Meeting stroke survivors’ perceived needs: a qualitative study of a community-based exercise and education scheme

Abstract

Objective: A qualitative study using a phenomenological approach, to explore stroke survivors’ needs and their perceptions of whether a community stroke scheme met these needs.

Methods: Semi-structured in-depth interviews of 12 stroke survivors, purposively selected from participants attending a new community stroke scheme. Interpretative phenomenological analysis of interviews by two researchers independently.

Results: Participants attending the community stroke scheme sought to reconstruct their lives in the aftermath of their stroke. To enable this they needed internal resources of confidence and sense of purpose to ‘create their social self’, and external resources of ‘responsive services’ and an ‘informal support network’, to provide direction and encouragement. Participants felt the community stroke scheme met some of these needs through exercise, goal setting and peer group interaction, which included social support and knowledge acquisition.

Conclusion: Stroke survivors need a variety of internal and external resources so that they can rebuild their lives positively post stroke. A stroke-specific community scheme, based on exercise, life-centred goal setting, peer support and knowledge acquisition, is an external resource that can help with meeting some of the stroke survivor’s needs.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Murray CD , Harrison B. The meaning and experience of being a stroke survivor: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 808-16.

Teasell RW , Jutai JW , Bhogal SK , Foley NC Research gaps in stroke rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil 2003; 10: 59 70.

Mayo NE , Wood-Dauphinee S. , Ahmed S. et al. Disablement following stroke. Disabil Rehabil 1999; 21: 258 68.

Kirkevold M. The unfolding illness trajectory of stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 887 98.

Dowswell G. , Lawler J. , Dowswell T. , Young J. , Forster A. Hearn J Investigating recovery from stroke; a qualitative study. J Clin Nurs 2000; 9: 507 15.

Alaszewski A. , Alaszewski H. , Potter J. Risk, uncertainty and life threatening trauma: analysing stroke survivor’s accounts of life after stroke forum. Qual Soc Res 2006; 7: Art. 18.

Parker CJ , Gladman JR , Drummond AE The role of leisure in stroke rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 1997; 19: 1-5.

Han B. , Haley WE Family caregiving for patients with stroke: review and analysis. Stroke 1999; 30: 1478 85.

Department of Health. National stroke strategy . London: Crown Copyright, 2007.

10.

Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National clinical guidelines for stroke, second edition. London , Royal College of Physicians, 2004 .

11.

Drummond AE , Walker MF A randomized controlled trial of leisure rehabilitation after stroke. Clin Rehabil 1995; 9: 283 90.

12.

Burton CR Living with stroke: a phenomenological study. J Adv Nurs 2000; 3: 339 52.

13.

Ellis Hill C. , Payne S. , Ward C. Self body spilt: issues of identity in physical recovery following stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2000; 22: 725 33.

14.

Egbert N. , Koch L. , Coeling H. , Ayres D. The role of social support in the family and community integration of right-hemisphere stroke survivors. Health Communication 2006 ; 20: 45 55.

15.

Pound P. , Gompertz P. , Ebrahim S. Social and practical strategies described by people living at home with stroke . Health Soc Care Community 1999; 7: 120 28.

16.

National Audit Office. Department of Health. Reducing brain damage: faster access to better stroke care. London, Stationery Office, 2005.

17.

Harrington R. , Taylor GT , Hollinghurst S. , Reed M. , Kay H. , Wood V. A community-based exercise and education scheme for stroke survivors: a randomized controlled trial and economic evaluation . Clin Rehabil.

18.

Smith JA , Jarman M , Osborn M. Doing interpretive phenomenological analysis. In Murray M , Chamberlain K. eds. Qualitative health psychology: theories and methods. London, Sage Publications, 1999.

19.

Patton MQ Qualitative research and evaluation methods, third edition. London, Sage Publications, 2002.

20.

Carod-Artol J. , Egido JA et al. Quality of life among stroke survivors evaluated 1 year after stroke. Stroke 2000 ; 31: 2995 3000.

21.

Collin C. , Wade DT , Davies S. , Home V. The Barthel ADL index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud 1988; 10: 61 63.

22.

Enderby PM , Wood VA , Wade DT , Langton Hewer R. The Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test: a short, simple test for aphasia appropriate for non-specialists. Int Rehabil Med 1987; 8: 166 70.

23.

Mays N , Pope C. eds. Qualitative research in health care. London, BMJ Books, 1996.

24.

Amarshi F. , Artero L. , Reid D. Exploring social and leisure participation among stroke survivors: part 1 and 2. Int J Ther Rehabil 2006; 13: 166 70, and 13: 199 207.

25.

Kessler D. , Dubouloz CJ , Urbanowski R. , Egan M. Meaning perspective transformation following stroke: the process of change . Disabil Rehabil 2009; 31: 1056 65.

26.

Roman MW Lessons learned from a school for stroke recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil 2008; 15: 59 71.

27.

Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Hum Relat 1954: 114-40.

28.

Glanz K. , Marger SM , Meehan EF Evaluation of a peer educator stroke education program for the elderly. Health Educ Res 1986; 1: 121 30.

29.

Department of Health. The expert patient: a new approach to chronic disease management for the 21st century. London, Crown Copyright , 2001.