Social Enterprises have grown in number and scope in response to reductions in state-provided welfare and increasing ambition to improve social conditions. While a range of issues have been identified in the literature as affecting the ability of Social Enterprises to successfully conduct their activities, there is currently a dearth of research into the relative influence of these factors. This study explores and ranks the challenges faced by social entrepreneurs in South Wales. Based on a Delphi study with 21 social entrepreneurs, government policy-developers and scholars, it presents a hierarchy of 14 factors, useful instruments for informing social entrepreneurs and policy-makers about the way social enterprises are managed, and how national and local policy should be developed. As part of this, the study also identifies four novel factors that affect the sustainability of social enterprises: ‘Professionalisation of Marketing’, ‘Perception of Validity’, ‘Leadership’ and ‘Situatedness’.
AdamsJRobinsonP (2005) Regional economic policies in a devolved united kingdom. In: Seminar Paper 3. Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government.
3.
AhiPSearcyC (2013)
A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production52: 329–334.
4.
AlegreI (2015)
Social and economic tension in social enterprise: Does it exist?Social Business5(1): 17–32.
5.
BacqSJanssenFNoelC (2017) What happens next? A qualitative study of founder succession in social enterprise. Journal of Small Business Enterprise, In Press.
6.
BagnoliLMegaliC (2011)
Measuring performance in social enterprises. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly40(1): 149–165.
7.
BattilanaJLeeM (2014)
Advancing research on the hybrid organizing: Insights from the study of social enterprise. Academy of Management Annals8(1): 397–441.
8.
BediAAlpaslanCMGreenS (2016)
A meta-analytic review of ethical leadership outcomes and moderators. Journal of Business Ethics139(3): 517–536.
9.
BergeSCaldwellWMountP (2016)
Governance of nine Ontario food co-operatives. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics87(3): 457–474.
10.
BonnerJMGreenbaumRLMayerDM (2016)
My boss is morally disengaged: The role of ethical leadership in explaining the iterative effect of supervisor and employee moral disengagement on employee behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics137(4): 731–742.
11.
BoulkedidRAbdoulHLoustauMet al. (2011)
Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: A systematic review. PLos One.
12.
BrillJMBishopMJWalkerAE (2006)
The competencies and characteristics of an effective project manager: A web-based Delphi study. Educational Technology Research and Development54(2): 115–140.
13.
BrooksbankDCliftonNJones-EvansDet al. (2001)
The end of the beginning?: Welsh regional policy and objective one. European Planning Studies9(2): 255–274.
14.
BrownWA (2014) Antecedents to board member engagement in deliberation and decision making. In: CornforthCBrownWA (eds) Non Profit Governance: Innovative Perspectives and Approaches.
Abingdon:
Routledge, pp. 84–100.
15.
CAF (2016) Charities Aid Foundation. Available at: www.cafonline.org (accessed 20 September 2018).
16.
CampbellJMParkJ (2017)
Extending the resource-based view: Effects of strategic orientation toward community on small business performance. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services34: 302–208.
17.
ChanARyanSQuarterJ (2017)
Supported social enterprise: A modified social welfare organization. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly46(2): 261–279.
18.
ChildC (2016)
Tip of the iceberg: The non-profit underpinnings of for-profit social enterprise. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly45(2): 217–237.
19.
CornforthC (2014)
Understanding and combating mission drift in social enterprises. Social Enterprise Journal10(1): 3–20.
20.
CostanzoLAVurroDFosterDet al. (2014)
Dual-mission management in social entrepreneurship: Qualitative evidence from social firms in the United Kingdom. Journal of Small Business Management52(4): 655–667.
21.
CruckeSKnockaertM (2016)
When stakeholder representation leads to faultlines. A study of board service performance in social enterprises. Journal of Management Studies53(5): 768–793.
22.
CruckeSMorayNValletN (2015)
Internal representation and factional faultlines as antecedents for board performance in social enterprises. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics86(2): 385–400.
23.
CurtisTHerbstJGumkovskaM (2010)
The social economy of trust: Social entrepreneurship experiences in Poland. Social Enterprise Journal6(3): 194–209.
24.
DalkeyNHelmerO (1963)
An experimental application of the DELPHI method to the use of experts. Management Science9(3): 458–467.
25.
DavidRBlewittN (2004) The Socio-economic Characteristics of the South Wales Valleys in a Broader Context.
Cardiff:
Institute of Welsh Affairs.
26.
DeesJG (2012)
A tale of two cultures: Charity, problem solving, and the future of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics111(3): 321–334.
27.
DenscombeM (2010) The Good Research Guide: For Small-Scale Social Research Projects. 4th ed.
Berkshire:
McGraw-Hill Education.
28.
Dey P and Teasdale S (2016) The Tactical Mimicry of Social Enterprise Strategies: acting ‘as if’ in the everyday life of third sector organizations. Organization 23(4): 485–504.
