This paper explores the emerging changes in the relationships between cities and their suburbs driven by international institutional. This paper discusses these trends within the new tropes of integration and multi-level governance that are serving to redefine and implement new city/suburban relationships with an emphasis on the role of functional economic areas. This shift suggests a fundamental re-conceptualisation of the power relationships with city dominance dependent on suburban success not serendipity. The underlying re-conceptualisation of this relationship is explored through a discussion of international institutional drivers as they are being implemented throughout states that are OECD members and then considers how these changes are being nudged into effect using statecraft and scalecraft practices. It further examines practices in the UK and concludes with a discussion of these new negotiated relationships between cities and suburbs.
AccetturoAManaresiFMocettiSet al.(2014) Don’t stand so close to me: The urban impact of immigration. Regional Science and Urban Economics45: 45–56.
2.
AhrendRFarchyEKaplanisIet al.(2014) What Makes Cities More Productive? Evidence on the Role of Urban Governance from Five OECD Countries. Regional Development Working Paper 2014/05. Paris: OECD.
3.
Ahrend R and Schumann A (2014) Does Regional Economic Growth Depend on Proximity to Urban Centres? OECD Regional Development Working Papers 2014/07. Paris: OECD.
4.
AllmendingerPHaughtonG (2010) Spatial planning, devolution, and new planning spaces. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy28(5): 803–818.
5.
Berry BJL (1967) Functional Economic Areas and Consolidated Urban Regions of the US. Final Report of the Social Sciences Research Council Study of Metropolitan Area Classification. Social Sciences Research Council, New York.
6.
BezesPParradoS (2013) Trajectories of administrative reform: Institutions, timing and choices in France and Spain. West European Politics36(1): 22–50.
7.
Blom-HansenJ (2010) Municipal amalgamations and common pool problems: The Danish local government reform in 2007. Scandinavian Political Studies33(1): 51–73.
8.
BotermanWRKarstenL (2014) On the spatial dimension of the gender division of paid work in two-parent families: The case of Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie105(1): 107–116.
9.
BrennerN (1999) Globalisation as reterritorialisation: The re-scaling of urban governance in the European Union. Urban Studies36(3): 431–451.
10.
BrennerN (2004) New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
BrezziMVeneriP (2014) Assessing Polycentric Urban Systems in the OECD: Country, Regional and Metropolitan Perspectives. OECD Regional Development Working Papers 2014/01. Paris: OECD.
12.
BullerJJamesTS (2012) Statecraft and the assessment of national political leaders: The case of new labour and Tony Blair. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations14(4): 534–555.
13.
BulpittJ (1986) The discipline of the new democracy: Mrs Thatcher’s domestic statecraft. Political Studies34(1): 19–39.
14.
CarbonellAYaroB (2005) American spatial development and the new megalopolis. Land Lines17(2): 1–4.
15.
CEC (1999) The European Spatial Development Perspective, Brussels: CEC.
16.
CEC (2015) Results of the Public Consultation on the Key Features of An EU Urban Agenda. Commission Staff Working Paper SWD (20-15) 109/final, Brussels: CEC.
17.
CharbitC (2011) Governance of Public Policies in Decentralized Contexts: The Multi-level Approach. OECD Regional Level Working Papers 2011/04, Paris: OECD.
18.
Cork Local Government Committee (2015) Local Government Arrangements in Cork. The Report of the Cork Local Government Committee, September, Cork: Local Government Committee.
19.
Coughlan S (2016) Are cities the new countries? BBC News Online, 21 January. Available at: www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-35305586 (accessed 7 March 2016).
20.
DCLG (2008a) Review of Economic Assessment and Strategy Activity at the Local and Sub-regional Level, London: DCLG.
21.
DCLG (2008b) Planning and Optimal Geographical Levels for Economic Decision Making- the Sub-Regional Role, London: DCLG.
22.
DCLG (2008c) Why Place Matters and the Implications of Role of Central, Regional and Local Government, London: DCLG.
23.
DijkstraLPoelmanH (2012) Cities in Europe: The New EU OECD Definition, Brussels: CEC.
24.
FilionP (2013) Optimistic and pessimistic perspectives on the evolution of the North American suburb. Planning Theory and Practice14(3): 411–413.
25.
FraserA (2010) The craft of scalar practices. Environment and Planning A42(2): 332–346.
Goodwin P (2012) Peak Travel, Peak Car and the Future of Mobility: Evidence, Unresolved Issues, and Policy Implications, and a Research Agenda. International Transport Forum Discussion Papers, No. 2012/13. Paris: OECD.
31.
GrantJLNelsonACForsythAet al.(2013) Suburbs in transition. Planning Theory and Practice14(3): 391–415.
HaglerY (2009) Defining US Megaregions. America 2050, New York: RPA.
34.
HamzaCFrangenheimACharlesDet al.(2014) The Role of Cities in Cohesion Policy, Brussels: CEC.
35.
Headicar P (2015) Homes, jobs and commuting: Development location and travel outcomes. In: Hickman RP, Givoni M, Bonilla D, et al. (eds) International Handbook on Transport and Development, Edward Elgar Cheltenham, pp. 59–72.
36.
