The foundational economy perspective suggests that industries, which provide services essential to all citizens’ well-being and participation in everyday life, should be placed centrally in economic development policy. This article studies the extent to which local governments put emphasis on foundational industries in their strategies for development. Moreover, drivers behind priority-setting are examined. Based on an analysis of all 98 Danish municipalities’ planning strategies and semi-structured interviews with relevant actors from two rural municipalities, we find that foundational industries are to a great extent emphasised, even if they are not characterised as the foundation for economic development. Rather, foundational industries are prioritised in the absence of other options or when municipalities are not compelled to put local job creation as a crucial focus to attract and maintain inhabitants.
Aabenraa Municipality (2018) Sund Vækst - Vækststrategi 2018-2030 (Healthy Growth - Strategy for growth 2018-2030). Aabenraa Kommune.
2.
BélandDMarierP (2020)
COVID-19 and long-term care policy for older people in Canada. Journal of Aging & Social Policy32(4–5): 358–364.
3.
BenthamJBowmanAde la CuestaM, et al. (2013)
Manifesto for the foundational economy. CRESC working paper series131.
4.
BirklandTA (1997) After Disaster: Agenda Setting, Public Policy and Focusing Events.
Washington, DC:
Georgetown University Press.
5.
BrennerN (2004)
Urban governance and the production of new state spaces in Western Europe, 1960-2000. Review of International Political Economy11(3): 447–488.
6.
CairneyPZahariadisN (2016) Multiple streams approach: A flexible metaphor presents an opportunity to operationalize agenda setting processes. In: ZahariadisN (ed.) Handbook of Public Policy Agenda Setting.
Cheltenham:
Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 87–105.
7.
Cittaslow International (2017) Cittaslow International Charter. Available at: https://bit.ly/3spInLl (accessed 25 September, 2020).
8.
Danish Business Authority (2018) Planstrategi (planning strategy). Available at: https://bit.ly/2ExVaZh (accessed 25 September 2020).
9.
DannevigHHovelsrudGKHusabøIA (2013)
Driving the agenda for climate change adaptation in Norwegian municipalities. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy31: 490–505.
ForsythP (2005) International aviation: Globalisation and global industry. In: GangopadhyayPChatterjiM (eds) Economics of Globalisation.
Aldershot:
Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
12.
FothergillSGoreTWellsP (2019)
Industrial strategy and the UK regions: Sectorally narrow and spatially blind. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society12(3): 445–466.
13.
Foundational Economy Collective (2018) Foundational Economy: The Infrastructure of Everyday Life.
Manchester:
Manchester University Press.
14.
FroudJHaslamCJohalS, et al. (2020)
(How) does productivity matter in the foundational economy?Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit35(4): 316–336.
15.
GrubakL (2020) Global virksomhed ledte i hele Europa - valget faldt på Aabenraa (Global enterprise searched all over Europe - and chose Aabenraa). Jydske Vestkysten (accessed 27 February 2020).
16.
HansenTWintherL (2011)
Innovation, regional development and relations between high- and low-tech industries. European Urban and Regional Studies18(3): 321–339.
17.
HansenTWintherL (2014)
Competitive low-tech manufacturing and challenges for regional policy in the European context—Lessons from the Danish experience. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society7(3): 449–470.
18.
IRIS Group (2017) Kortlægning af turismefremmeindsatsen i Danmark (Mapping out efforts to promote tourism in Denmark). Available at: https://bit.ly/3gg6klW (accessed 25 September 2020).
19.
JonesBDBaumgartnerFR (2005) The Politics of Attention – How Government Prioritizes Problems.
Chicago, IL; London:
The University of Chicago Press.
20.
KingdonJW (1984) Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies.
Boston, MA: Little,
Brown and Co.
21.
KingdonJW (1995) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies.
New York, NY:
Harper Collins.
22.
Llwodraeth Cymru Welsh Government (2019) Wales 4.0 Delivering economic transformation for a better future of work. Available at: https://bit.ly/2FSK162 (accessed 25 September 2020).
23.
MartynovichMHansenTLundquistK-J (2020) Can foundational economy save regions in crisis? Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2061.
Utrecht University,
Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography.
24.
MayerHKnoxPL (2006)
Slow cities: Sustainable places in a fast world. Journal of Urban Affairs28(4): 321–334.
25.
MenckeMS (2020)
Salg af vaccineproduktion har gjort os sårbare (Sale of vaccine production has made us vulnerable). Kristeligt Dagblad. Available at: https://bit.ly/3uUVQw9 (accessed 25 September 2020).
26.
Ministry for Economic Affairs and the Interior (2014) Municipalities and regions – Tasks and financing. Available at: https://bit.ly/2OZFUtq (accessed 25 September 2020).
27.
Ministry of the Environment of Denmark (2002) Strategi og kommuneplanlægning – en vejledning (Strategy and municipal planning – a guide). Miljø- og Energiministeriet.
28.
MorettiE (2012) The New Geography of Jobs.
Boston, MA:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
29.
NormannHE (2015)
The role of politics in sustainable transitions: The rise and decline of offshore wind in Norway. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions15: 180–193.
30.
PattonMQ (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods.
Newbury Park, CA:
Sage Publications.
31.
PicchioA (2006) Unpaid Work and the Economy.
New York, NY:
Routledge.
32.
PikettyT (2014) Capital in the Twenty-First Century.
Boston, MA:
Harvard University Press.
33.
RaworthK (2017) Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist.
White River Junction, VT:
Chelsea Green Publishing.
34.
ReevesR (2018) The everyday economy. Available at: https://bit.ly/3kOdv3K (accessed 25 September 2020).
35.
Rodríguez-PoseAArbixG (2001)
Strategies of waste: Bidding wars in the Brazilian automobile sector. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research25(1): 134–154.
36.
SemmensJFreemanC (2012)
The value of Cittaslow as an approach to local sustainable development: A New Zealand perspective. International Planning Studies17(4): 353–375.
37.
Statistics Denmark (2018) Municipality groups v1:2018-. Available at: https://bit.ly/309BZwj (accessed 25 September 2020).
38.
Statistics Denmark (2020) BY1: Population 1. January by urban, rural areas, age and sex. Statistics Denmark. Available at: https://bit.ly/3mPRsvM (accessed 25 September 2020).
39.
Svendborg Municipality (2019) Planstrategi '19 (Planning Strategy '19). Svendborg Kommune.
40.
SwyngedouwE (1997) Neither global nor local: 'Glocalization' and the politics of scale. In: CoxK (ed.) Spaces of Globalization.
New York, NY:
Guilford Press, pp. 137–166.
41.
TownsendLSathiaseelanAFairhurstG, et al. (2013)
Enhanced broadband access as a solution to the social and economic problems of the rural digital divide. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit28(6): 580–595.
42.
YinRK (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods.
London:
SAGE Publications
43.
ZahariadisN (2007) The multiple streams framework: Structure, limitations, prospects. In: SabatierPA (ed.) Theories of the Policy Process.
Boulder, CO:
Westview Press, pp. 65–92.