29.
De VosAS (2005) Qualitative data analysis and interpretation. In: De VosASStrydomHFouchéCBet al. (eds) Research at Grass Roots for the Social Sciences and Human Services Professions. 3rd ed.
Pretoria:
Van Schaik Publishers, pp. 333–349.
30.
DohertyBHaughHLyonF (2014)
Social enterprises as hybrid organisations: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews16(4): 417–436.
31.
DomenicoMHaughHTraceyP (2010)
Social bricolage: Theorizing social value creation in social enterprises. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice34(4): 681–713.
32.
EbrahimABattailanaJMairJ (2014)
The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior34: 81–100.
33.
EngelkeHMaukschSDarkowIet al. (2016)
Heading toward a more social future? Scenarios for social enterprises in Germany. Business and Society55(1): 56–89.
34.
Fontes-FilhoJRBronsteinMM (2016)
Governance solutions in listed organisations and not-for-profit organisations. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics87(3): 391–410.
35.
FotiRJHansbroughTKEpitropakiOet al. (2017)
Dynamic viewpoints on implicit leadership and followership theories: Approaches, findings, and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly28(2): 261–267.
GandolfiFStoneS (2017)
The emergence of leadership styles: A clarified categorization. Review of International Comparative Management18(1): 18–30.
38.
GaryJEVon Der GrachtH (2015)
The future of foresight professionals: Results from a global Delphi study.Futures71: 132–145.
39.
GravelNMichelangeliATrannoyA (2006)
Measuring the social value of local public goods: An empirical analysis within Paris metropolitan area. Applied Economics38: 1945–1961.
40.
GriecoCMicheliniLLasevoliG (2015)
Measuring value creation in social enterprises: A cluster analysis of social impact assessment models. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly44(6): 1173–1193.
41.
HarerJB (2003)
Performance measures of quality for academic libraries implementing continuous improvement projects: A Delphi study. Advances in Library Administration and Organization20: 229–296.
42.
HaughH (2007)
Community-led social venture creation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice31(2): 161–182.
43.
HaughH (2012)
The importance of theory in social enterprise research. Social Enterprise Journal8(1): 7–15.
44.
Haven-TangCJonesE (2012)
Local leadership for rural tourism development: A case study of Adventa, Monmouthshire, UK. Tourism Management Perspective4: 28–35.
45.
HeikoA (2012)
Consensus measurement in Delphi studies: Review and implications for future quality assurance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change79(8): 525–1536.
46.
HicksDWaddockS (2016)
Dignity, wisdom and tomorrow’s ethical business leaders. Business and Society Review121(3): 447–462.
47.
HillRP (2017)
Fail of ethical leadership: Implications for stakeholder theory and anti-stakeholders. Business and Society Review122(2): 165–190.
48.
HinesF (2005)
Viable social enterprise: An evaluation of business support to social enterprises. Social Enterprise Journal1(1): 13–28.
49.
HockertsK (2017)
Determinants of social entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice41(1): 105–130.
50.
HoogendoornB (2016)
The prevalence and determinants of social entrepreneurship at the macro level. Journal of Small Business Management54(1): 278–296.
51.
HuybrechtsB (2012) Fair Trade Organizations and Social Enterprise: Social Innovation Through Hybrid Organization Models.
Abingdon:
Routledge.
52.
JennerP (2016)
Social enterprise sustainability revisited: An international perspective. Social Enterprise Journal12(1): 42–60.
53.
JennerPOprescuF (2016)
The sectorial trust of social enterprise: Friend or foe?Journal of Social Entrepreneurship7(2): 236–261.
54.
JickTD (1979)
Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulations in actions. Administrative Science Quarterly24(4): 602–611.
55.
JonesPMillerCPickernellDet al. (2011)
The role of education, training and skills development in social inclusion: The University of the Heads of the Valley case study. Education+ Training53(7): 638–651.
56.
KashmanianRM (2015)
Building a sustainable supply chain: Key elements. Environmental Quality Management24(3): 17–41.
57.
KatreASalipanteP (2012)
Start-up social ventures: Blending fine-grained behaviors from two institutions for entrepreneurial success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice36: 967–994.
58.
KerlinJA (2010)
Defining social enterprise across different contexts: A conceptual framework based on institutional factors. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly42(1): 84–108.
59.
KistruckGMBeamishPW (2010)
The interplay of form, structure, and embeddedness in social intrapreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice34(4): 735–761.
60.
KnifeKAHNHaughtonADixonE (2014)
Measuring sustainability and effectiveness of social value creation by social sector actors/social enterprises, within developing countries. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal20(1): 1–22.
61.
KosowHGassnerR (2008) Methods of Future and Scenario Analysis Overview, Assessment, And Selection Criteria. Studies 39.
