A prospective,randomized,parallel group,controlled study of the effect of intensity of speech and language therapy on early recovery from poststroke aphasia

Abstract

Objective: To examine whether the amount of speech and language therapy influences the recovery from poststroke aphasia.

Setting: A hospital stroke unit and community.

Design: A prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Intervention: Aphasic stroke patients were randomly allocated to receive 5 hours (intensive therapy group, n=51) or 2 hours (standard therapy group) of speech and language therapy per week for 12 consecutive weeks starting as soon as practicable after the stroke. Another 19 patients were recruited for 2 hours per week of therapy and were treated by National Health Service (NHS) staff (NHS group).

Outcome measure and assessment: The Western Aphasia Battery. Assessments were made blind to randomization at baseline and 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks after the start of therapy. Data were analysed by intention to treat.

Results: The mean (SD) Western Aphasia Battery score at week 12 for the intensive, standard and NHS groups was 70.3 (26.9), 66.2 (26.2) and 58.1 (33.7), respectively. There was no treatment effect of intensive therapy (P > 0.05), but there was a statistically significant difference between the standard study and the NHS groups (P = 0.002 at week 12 and 0.01 at week 24).

Conclusions: Intensive speech and language therapy (as delivered in this study) did not improve the language impairment significantly more than the `standard' therapy which averaged 1.6 hours/week. The improvement in aphasia was least in patients who were in the NHS group. These patients received 0.57 (0.49) hours of therapy per week.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Stegmayer B. , Asplund K. , Wester PO Trends in incidence, case-fatality rate, and severity of stroke in northern Sweden, 1985—1991. Stroke 1994; 25: 1734—45.

Kertesz A. , McCabe P. Recovery patterns and prognosis in aphasia. Brain 1977; 100: 1—18.

Laska AC , Hellbolm A. , Murray V. , Kahan T. , von Arbin M. Aphasia in acute stroke in relation to outcome. J Intern Med 2001; 249: 412—22.

Tenant A. , Geddes Jml , Fear J. , Hillman M. , Chamberlain MA Outcome following stroke. Disabil Rehabil 1997; 19: 278—84.

Robinson RG , Bolduc PL , Price TR 3-year longitudinal study of poststroke mood disorders: diagnosis and outcome at one and two years. Stroke 1987; 18: 837—43.

Astrom M. , Adolfsson R. , Asplund K. Major depression in stroke patients. A 3-year longitudinal study. Stroke 1993; 24: 976—82.

Greener J. , Enderby P. , Whurr R. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke (Cochrane Review) . In The Cochrane Library, Issue 2. Update Software, 2003.

Lincoln NB , Mulley GP , Jones AC , McGuirk E. , Lendrem W. , Mitchell Jra. Effectiveness of speech therapy for aphasic stroke patients: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1984; 1: 1197—200.

Wertz RT , Weiss DG , Aten JL et al. Comparison of clinic, home, and deferred language treatment for aphasia: a veterans administration cooperative study. Arch Neurol 1986; 43: 653—58.

10.

Robey RR

A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes in the treatment of aphasia. J Speech Lang

Hear Res 1998; 41: 172—87.

11.

Xerri C. , Merzenich MM , Peterson BE , Jenkins W. Plasticity of primary somatosensory cortex paralleling skill recovery from stroke in adult monkeys. J Neurophysiol 1998 ; 79: 2119—48.

12.

Enderby PM , Wood VA , Wade DT , Langton Hewer R. The Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test: a short, simple test for aphasia appropriate for non-specialists. Int Rehabil Med 1986; 8: 166—70.

13.

Aho K. , Harmsen P. , Hatano S. , Maraquardsen J. , Smirnov VE , Strasser T. Cerebrovascular disease in the community: results of a WHO collaborative study . Bull WHO 1980; 58: 113—30.

14.

Kertsez A. The Western Aphasia Battery. Grune & Stratton, 1982.

15.

Coates C. , Bakheit Amo. The prevalence of verbal communication disability in patients with Parkinson's disease. Disabil Rehabil 1997; 19: 104—107.

16.

Emery OB , Breslau LD Language deficits in depression: comparison with SDAT and normal aging. J Gerontol 1989; 44: M85—92.

17.

Geschwind N. Late changes in the nervous system: an overview. In Stein GD , Rosen JJ , Butters N eds. Plasticity and recovery of function in the central nervous system. Academic Press , 1974.

18.

Oldfield RC The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971; 9: 97—113.

19.

Greener J.

Aphasia therapy: what do clinicians offer?

RCSLT Bull 1998; 551: 11—12.

20.

Brindley P. , Copeland M. , Demain C. , Martyn P. A comparison of the speech of ten chronic Broca's aphasics following intensive and non-intensive periods of therapy. Aphasiology 1989; 3: 695—707.

21.

Wade DT , Langton Hewer R. Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis . J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987; 50: 177—82.

22.

Connor LT , Obler LK , Tocco M. , Fitzpatrick PM , Albert ML Effect of socioeconomic status on aphasia severity and recovery. Brain Lang 2001; 78: 254—57.

23.

Basso A. , Farabola M. , Grassi MP , Laiacona M. , Zanobio ME Aphasia in left-handers. Comparison of aphasia profiles and language recovery in non-right-handed and matched right-handed patients. Brain Lang 1990; 38: 233—52.

24.

de Riesthal M. , Wertz RT Prognosis for aphasia: relationship between selected biographical and behavioural variables and outcome and improvement . Aphasiology 2004; 18: 899—915.

25.

Bhogal S. , Teasell R. , Speecley M. Intensity of aphasia therapy, impact on recovery. Stroke 2003; 34: 987—93.

26.

Miekle M. , Wechsler E. , Tupper A. et al. Comparative trial of volunteer and professional treatments of dysphasia after stroke. BMJ 1979; 2: 87—89.

27.

Shewan CM , Kertsez A. effect of speech and language treatment on recovery from aphasia. Brain Lang 1984; 23: 272—99.

28.

Bakheit Amo , Carrington S. , Griffiths S. , Searle K. High scores on the Western Aphasia Battery correlate with good functional communication skills (as measured with the Communicative Effectiveness Index) in aphasic stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 287—91.

29.

Ross KR , Wertz RT Comparison of impairment and disability measures for assessing severity of, and improvement in, aphasia. Aphasiology 1999 ; 13: 113—24.

30.

Aftonomos LB , Steele RD , Applelbaum JS , Harris VM Relationship between impairment-level assessments and functional-level assessments in aphasia: findings from LCC treatment programmes . Aphasiology 2001; 15: 951—64.

31.

Bonita R. Epidemiology of stroke. Lancet 1992; 339: 342—44.