Workforce development programs in the United States have increasingly focused on two critical approaches: Learning at work and experience as education. Workforce development programs are increasingly aimed at making territories more competitive by strengthening labor markets and helping to meet the needs of employers in significant sectors of the economy. Workforce development in Upstate New York is an important step forward in preventing the region from lagging behind other regions in the country. In this paper, we examine the role of the Capital Region Workforce Investment Board, a local workforce improvement board under the supervision of the New York State Workforce Investment Board. Specifically, we evaluate the impacts of the new Capital Region Workforce Investment Board’s Program on the federally funded Workforce Investment Act of 1998 Adult Program priorities. Before-and-after analysis comparing the program outcomes in two four year periods, 2006–2009 and 2010–2013 are presented. The results of the new plan are mixed across several key performance indicators. Evidence shows that the new focuses increased the average earnings of program participants in a situation where employment rates decreased slightly. Significant industries for 2012–2022 are also reviewed.
AgtmaelABakkerF (2016) The Smartest Places on Earth: Why Rustbelts Are the Emerging Hotspots of Global Innovation.
New York:
Public Affairs.
2.
AndersonE (2006) Jobs are just the start. Times Union, 5 February, c1.
3.
AndersonE (2009) Regional job centers to get federal funds. Times Union, 12 March, c2.
4.
AndersonE (2014) 20,000 Jobs need filling. Times Union, 19 January, A1.
5.
BaerW (1997)
General plan evaluation criteria: An approach to making plans better. Journal of the American Planning Association63(3): 329–344.
6.
BalsasC (2004)
Measuring the livability of an urban centre: An exploratory study of key performance indicators. Planning, Practice & Research19: 101–110.
7.
BardachE (2005) A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis: The Eightfold Path to More Effective Problem Solving.
Washington, DC:
CQ Press.
8.
BarnowBKingC (eds) (2000) Improving the Odds: Increasing the Effectiveness of Publicly Funded Training.
Washington, DC:
Urban Institute Press.
9.
BarnowBKingC (2005) The Workforce Investment Act in Eight States.
Albany, NY:
The Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government.
10.
BerryD (1998)
The jobs and workforce initiative: Northeast Ohio employers’ plan for workforce development. Economic Development Quarterly12(1): 41–53.
11.
BuserM (2012)
The production of space in metropolitan regions: A Lefebvrian analysis of governance and spatial change. Planning Theory11(3): 279–298.
12.
Capital Region Workforce Investment Board (2005) Capital region workforce investment board comprehensive three-year plan July 2005–June 2008. Available at: www.capreg.org/537.pdf (accessed 20 December 2016).
13.
ChappleK (2010) Are best practices really better? Stories from the workforce development frontier. In: GilothRAustinC (eds) Mistakes to Success: Learning and Adapting When Things Go Wrong.
Bloomington:
iUniverse, pp. 73–91.
DeckerPBerkJ (2011)
Ten years of the Workforce Investment Act (WIA): Interpreting the research on WIA and related programs. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management30(4): 906–926.
16.
DrapkinJ (2012) Economic development in New York State. In: BenjaminG (ed) The Oxford Handbook of New York State Government and Politics.
New York:
Oxford University Press, pp. 735–768.
17.
EubanksV (2012) Digital Dead End: Fighting for Social Justice in the Information Age.
Cambridge:
MIT Press.
18.
FischerDMackMWoodruff-BolteS (2015) Seeking a State Workforce Strategy.
New York:
Center for an Urban Future.
19.
FitzgeraldJ (2006) Moving up in the New Economy: Career Ladders for U.S. workers.
Ithaca, NY:
Cornell University Press.
20.
FloridaR (2010) The Great Reset: How New Ways of Living and Working Drive Post-Crash Prosperity.
New York:
HarperCollins.
21.
FuchsEHareRNudellH (2008) Innovations in City Government: The Case of New York City’s Workforce Development System. New York: Working paper of the Case Study Series in Global Policy of Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs. Available at: www.mpa.org.cn/upload/20130821/5751940.pdf (accessed 28 December 2016).
22.
GilothR (2000)
Learning from the field: Economic growth and workforce development in the 1990s. Economic Development Quarterly14(4): 340–359.
23.
GordonJ (2004) Growing capital region faces future challenges. Employment in New York State – NYS DL’s Newsletter, July, 2.
24.
GrubbNBadwayNBellDet al. (1999) Toward Order from Chaos. State Efforts to Reform Workforce Development Systems.
Berkeley, CA:
National Center for Research in Vocational Education.
