Editorial. Case-mix in rehabilitation: alternative ways of achieving the same goals. Clin Rehabil1999; 13: 183–185.
2.
Stineman MG. Function-related groups 101: a primer. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med1998; 10: 319–358.
3.
Stineman MG, Escarce JJ, Goin JE, Hamilton BB, Granger CV, Williams SV. A case-mix classification system for medical rehabilitation. Med Care1994; 32: 366–379.
4.
Stineman MG, Goin JE, Hamilton BB, Granger CV. Efficiency pattern analysis for medical rehabilitation. Am J Med Qual1995; 10: 190–198.
5.
Stineman MG, Goin JE, Granger CV, Fiedler RC, Williams SV. Discharge motor FIM-Function Related Groups. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1997; 78: 980–985.
6.
Stineman MG, Goin JE, Tassoni CJ, Granger CV, Williams SV. Classifying rehabilitation inpatients by expected functional gain. Med Care1997; 35: 963–973.
7.
Carter G, Relles D, Buchanan JL et al. A classification system for inpatient medical rehabilitation patients: a review of proposed revisions by the Functional Independence Measure-Function Related Groups [PM-682-HCFA], a project memorandum prepared for the Health Care Financing Administration by the RAND/UCLA/Harvard Center for Health Care Financing Policy Research, Santa Monica, CA, June 1997, pp. 1–88.
8.
Tesio L, Franchignoni FP, Perucca L, Porta GL. The influence of length of stay, functional independence and discharge destination of rehabilitation inpatients in Italy. Disabil Rehabil1996; 18: 502–508.
9.
Tesio L. The FIMtm system for quality assurance and classification of rehabilitation and chronic care inpatients. Applications of the Italian databank (in Italian). In: Capodaglio E, Passerino C eds. Classification systems for inpatient rehabilitation, I Documenti 7. Pavia, Italy: Le Collane della Fondazione Maugeri, 1996: 87–103.
10.
Bohannon RW, Cooper J. Predicting length of stay in the rehabilitation of stroke patients (Letter). Stroke1993; 24: 1295-1295.
11.
Franchignoni FP, Tesio L, Martino MT, Benevolo E, Castagna M. Length of stay of stroke rehabilitation inpatients: prediction through the Functional Independence Measure. Ann Ist Sup Sanità (Rome)1998; 34: 463–466.
12.
Stineman MG. Case-mix measurement in medical rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1995; 76: 1163–1170.
13.
Rampulla C, Bombelli PA, Balistreri F, Passerino C. Costs of DRG-coded hospital inpatient stay, in intensive rehabilitation units (in Italian). In: Capodaglio E, Passerino C eds. Classification systems for inpatient rehabilitation, I Documenti 7. Pavia, Italy: Le Collane della Fondazione Maugeri, 1996: 49–74.
14.
Fries BE, Schneider DP, Foley WJ, Gavazzi M, Burke R, Cornelius E. Refining a case-mix measure for nursing homes:resource utilization groups (RUG-III). Med Care1994; 23: 668–685.