Filling up the hours: how do stroke patients on a rehabilitation nursing home spend the day?

Abstract

Objective: To describe the time use of stroke patients on rehabilitation units of a nursing home focusing on the time spent on therapeutic activities, non-therapeutic activities, interactions and the location wherein these took place.

Design: A descriptive study.

Setting: Rehabilitation units of a nursing home.

Subjects: Seventeen chronic stroke patients, including 9 men, 8 women, with a mean age of 77 years (SD ± 7.6 years).

Main measures: Daily activities of patients were measured using Behavioural Mapping, including therapeutic activities, non-therapeutic activities, interactions and their location. Functional status was measured with the Barthel Index.

Results. Of the patients 15 (88%) were partly/fully paralysed, with a mean Barthel Index score of 9.4 (SD ± 4.3). The patients spent 20% of the day on therapeutic activities, whereas 80% of the day was spent on non-therapeutic activities; 9% on therapeutic activities with the nurse. For 60% of the day patients were alone and not interacting with others.

Conclusions. Stroke patients spend only short periods of time during the day on therapeutic activities. For the largest part of the day, the patient is alone and passive. A challenge for nurses is how to activate patients and engage them in purposeful task-oriented training in daily activities.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

van Peppen RP , Kwakkel G. , Wood-Dauphinee S. , Hendriks HJ , van der Wees PJ , Dekker J.

The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what’s the evidence?

Clin Rehabil 2004; 18: 833-62.

Dobkin BH Strategies for stroke rehabilitation. The Lancet Neurology 2004; 3: 528-36.

Page SJ , Gater DR , Bach-y-Rita P. Reconsidering the Motor Recovery Plateau in Stroke Rehabilitation . Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1377-81.

Giesen AGM , Franke CL , Wiersma TJ et al. Landelijke Transmurale Afspraak CVA 47. Huisartsgeneeskunde Wet 2004; 47: 521-26.

Exel NJA , Koopmanschap MA , Scholte op , Reimer W. , Niessen LW , Huijsman R. Cost-effectiveness of integrated stroke services. QJM 2005; 98: 415-25.

Gaugler JE , Duval S. , Anderson KA , Kane RL Predicting nursing home admission in the US: a meta analysis. BMC Geriatr 2007; 13: 1-14.

de Weerdt W. , Selz B. , Nuyens G. et al. Time use of stroke patients in an intensive rehabilitation unit: a comparison between a Belgian and a Swiss setting. Disabil Rehabil 2000; 22: 181-86.

de Wit L. , Putman K. , Dejaeger E. et al. Use of time by stroke patients. A comparison of four European revalidation centers. Stroke 2005; 36: 1977-83.

Miller RH , Keith RA Behavioural mapping in a rehabilitation hospital. Rehabil Psychol 1973; 20: 148-55.

10.

Keith RA , Cowell KS Time use of stroke patients in three rehabilitation hospitals. Soc Sci Med 1987; 24: 529-33.

11.

Lincoln NB , Gamlen R. , Thomason H. Behavioural mapping of patients on a stroke unit. Int Disabil Stud 1989; 11: 149-54.

12.

Tinson DJ How stroke patients spent their days. An observational study of the treatment regime offered to patients in hospital with movements disorders following stroke. Int Disabil Stud 1989; 11: 45-49.

13.

Lincoln NB , Willis D. , Philips SA , Juby LC , Berman P. Comparison of rehabilitation practice on hospitals wards for stroke patients . Stroke 1996; 27: 18-23.

14.

Bernhardt J. , Dewey H. , Thrift A. , Donnan G. Inactive and alone: physical activity within the first 14 days of acute stroke unit care . Stroke 2004; 34: 1005-1009.

15.

WHO Special Report. Stroke - 1989: Recommendations on stroke prevention, diagnosis and therapy. Stroke 1989; 20: 1407-31.

16.

Wolfe CD , Taub NA , Woodrow EJ , Burney PG Assessment of scales of disability and handicap for stroke patients . Stroke 1991; 22: 1242-44.

17.

Langhorne P. , Stoot DJ , Robertson L. et al. Medical complications after stroke: a multicenter study. Stroke 2000; 31: 1223-29.

18.

Kwakkel G. Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: issues for consideration . Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28: 823-30.

19.

Strasser DC , Falconer JA , Herrin JS , Bowen SE , Stevens AB , Uomoto J. Team functioning and patient outcomes in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005 ; 86: 403-409.

20.

Rensink M. , Schuurmans M. , Lindeman E. , Hafsteindóttir T. Task-oriented training in rehabilitation after stroke: systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2009; 65: 737-54.

21.

Dean CM , Richards CL , Malouin F. Task-related circuit training improves performance of locomotor tasks in chronic stroke: a randomised controlled pilot trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: 409-17.

22.

Salbach NM , Mayo NE , Wood-Dauphinee S. , Hanley JA , Richards CL , Cote R. A task-oriented intervention enhances walking-distance and speed in the first year post-stroke: a randomised controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004; 53: 576-82.

23.

Blennerhasset J. , Dite W. Additional task-related practice improves mobility and upper limb function early after stroke: a randomised control trial. Aust J Physiother 2004; 50: 219-24.

24.

Lin KC , Wu CY , Lee CY , Liu JS Effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on reach-to-grasp movements and functional performance after chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil 2007; 21: 1075-86.

25.

Maeshima S. , Ueyoshi A. , Osawa A. et al. Mobility and muscle strength contralateral to hemiplegia from stroke. Benefit from self-training with family support . Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 82: 456-62.

26.

Kalra L. , Evans A. , Perez I. et al. Training carers of stroke patients: randomised control trial. BMJ 2004; 328: 1-5.

27.

Hafsteinsdóttir TB , Schuurmans MM Verpleegkundige Revalidatierichtlijn Beroerte . Maarsen, Elsevier Gezondheidszorg , 2009.