Hjorthol R and Vågane L (2014). Allocation of tasks, arrangement of working hours and commuting in different Norwegian households. Journal of Transport Geography, 35: 75–83.
37.
HMT (2003) Productivity in the UK 4 – The Local Dimension, London: HMT.
38.
JessopB (1997) The entrepreneurial city: Re-imaging localities, redesigning economic governance, or restructuring capital. Transforming Cities: Contested Governance and New Spatial Divisions46: 28–41.
39.
KarstenL (2003) Family gentrifiers: Challenging the city as a place simultaneously to build a career and to raise children. Urban Studies40(12): 2573–2584.
40.
KatzBBradleyJ (2013) The Metropolitan Revolution How Cities and Metros Are Fixing Our Broken Politics and Fragile Economy, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Kaufmann D, Léautier F and Mastruzzi M (2005) Governance and the City: An Empirical Exploration into Global Determinants of Urban Performance. Policy Research Working Paper No. 3712. Washington, DC: World Bank.
43.
KingdonJW (1984) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public PoliciesVol. 45. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
44.
KorttMADolleryBDrewJ (2016) Municipal mergers in New Zealand: An empirical analysis of the proposed amalgamation of Hawke’s Bay councils. Local Government Studies42(2): 228–247.
45.
KrugmanP (1991) Geography and Trade, Cambridge: MIT Press.
46.
KrugmanP (2011) The new economic geography, now middle-aged. Regional Studies45(1): 1–8.
47.
LangRNelsonA (2009) Megapolitan America: Applying a new geography. In: RossC (ed.) Megaregions: Planning for Global Competitiveness, London: Island Press, pp. 107–126.
48.
Lloyd G and Purves G (2009) Identity and territory the creation of a national planning framework for Scotland. In: Davoudi S and Strange I (ed) Conceptions of Space and Place in Strategic Spatial Planning, Routledge RTPI Library Series: Abingdon, pp. 71–94.
49.
LundqvistLJ (2016) Planning for climate change adaptation in a multi-level context: The Gothenburg metropolitan area. European Planning Studies24(1): 1–20.
50.
MatthewsPBramleyGHastingsA (2015) Homo economicus in a Big Society: Understanding middle-class activism and NIMBYism towards new housing developments. Housing, Theory and Society32(1): 54–72.
51.
McFarlaneKSolomonRMemonA (2015) Designing institutions for strategic spatial planning: Auckland’s governance reforms. Urban Policy and Research33(4): 452–471.
52.
Merk O (2014) Metropolitan Governance of Transport and Land Use in Chicago. OECD Regional Development Working Papers, 2014/08. Paris: OECD.
53.
MetzD (2013) Peak car and beyond: The fourth era of travel. Transport Reviews3(3): 255–270.
MorphetJ (2011) Effective Practice in Spatial Planning, Abingdon: Routledge.
56.
Morphet J (2017) Combined authorities – The next big thing? Town and Country Planning March: 96–103.
57.
OECD (2013) Definition of Functional Urban Areas for the OECD Metropolitan Database, Paris: OECD.
58.
OECD (2015) Local Economic Leadership, Paris: OECD.
59.
OECD (2016) OECD Territorial Reviews: The Metropolitan Region of Rotterdam-The Hague, Netherlands, Paris: OECD Publishing.
60.
Pemberton S (2016). Statecraft, scalecraft and local government reorganisation in Wales. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 34(7), 1306–1323.
61.
PembertonSMorphetJ (2014) The rescaling of economic governance: Insights into the transitional territories of England. Urban Studies51(11): 2354–2370.
62.
PembertonSSearleG (2016) Statecraft, scalecraft and urban planning: A comparative study of Birmingham, UK, and Brisbane, Australia. European Planning Studies24(1): 76–95.
63.
PhelpsNAVentoATRoitmanS (2015) The suburban question: Grassroots politics and place making in Spanish suburbs. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy33(3): 512–532.
64.
PickupL (1978) Women’s gender-role and its influence on travel behaviour. Built Environment10(1): 61–68.
65.
PlussL (2015) Municipal councillors in metropolitan governance: Assessing the democratic deficit of new regionalism in Switzerland. European Urban and Regional Studies22(3): 261–284.
66.
Porter MG and de Roo G (eds) (2012) Fuzzy Planning: The Role of Actors in a Fuzzy Governance Environment. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
67.
RandallJCasebourneJ (2016) Making Devolution Deals Work, London: Institute for Government.
68.
RératPLeesL (2011) Spatial capital, gentrification and mobility: Evidence from Swiss core cities. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers36(1): 126–142.
69.
RératP (2012) The new demographic growth of cities: the case of reurbanisation in Switzerland. Urban Studies49(5): 1107–1125.
RossCWooM (2009) Identifying megaregions in the United States; implications for infrastructure. In: RossC (ed.) Megaegions; Planning for Global Competitiveness, London: Island Press, pp. 53–82.
72.
SandfordM (2016) Combined Authorities. House of Commons Library Note, London: House of Commons.
73.
Sassen S (2011) Cities in a World Economy. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
SkaburskisA (2012) Gentrification and Toronto’s changing household characteristics and income distribution. Journal of Planning Education and Research32(2): 191–203.
76.
SteadD (2014) The rise of territorial governance in European policy. European Planning Studies22(7): 1368–1383.