25.
GrubbNMcDonnellL (1996)
Combatting program fragmentation: Local systems of vocational education and job training. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management15(2): 252–270.
26.
HawleyJ (2015) Workforce development. In: PoellRRoccoTRothG (eds) The Routledge Companion to Human Resource Development.
New York:
Routledge, pp. 181–192.
27.
HawleyJTaylorJ (2006)
How business associations use inter-organizational networks to achieve workforce development goals: Implications for human resource development. Human Resource Development International9(4): 485–508.
28.
HollandB (2016)
Both sides now: Toward the dual customer approach under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act in the United States. Local Economy31(3): 424–441.
29.
JacobsRHawleyJ (2009) The emergence of ‘workforce development’: Definition, conceptual boundaries and implications. In: MacleanRWilsonD (eds) International Handbook of Education for the Changing World of Work – Bridging Academic and Vocational Learning.
Dordrecht:
Springer, pp. 2537–2552.
30.
KingCSmithTSchroederD (2009) Evaluating Local Workforce Investments: Results for Short- and Long-Term Training in Austin (TX).
Austin:
University of Texas at Austin.
31.
KnudsonP (2012)
Regional industrial recruitment in Upstate New York. State and Local Government Review44(1): 21–32.
32.
MalgorzataKSimonF (2013) OECD Reviews of Vocational Education and Training – A Skills Beyond School Review of the United States.
Paris:
OECD Publishing.
33.
MeléndezEBorges-MendezRVisserMet al. (2015)
The restructured landscape of economic development challenges and opportunities for regional workforce development collaborations. Economic Development Quarterly29(2): 150–166.
34.
NeigherW (2003)
The process is the plan: Defining strategic community futures. Evaluation and Program Planning26(4): 441–457.
35.
New York State Department of Labor (2009) Capital region workforce investment board local plan modification July 1, 2009–June 30, 2010. Available at: www.capreg.org/pdf/CRWIB-LocalPlanModification8-20-2009.pdf (accessed 20 December 2016).
New York State Department of Labor (2014) Capital region workforce investment board local plan July 1, 2014–June 30, 2015. Available at: www.capreg.org/pdf/CRWIB-Local-Plan-2014-2015-Draft.pdf (accessed 28 December 2016).
38.
O’SheaDKingC (2001) The Workforce Investment Act of 1998: Restructuring Workforce Development Initiatives in States and Localities.
Albany, NY:
The Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government.
RossiP (1999) Evaluating community development programs: Problems and prospects. In: FergusonRDickensW (eds) Urban Problems and Community Development.
Washington, DC:
The Brookings Institution, pp. 521–567.
41.
SawickiD (1988) Policy analysis. In: CataneseASnyderJ (eds) Urban Planning.
New York:
McGraw-Hill, pp. 54–74.
42.
SchaeferSWarnerLGatesSet al. (2013) Ensuring the Capital Region’s Global Success – Reversing Our “Skills Gaps” Through High School Education Models.
Washington, DC:
America’s Edge.
43.
SchrockG (2014)
Connecting people and place prosperity workforce development and urban planning in scholarship and practice. Journal of Planning Literature29(3): 257–271.
44.
SchultzLWagnerAGeraceAet al. (2015) Workforce development in a targeted, multi-sector economic development strategy: The case of SUNY’s College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering. In: HornCEdwardsTGreeneT (eds) Transforming US Workforce Development Policies for the 21st Century.
Kalamazoo, MI:
W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, pp. 341–352.
45.
ShahabSClinchJO’NeillE (2017) Impact-based planning evaluation: Advancing normative criteria for policy analysis. Environment and Planning B. Epub ahead of print July 21, 2017. DOI: 10.1177/2399808317720446.
46.
ThomasD (2006)
A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation27(2): 237–246.
47.
Van HornC (2014) Working Scared (or Not at All): The Lost Decade, Great Recession, and Restoring the Shattered American Dream.
Lanham, MD:
Rowman & Littlefield.
48.
WalshR (2009)
NYC Business solutions: Linking economic and workforce development in New York City. Local Economy24(1): 98–103.
49.
Wolf-PowersL (2004) Building a workforce infrastructure. In: HanleyR (ed) Moving People, Goods and Information in the 21st Century: The Cutting-Edge Infrastructures of Networked Cities.
New York:
Routledge, pp. 245–259.
WrightDMontielL (2010) Workforce System One-Stop Services for Public Assistance and Other Low-Income Populations.
Albany, NY:
The Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government.