Bonn:
German Development Institute.
62.
KurlandNBMcCaffreySJ (2016)
Social movement organization leaders and the creation of markets for “local” goods. Business & Society 55(7): 1017–1058.
63.
LarnerJMasonC (2014)
Beyond box-ticking: A study of stakeholder involvement in social enterprise governance. Corporate Governance14(2): 181–196.
64.
LehnerOMNichollsA (2014)
Social finance and crowd funding for social enterprise: A public private case study providing legitimacy and leverage. Venture Capital16(3): 271–286.
65.
LewisMW (2000)
Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review25(4): 760–776.
66.
LinstoneHATuroffM (1975) Introduction. In: LinstoneHATuroffM (eds) The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications.
Reading, MA:
Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, pp. 3–12.
67.
LittlewoodDHoltD (2015)
Social entrepreneurship in South Africa: Exploring the influence of environment. Business & Society 57(3): 525–561.
68.
LiuGEngTTakedaS (2015)
An investigation of marketing capabilities and social enterprise performance in the UK and Japan. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice39(2): 267–298.
69.
LiuGTakedaSKoW (2014)
Strategic orientation and social enterprise performance. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly43(3): 480–501.
70.
McKenzie-MohrD (2011) Fostering Sustainable Behaviour: An Introduction to Community-Based Social Marketing. 3rd ed.
Gabriola Island:
New Society Publishers.
71.
MartinM (2015)
Building impact business through hybrid financing. Entrepreneurship Research Journal5(2): 109–126.
72.
MasonCDohertyB (2016)
A fair trade-off? Paradoxes in the governance of fair-trade social enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics136(3): 451–469.
73.
MelnykSALummusRRVokurkaRJet al. (2009)
Mapping the future of supply chain management: A Delphi study. International Journal of Production Research47(16): 4629–4653.
74.
MitchellV (1992)
Using Delphi to forecast in new technology industries. Marketing Intelligence & Planning10(2): 4–9.
75.
MoSShiJ (2017)
Linking ethical leadership to employee burnout, workplace deviance and performance: Testing the mediating roles of trust in leader and surface acting. Journal of Business Ethics144(2): 293–303.
76.
ModiPSahiGK (2017)
Toward a greater understanding of the market orientation and internal market orientation relationship. Journal of Strategic Marketing▪: 1–18.
77.
MohammedAWhiteGRTWangXet al. (2018)
IT adoption in social care: A study of the factors that mediate technology adoption. Strategic Change27(3): 267–279.
78.
MookLChanAKershawD (2015)
Measuring social enterprise value creation: The case of furniture bank. Nonprofit Management and Leadership26(2): 189–205.
79.
MswakaWAlukoO (2015)
Corporate governance practices and outcomes in social enterprises in the UK: A case study.International Journal of Public Sector Management28(1): 57–71.
80.
MunozSA (2010)
Towards a geographical research agenda for social enterprise. Area42(3): 302–312.
81.
MunozSFarmerJWintertonRet al. (2015)
The social enterprise as a space of well-being: An exploratory case study. Social Enterprise Journal11(3): 281–302.
82.
NorthousePG (2015) Leadership: Theory and Practice.
Los Angeles, CA:
Sage.
83.
OhanaMMeyerMSwatonS (2010)
Decision-making in social enterprises: Exploring the link between employee participation and organizational commitment. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly42(6): 1092–1110.
84.
OkoliCPawlowskiSD (2004)
The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications. Information and Management42(1): 15–29.
85.
PaliwodaSJ (1983)
Predicting the future using Delphi. Management Decision21(1): 31–38.
86.
ParrisDLPeacheyJW (2013)
A systematic literature review of servant leadership theory in organizational contexts. Journal of Business Ethics113(3): 377–393.
87.
PathakSMurlidharanE (2017)
Economic inequality and social entrepreneurship. Business & Society 57(6): 1150–1190.
88.
PeattieKMorelyA (2008)
Eight paradoxes of the social enterprise research agenda. Social Enterprise Journal4(2): 91–107.
89.
PeattieKJSamuelA (2015)
Places where people matter: The marketing dynamics of Fairtrade Towns. Social Business5(3): 237–254.
90.
PetryKMaesBVlaskamC (2007)
Operationalizing quality of life for people with profound multiple disabilities: A Delphi study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research51(5): 334–349.
91.
RayPKSahuS (1990)
Productivity management in India: A Delphi study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management10(5): 25–51.
92.
ReiserDBDeanSA (2014)
Creative financing for social enterprise. Stanford Social Innovation Review▪: 50–54.
93.
Rey-MartiARibeiro-SorianoDPalacios-MarquesD (2016a)
A bibliometric analysis of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research69: 1651–1655.
94.
Rey-MartiARibeiro-SorianoDSanchez-GarciaJL (2016b)
Giving back to society: Job creation through social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research69: 2067–2072.
