This study aims to reflect on the views of public sector managers in relation to possible ways to cope with austerity budgeting and its impact on public services provided to local communities across a subregion. The investigation draws on empirical research based on a series of facilitated strategic workshops delivered to over 400 UK local authority middle managers. The findings indicate a suggested process model and framework to enable the implementation of a customer-driven approach to the delivery of local community public services. The intent of this study was to enable understanding of a particular case and to share that new understanding more widely. The overall approach is based on a ‘common-sense’ view of generalisability, in which readers will find value if the material resonates with their experience. This study is of potential benefit to researchers and those involved in developing effective and sustainable methods of coping with increasingly severe budgetary constraints on public sector local community provision. The study contributes to the extant literature by investigation of practitioner perspectives on these issues.
BovairdT (2007) Beyond engagement and participation: User and community co-production of public services. Public Administration Review67(5): 846–860.
5.
BovairdTLoefflerE (2012) From engagement to co-production: The contribution of users and communities to outcomes and public value. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations23(4): 1119–1138.
6.
BuntLHarrisM (2010) Mass Localism: A Way to Help Small Communities Solve Big Social Challenges, London: NESTA.
7.
CalderwoodEDaviesK (2013) Localism and the community shop. Local Economy28(3): 339–349.
8.
CarrS (2010) Personalisation: A Rough Guide, London: SCIE.
9.
ClarkCGioiaDKetchenJet al.(2010) Transitional identity as a facilitator of organizational Identity change during a merger. Administrative Science Quarterly55(3): 397–438.
Department of Health (2009) Working to Put People First: The Strategy for the Adult Social Care Workforce in England, London: Department of Health.
13.
DuroseC (2009) Front line workers and “local knowledge”: Neighbourhood stories in contemporary UK local governance. Public Administration87(1): 35–49.
14.
EwertBEversA (2012) Co-production: Contested meanings and challenges for user organisations. In: PestoffVBrandsenTVerschuereB (eds) New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production, London: Routledge, pp. 61–78.
15.
GioiaDACorleyKGHamiltonAL (2012) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organisational Research Methods16(1): 15–31.
16.
HastingsABaileyNGannonMet al.(2015) Coping with the cuts? The management of the worst financial settlement in living memory. Local Government Studies41(4): 601–621.
17.
HigsonPSturgessA (2014) Uncommon Leadership: How to Gain Competitive Advantage by Thinking Differently, London: Kogan Page.
HMGovernment (2011) White Paper on Open Public Services, London: HM Government.
20.
HorneMShirleyT (2009) Co-production in Public Services: A New Partnership with Citizens, London: Prime Minister’s Strategy Unit.
21.
Institute of Customer Service (2009) “It’s a Culture Thing”: The Challenge of Change – Customer Service in Local Government. London: Institute of Customer Service and Warwick University.
22.
JonesPLayardASpeedS (2012) Localism and Connected Neighbourhood Planning, Swindon: Arts & Humanities Research Council.
23.
LawlerJHearnJ (1995) UK public sector organizations: The rise of managerialism and the impact of change on social services departments. International Journal of Public Sector Management8(4): 7–16.
24.
LeachK (2013) Community economic development: Localisation, the key to a resilient and inclusive local economy?Local Economy28(7–8): 927–931.
LowndesVGardnerA (2016) Local governance under the conservatives: Super-austerity, devolution and the “smarter state”. Local Government Studies42(3): 357–375.
27.
McCullochA (2009) The student as co-producer: Learning from public administration about the student–university relationship. Studies in Higher Education34(2): 171–183.
28.
McEldowneyJ (2016) Delivering public services in the United Kingdom in a period of austerity. In: WollmannHKoprićIMarcouG (eds) Public and Social Services in Europe: From Public and Municipal to Private Sector Provision, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 41–54.
29.
MorseA (2013) Case Study on Integration: Measuring the Costs and Benefits of Whole-Place Community Budgets. Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, London: National Audit Office.
30.
NagRGioiaD (2012) From common to uncommon knowledge: Foundations of firm-specific use of knowledge as a resource. Academy of Management Journal55: 421–457.
31.
NeedhamC (2007) Realising the potential of co-production: Negotiating improvements in public services. Social Policy and Society7(2): 221–231.
32.
Needham C and Carr S (2009) SCIE research briefing 31: Co-production: An emerging evidence base for adult social care transformation. Available at: www.scie.org.uk/publications/briefings/briefing31/ (accessed 29 June 2017).
33.
Needham C, Durose C, Mangan C, et al. (2014) Evaluating co-production: Pragmatic approaches to building the evidence base. In: Co-production panel, political studies association conference, Manchester, UK, 14–16 April 2014, pp. 1–24..
34.
O’ReillyDReedM (2010) “Leaderism”: An evolution of managerialism in UK public service reform. Public Administration88: 960–978.
35.
OvermansJFANoordegraafM (2014) Managing austerity: Rhetorical and real responses to fiscal stress in local government. Public Money and Management34(2): 99–106.
36.
ParkerSHeapyJ (2006) Journey to the Interface: How Public Service Design Can Connect Users to Reform, London: Demos.
37.
PattonMQ (2008) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, London: Sage.
38.
PembertonSMasonJ (2009) Co-production and sure start children’s centres: Reflecting upon users’, perspectives and implications for service delivery, planning and evaluation. Social Policy and Society8(1): 13–24.
SteenTNabatchiTBrandD (2016) Introduction: Special issue on the co-production of public services. International Review of Administrative Sciences82(1): 3–7.
46.
StewartJClarkeM (1987) The public service orientation: Issues and dilemmas. Public Administration65: 161–177.
47.
SvaraJH (2017) Re-inventing and re-designing local government. In: WardJD (ed.) Leadership and Change in Public Sector Organisations: Beyond Reform, London: Routledge, pp. 22–39.
VanleeneDVoetsJVerschuereB (2017) Co-producing a nicer neighbourhood: Why do people participate in local community development projects?Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self Government15(1): 111–132.
50.
VarneyD (2006) Service Transformation: A Better Service for Citizens and Businesses, a Better Deal for the Taxpayer, Norwich: HMSO.
