Objective: To assess the possible memory advantages of the subject-performed task (SPT) and experimenter-performed task (EPT) encoding method in rehabilitation settings.
Design: Controlled quasi-experimental trial.
Setting: University research laboratory and community setting.
Subjects: Eighteen stroke survivors and 18 age-, education- and gender-matched controls.
Intervention: Participants were instructed to study three lists of 20 action phrases (such as 'ring the bell') by either reading, performing or observing others perform the tasks for later memory assessment.
Main measure: After the phrases had been studied, verbal and written memory tests were implemented and responses were recorded.
Results: The memory performance of stroke survivors and control groups was significantly better under the SPT method (mean (SD) 7.95 (2.7)) and EPT method (mean (SD) 7.95 (2.5)) relative to the baseline verbal task method (mean (SD) 4.2 (1.9)), (P<0.001 ANOVA). Participants also remembered functional tasks better than clinical tasks (P<0.001 ANOVA).
Conclusion: Encoding by the SPT and EPT methods are significantly more effective than receiving verbal instructions. The SPT and EPT encoding methods show promise and therapists may be able to use them in the clinic to facilitate the memory performance of stroke survivors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Gillespie DC , Bowen A. , Foster JKMemory impairment following right hemisphere stroke: a comparative meta-analytic and narrative review . Clin Neuropsychol2006; 20: 59-75.
2.
Cuesta GMCognitive rehabilitation of memory following stroke: theory, practice, and outcome . Adv Neurol2003; 92: 415-21.
3.
Inzitari D. , Carlo A. , Pracucci G. et al. Incidence and determinants of post stroke dementia as defined by an informal interview method in a hospital-based stroke registry . Stroke1998; 29: 2087-93.
4.
Galski T. , Bruno RL , Zorowitz R. , Walker J.Predicting length of stay, functional outcome, and aftercare in the rehabilitation of stroke patients. The dominant role of higher-order cognition . Stroke1993; 24: 1794-800.
5.
Mokler PJ , Sandstrom R. , Griffin M. , Farris L. , Jones C.Predicting discharge destination for patients with severe motor stroke: important functional tasks . Neurorehabil Neural Repair2000; 14: 181-85.
6.
Cohen RLMemory for action events: the power of enactment . Educ Psychol Rev1989; 1: 57-80.
7.
Engelkamp J.Memory for actions. Psychology Press , 1998.
8.
Zimmer HD , Cohen R. , Guynn MJ , Engelkamp J. , Kormi-Nouri R. , Foley MA. Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic memory?Oxford University Press , 2001.
9.
Cohen RLOn the generality of some memory laws . Scand J Psychol1981; 22: 267-81.
10.
Mimura M. , Komatsu S. , Kato M. , Yashimasu H. , Wakamatsu N. , Kashima H.Memory for subject performed tasks in patients with Korsakoff syndrome . Cortex1998; 34: 297-303.
11.
McAndrews MP , Milner B.The frontal cortex and memory for temporal order . Neuropsychologia1991; 29: 849-59.
12.
Butters MA , Kaszniak AW , Glisky EL , Eslinger PJ , Schacter DLRecency discrimination deficits in frontal lobe patients . Neuropsychology1994; 8: 343-53.
13.
Cohen RL , Bean G.Memory in educable mentally retarded adults: deficit in subject or experimenter?Intelligence1983; 7: 287-98.
14.
Lekeu F. , Van der Linden M. , Moonen G. , Salmon E.Exploring the effects of action familiarity on SPT recall performance in Alzheimer's disease . J Clin Exp Neuropsychol2002; 24: 1057-69.
15.
Karlsson T. , Backman L. , Herlitz A. , Nilsson L. , Winblade B. , Osterlind P.Memory improvement at different stages of Alzheimer's disease . Neuropsychologia1989 ; 27: 737-42.
16.
Dick M. , Kean M.Memory for action events in Alzheimer-type dementia: further evidence of an encoding failure . Brain Cogn1989; 9: 71-87.
17.
Herlitz A. , Backman L.Recall of object names and colors of objects in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease . Arch Gerontol Geriatrics1990; 11: 147-54.
18.
Cohen RLThe effects of encoding variables on the free recall of words and action events . Memory Cogn1983; 6: 575-82.
19.
Cohen RLOn the generality of the laws of memory . In Nilsson L, Archer T eds. Perspectives on learning and memory . Erlbaum, 1985: 247-77.
20.
Engelkamp J. , Zimmer HDMemory for action events: a new field of research . Psychol Res1989; 51: 153-57.
21.
Cohen Jacob.A power primer . Psychol Bull1992; 112: 155-59.
22.
Folstein MF , Folstein SE , McHugh PR'Mini-Mental State.' A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician . J Psychiatr Res1975; 12: 189-98.
23.
Rothi LG , Raymer AM , Ochipa C. , Maher LM , Greenwald ML , Heilman KMFlorida Apraxia Battery, experimental edition. 1992 (unpublished).
24.
Fitch-West J. , Sands ES , Ross-Swain D.Bedside Evaluation Screening Test (BEST-2), second edition. Pro-Ed, 1998.
25.
Larsson C. , Ronnberg J.Memory disorders as a function of traumatic brain injury . Scand J Rehabil Med1987; 19: 99-104.
26.
Trombly CA , Radomski MVOccupational therapy for physical dysfunction, fifth edition . Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002.
27.
Crepeau EB , Cohn ES , Schell BAB.Willard & Spackman's occupational therapy, tenth edition . Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2003.
28.
Rexroth P. , Fisher AG , Merritt BK , Gliner J.ADL differences in individuals with unilateral hemispheric stroke . Can J Occup Ther2005; 72: 212-21.
29.
Bode RK , Heinemann AW , Semik P. , Mallinson T.Relative importance of rehabilitation therapy characteristics on functional outcomes for persons with stroke . Stroke2004 ; 35: 2537-42.
30.
Koriat A. , Pearlman-Avnion S. , Ben-Zur H.The subjective organization of input and output events in memory . Psychol Res1998; 61: 295-307.
31.
Zimmer HD , Helstrup T. , Engelkamp J.Pop-out into memory: a retrieval mechanism that is enhanced with recall of subject-performed tasks . J Exp Psychol Learning Memory Cogn2000; 26: 658-70.
