The purpose of the article is to explore how aesthetic-based competences are developed in and through leaders’ organisational practice and how these competences may lead to a sustainable learning practice in everyday life in organisations.
Design/methodology/approach:
The article focuses on how aesthetic-based experiments can change leaders’ organisational practice, when instrumental rationality is transformed into aesthetic rationality. This happens when leaders learn to move the everyday drama, the so-called social drama, into an aesthetic drama in order to transform organisational habits and devastating paradigms.
Findings:
The study of how leaders learn to transform their practice, based on a study at Copenhagen Business School in the period 2014–2017, documents that leaders can learn aesthetic performance that transforms their organisational practice when the learning processes are integrated into everyday life.
Originality/value:
The combination of aesthetic performance and learning processes has potential for a lasting and sustainable transformation, when the learning concept is rooted in leaders’ organisational practice as a bodily embedded aesthetic rationality.
AntonacopoulouEP (2001)
The paradoxical nature of the relationship between training and learning. Journal of Management Studies38: 3.
2.
ColemanRRingroseJ (2013) Deleuze and Research Methodologies.
Edinburgh:
Edinburgh University Press.
3.
DarsoL (2004) Artful Creation: Learning-Tales of Arts in Business.
Frederiksberg:
Samfundslitteratur.
4.
DeyPSteyaertC (2007)
The troubadours of knowledge: Passion and invention in management education. Organization14(3): 437–461.
5.
EdwardsG (2015) Community as Leadership.
Northampton, MA:
Edward Elgar Publishing.
6.
EngeströmYSanninoA (2011)
Discursive manifestations of contradictions in organisational change efforts. A methodological framework. Journal of Organizational Change Management24(3): 368–387.
7.
GagliardiP (2006) Exploring the aesthetic side of organizational life. In: CleggCHardySNordW (eds) Handbook of Organization Studies.
London:
Sage.
HelthP (2018) Learning in practice. PhD Series 05.2018, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark.
12.
KirbyM (1987) Acting and Not-Acting in a Formalist Theatre.
Philadelphia:
University of Pennsylvania Press.
13.
LadkinD (2008)
Leading beautifully: How mastery, congruence and purpose create the aesthetic of embodied leadership practice. The Leadership Quarterly19: 31–41.
14.
LadkinD (2013)
From perception to flesh: A phenomenological account of the felt experience of leadership. Leadership9(3): 320–324.
15.
LadkinDTaylorS (2010a)
Enacting the “true self”: Towards a theory of embodied authentic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly21: 64–74.
16.
LadkinDTaylorSS (2010b)
Leadership as art: Variations on a theme. Leadership6(3): 235–241.
17.
MackK (2012)
Taking an aesthetic risk in management education: Reflections on an artistic-aesthetic approach. Management Learning44(3): 286–304.
18.
MackK (2015)
Breaching or disturbing the peace? Organizational aesthetic encounters for informed and enlivened management learning. Management Learning46(2): 156–174.
19.
McKenzieJ (2001) Perform or Else.
New York:
Routledge.
20.
McNiffJWhiteheadJ (2011) All You Need to Know About Action Research.
London:
Sage.
SchönD (1983) The Reflective Practitioner. How Professionals Think in Action.
New York:
Basic Books.
29.
ShrivastavaPSchumacherGWasieleskiDM, et al. (2017)
Aesthetic rationality in organizations: Toward developing a sensitivity for sustainability. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science53(3): 369–411.
30.
SpringborgC (2010)
Leadership as art. Leaders coming to their senses. Leadership6(3): 243–258.
31.
StratiA (1992)
Aesthetic understanding of organizational life. The Academy of Management Review17: 568–581.
32.
StratiA (1999) Organization and Aesthetics.
London:
Sage.
33.
StratiA (2007)
Sensible knowledge and practice-based learning. Management Learning38(1): 61–77.
34.
StratiA (2009) Do you do beautiful things? Aesthetics and art in qualitative methods of organizational studies. In: BuchananDBrymanA (eds) The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods.
London:
Sage, pp. 230–245.
35.
SutherlandI (2013)
Arts-based methods in leadership development: Affording aesthetic workspaces, reflexivity and memories with momentum. Management Learning44(1): 25–43.
36.
TaylorSS (2013)
Little beauties: Aesthetics, crafts skill and the experience of beautiful action. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2013 22(1): 69–81.
37.
TaylorSHansenH (2005)
Finding form: Looking at the field of organizational aesthetics. Journal of Management Studies42(6): 1211–1231.
38.
TaylorSLadkinD (2009)
Understanding arts-based methods in managerial development. Academy of Management Learning & Education8(1): 55–69.
39.
TownleyB (2002)
Managing with modernity. Organization9: 549–573.
40.
TurnerV (1985) On the Edge of the Bush.
Tucson:
University of Arizona Press.
41.
Van MaanenJ (2011)
Ethnography as work: Some rules of engagement. Journal of Management Studies48(1): 218–234.
VinceRReynoldsM (2007) Introduction: Experiential learning and management education: Key themes and future directions. In: ReynoldsMVinceR (eds) The Handbook of Experiential Learning and Management Education.
London:
Oxford University Press.
44.
WintherH (2012) Det professionspersonlige. Om kroppen som klangbund i professionel kommunikation (side 74–89). In: WintherIH (ed.) Kroppens Sprog i Professionel Praksis- om Kontakt, Nærvær, Lederskab og Personlig Kommunikation.
København:
Billesø og Baltzer, pp. 74–89.
45.
WoodM (2005)
The fallacy of misplaced leadership. Journal of Management Studies42(6): 1101–1121.
