control. New York: WH Freeman, 1997.
22.
Locke EA, Latham GPBuilding a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: a 35-year odyssey. Am Psychol2002; 57: 705-17.
23.
Barnes MP, Ward ABTextbook of rehabilitation medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
24.
Nair K., Wade D.Life goals of people with disabilities due to neurological disorders. Clin Rehabil2003; 17: 521-27.
25.
Boerner K., Cimarolli VROptimizing rehabilitation for adults with visual impairment: attention to life goals and their links to well-being. Clin Rehabil2005; 19: 790-98.
26.
McNamara P., Durso R., Harris E.Life goals of patients with Parkinson’s disease: a pilot study on correlations with mood and cognitive functions. Clin Rehabil2006; 20: 818-26.
27.
Sheldon KM, Elliot AJGoal striving, need-satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: the self-concordance model. J Pers Soc Psychol1999; 76: 482-97.
28.
Baron RM, Kenny DAThe moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological-research - conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol1986; 51: 1173-82.
29.
Brunstein JC, Maier GW, Schultheiß OCMotivation und Persönlichkeit: von der Analyse von Teilsystemen zur Analyse ihrer Interaktion. In Jerusalem M, Pekrun R. eds. Emotion, Motivation und Leistung . Göttingen: Hogrefe, 1999, 147-67.
30.
Brandtstädter J.Action perspectives on human development. In Damon W, Lerner RM. eds. Handbook of child psychology, Volume 1 Theoretical models of human development, fifth edition. New York: Wiley, 1998, 807-63.
31.
Böcker M., Eberle N., Wirtz M., Hesse M., Gauggel S.Entwicklung und erste Validierung der Aachener Funktionsfähigkeits-Itembank . In Bund DR. ed. 18. Rehabilitationswissenschaftliches Kolloquium Innovation in der Rehabilitation - Kommunikation und Vernetzung. Berlin: DRV, 2009.
32.
Haley SM, Coster WJ, Andres PL et al. Activity outcome measurement for postacute care. Med Care2004; 42(suppl): 149-61.
33.
Pöhlmann K., Brunstein JCGOALS: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung von Lebenszielen . Diagnostica1997; 43: 63-79.
34.
Beetz AMLove, violance, and sexuality in relationships between humans and animals . Aachen: Shaker, 2002.
35.
Radloff LSThe CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psych Meas1977; 1: 385-401.
36.
Hautzinger M., Bailer M.Allgemeine Depressionsskala (ADS). Deutsche Form der Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale. Weinheim: Beltz, 1993.
37.
Bay E., Hagerty BM, Williams RADepressive symptomatology after mild-to-moderate traumatic brain injury: a comparison of three measures. Arch Psychiat Nurs2007; 21: 2-11.
38.
Diener E., Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S.The Satisfaction with Life Scale. J Pers Assess1985; 49: 71-75.
39.
Crawford JR , Henry JDThe positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol2004; 43: 245-65.
40.
Sheldon KM, Krieger LSUnderstanding the negative effects of legal education on law students: a longitudinal test of self-determination theory. Pers Soc Psychol B2007; 33: 883-97.
41.
Sheldon KM, Kasser T.Pursuing personal goals: skills enable progress, but not all progress is beneficial . Pers Soc Psychol Bull1998; 24: 1319-31.
Sobel MEAsymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In Leinhart S. ed. Sociological methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1982, 290-312.
44.
Preacher KJ , Hayes AFSPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav Res Meth Ins C2004; 36: 717-31.
45.
Aiken LS, West SGMultiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: CA: SAGE, 1991.
46.
Pöhlmann K., Brunstein JC, Koch R., Brähler E., Joraschky P.Der Lebenszielfragebogen GOALS: Befunde zur inneren und externen Validität auf der Basis einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsstichprobe und einer klinischen Stichprobe. [The Life goals questionnaire GOALS: Data on reliability and validity from a population-based survey and a clinical sample] . Zeitschrift für Medizinische Psychologie (in press).
47.
Abele AE, Stief M., Krüsken J.Personal goals of mathematicians at first job entry. German J Educ Psychol2002; 16: 193-205.
