A computerized visual perception rehabilitation programme with interactive computer interface using motion tracking technology — a randomized controlled,single-blinded,pilot clinical trial study

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of a computerized visual perception rehabilitation programme using motion tracking technology for visual perception impairment.

Design: Randomized controlled, single-blinded, pilot clinical trial study.

Setting: Inpatient rehabilitation hospital.

Subjects: Sixteen left hemiplegic patients with visual perceptional impairment.

Intervention: Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either (1) participation in a computerized visual perception rehabilitation programme with an interactive patient—computer interface applying motion tracking technology based on the CAMSHIFT algorithm or (2) use of the PSS CogRehab program for three sessions per week, 30 minutes per session for four weeks. There were eight patients in each group.

Main measures: Mini-Mental Status Examination, Motor-free Visual Perception Test and Modified Barthel Index were assessed at the beginning and end of the training. A survey was conducted to evaluate the degree of patients' interest using an interest scale.

Results: After training, the mean (SD) Motor-free Visual Perception Test score increased significantly in both experimental group (from 65.8 (19.5) to 77.8 (28.7)) and control group (from 68.3 (11.4) to 74.1 (14.8)) (P<0.01). Modified Barthel Index score increased significantly in both groups, with the experimental group recording a higher increase. Mean (SD) interest scale score was greater in the experimental group (2.2 (0.8)) than in the control group (1.3 (0.7)) (P<0.01).

Conclusions: A computerized visual perception rehabilitation programme with interactive computer interface using motion tracking technology could be considered as a treatment option for stroke patients with visual perception impairment.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kerkhoff G. Rehabilitation of visuospatial cognition and visual exploration in neglect: a cross-over study. Restor Neurol Neurosci 1998; 12: 27-40.

Cicerone KD , Dahlberg C. , Malec JF et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 1681-92.

Cicerone KD , Dahlberg C. , Kalmar K. et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: recommendations for clinical practice. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000 ; 81: 1596-615.

Kasten E. , Wuest S. , Behrens-Famann W. , Sabel BA Computer-based training for the treatment of partial blindness. Nat Med 1998; 4: 1083-87.

Chen SH , Thomas JD , Glueckauf RL , Bracy OL The effectiveness of computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation for persons with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 1997 ; 11: 197-209.

Comanciu D. , Meer P. Mean shift analysis and application. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Vision, Kerkyra, Greece, 1999; 1197-203.

Bradski GR Computer vision face tracking for use in a perceptual user interface. Intel Technol J 1998; 2: 1-15.

Elgamal S. , McKinnon MC , Ramakrishnan K. , Joffe RT , MacQueen G. Successful computer-assisted cognitive remediation therapy in patients with unipolar depression: a proof of principle study. Psychol Med 2007; 37: 1229-38.

Shin SH , Ko MH , Kim YH Effect of computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation program for patients with brain injury. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 2002; 26: 1-8.

10.

Tombaugh TN , McIntyre NJ The mini-mental state examination: a comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992; 40: 922-35.

11.

Calarusso RP , Hammill DD Motor-Free Visual Perception Test-3. Academic Therapy Publications, 2003.

12.

Jung HY , Park BK , Shin HS et al. Development of the Korean version of Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI): Multi-center Study for Subjects with Stroke. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 2007; 31: 283-97.

13.

Hofmann M. , Hock C. , Kühler A. , Müller-Spahn F. Interactive computer-based cognitive training in patients with Alzheimer's disease. J Psychiatr Res 1996; 30: 493-501.

14.

Rubio KB , Van Deusen J. Relation of perceptual and body image dysfunction to activities of daily living of persons after stroke. Am J Occup Ther 1995 ; 49: 551-59.

15.

Titus MN , Gall NG , Yerxa EJ , Roberson TA , Mack W. Correlation of perceptual performance and activities of daily living in stroke patients. Am J Occup Ther 1991; 45: 410-18.

16.

Glisky EL , Schacter DL , Tulving E. Computer learning by memory-impaired patients: Acquisition and retention of complex knowledge. Neuropsychologia 1986; 24: 313-28.

17.

Cipriani G. , Bianchetti A. , Trabucchi M. Outcomes of a computer-based cognitive rehabilitation program on Alzheimer's disease patients compared with those on patients affected by mild cognitive impairment. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2006; 43: 327-35.

18.

Webster JS , McFarland PT , Rapport JL , Morrill B. , Roades LA , Abadee PS Computer-assisted training for improving wheelchair mobility in unilateral neglect patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001 ; 82: 769-75.

19.

Tegner R. , Levander M. The influence of stimulus properties on visual neglect. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1991; 54: 882-87.

20.

Kim K. , Kim J. , Ku J. et al. A virtual reality assessment and training system for unilateral neglect. Cyberpsychol Behav 2004; 7: 742-49.

21.

Baheux K. , Yoshizawa M. , Tanaka A. , Seki K. , Handa Y. Diagnosis and rehabilitation of hemispatial neglect patients with virtual reality technology. Technol Health Care 2005 ; 13: 245-60.

22.

Rizzo AA Virtual reality and disability: emergence and challenge. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 567-69.

23.

Rizzo AA , Buckwalter JG , Neumann U. Virtual reality and cognitive rehabilitation: a brief review of the future . J Head Trauma Rehabil 1997; 12: 1-15.

24.

Beis JM , André JM , Barre A. , Paysant J. Mirror images and unilateral spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 2001; 39: 1444-50.