95.
RichardsAReedJ (2015)
Social capital’s role in the development of volunteer-led cooperatives. Social Enterprise Journal11(1): 4–23.
96.
Sakarya S, Bodur M, Oktem OY and Selekler-Goksen N (2012) Social alliances: business and social enterprise collaboration for social transformation. Journal of Business Research 65(12): 1710–1720.
97.
SamuelAWhiteGRTMartinHet al. (2017)
Influencing Fairtrade consumption through servant leadership: Bruce Crowther’s story. Society and Business Review13(2): 170–183.
98.
SandersMLMcClellanJG (2014)
Being business-like while pursuing a social mission: Acknowledging the inherent tensions in US nonprofit organizing. Organization21(1): 68–89.
99.
SantosFPacheA-CBirkholzC (2015)
Making hybrids work: Aligning business models and organisational design for social enterprise. California Management Review57(3): 36–58.
100.
SassmannshausenSPVolkmannC (2016)
The scientometrics of social entrepreneurship and its establishment as an academic field. Journal of Small Business Management56(2): 251–273.
101.
SchollWKonigCMeyerBet al. (2004)
The future of knowledge management: An international Delphi study. Journal of Knowledge Management8(2): 19–35.
102.
ScholtenKSchilderS (2015)
The role of collaboration in supply chain resilience. Supply Chain Management20(4): 471–484.
103.
SeanorPBullMBainesSet al. (2014)
Where social enterprise practitioners draw the line. International Journal of Public Sector Management27(4): 353–368.
ShinYSungAYChoiJNet al. (2015)
Top management ethical leadership and firm performance: Mediating role of ethical and procedural justice climate. Journal of Business Ethics129(1): 43–57.
106.
SkulmoskiGJHartmanFTKrahnJ (2007)
The Delphi method for graduate research. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research6(1): 1–21.
StevensRMorayNBruneelJet al. (2015)
Attention allocation to multiple goals: The case of for-profit social enterprise. Strategic Management Journal36(7): 1006–1016.
109.
StevensRMorayNBruneelS (2014)
The social and economic mission of social enterprises: Dimensions, measurement, validation and relation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice39(5): 1051–1082.
110.
StevensonH (2010)
Paradox: A gestalt theory of change for organizations. Gestalt Review14(2): 111–126.
111.
SudhaKSShahnawazMGFarhatA (2016)
Leadership styles, leader’s effectiveness and well-being: Exploring collective efficacy as a mediator. Vision20(2): 111–120.
112.
TeasdaleS (2010) What’s in a Name? The Construction of Social Enterprise. Third Sector Research Centre, Working Paper 46. University of Birmingham.
113.
ThorgrenSOmoredeA (2018)
Passionate leaders in social entrepreneurship: Exploring and African context. Business & Society 57(3): 481–524.
114.
TianYSmithWK (2014)
Entrepreneurial leadership of social enterprises: Challenges and skills for embracing paradoxes. Journal of Leadership Studies8(3): 42–45.
115.
TuanY-F (1977) Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience.
Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press.
116.
Uhl-BienMRiggioRELoweKBet al. (2014)
Followership theory: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly25(1): 83–104.
117.
Villeneuve-SmithFTempleN (2015) State of Social Enterprise Survey, Leading the World in Social Enterprise’.
Social Enterprise UK. Available at: Socialenterprise.org.uk (accessed 2 March 2017).
118.
WAG (2008) The Wales Spatial Plan 2008 Update People, Places, Future.
Cardiff:
Welsh Assembly Government.
119.
WatsonT (2008)
Public relations research priorities: A Delphi study. Journal of Communication Management12(2): 104–123.
120.
WeidnerKWeberCGobelM (2016)
You scratch my back and i scratch yours: Investigating inter-partner legitimacy in relationships between social enterprises and their key partners. Business & Society▪: 1–40.
121.
WentholtMTAFrewerLJ (2010) Expert views on European research needs regarding emerging infectious animal diseases: Results of a Delphi study. In: Coordination of European Research on Emerging and Major Infectious Diseases of Livestock. MCB Group. Waginengen, Netherlands, pp. 1–76.
122.
WhitmanJR (2009)
Measuring social values in philanthropic foundations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership19(3): 305–325.
123.
WickiSKaaijJVD (2007)
Is it true love between the octopus and the frog? How to avoid the authenticity gap. Corporate Reputation Review10(4): 312–318.
124.
YinRK (2013) Case Study Research: Design and Methods.
London:
SAGE.
125.
YoungDRKimC (2015)
Can social enterprise remain sustainable and mission-focused? Applying resilience theory. Social Enterprise Journal11(3): 233–259.
126.
ZainonSAhmadSAAtanRet al. (2014)
Legitimacy and sustainability of social enterprise: Governance and accountability. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences145: 152–157.
