The role of family firms within economic growth and development has been neglected, and family business dimensions have been overlooked in regional intervention policy. That is, while family firms seem to play a significant role in the construction of the European Union, family firms are omitted from public policy beyond direct action related to tax benefits or advice about ownership and management succession. Therefore, the aim of this article is to provoke a debate on the importance of the family business dimension for developing and implementing regional public policy. Specifically, this article addresses the question of whether the family firm matters for regional development and, if so, how the family business dimensions can be included in regional policy strategies. We built our arguments following the regional familiness model and considering that family businesses’ effect on regional development can occur at the firm and regional levels. Our main conclusion is that any public policy intervention should consider the regional familiness characteristics of the regional productive structure because it may boost or hinder regional competitiveness and affect economic growth and development.
AcsZMorckRShaverJM (1997) The internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises: A policy perspective. Small Business Economics9(1): 7–20.
2.
AcsZSzerbL (2007) Entrepreneurship, economic growth and public policy. Small Business Economics28(2–3): 109–122.
3.
AdjeiEKErikssonRHLindgrenU (2016) Social proximity and firm performance: The importance of family member ties in workplaces. Regional Studies, Regional Science3(1): 304–320.
4.
AldrichHECliffJE (2003) The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing18(5): 573–596.
5.
AlmeidaHVWolfenzonD (2006) A theory of pyramidal ownership and family business groups. The Journal of Finance61(6): 2637–2680.
6.
AlsosGACarterSLjunggrenE (2014) Kinship and business: How entrepreneurial households facilitate business growth. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development26(1–2): 97–122.
7.
AngJSJamesWLFloydT (1995) Evidence of the lack of separation between business and personal risks among small businesses. Journal of Small Business Finance4(2/3): 197–210.
AstrachanJHKleinSBSmyrniosKX (2002) The F-PEC scale of family influence: A proposal for solving the family business definition problem1. Family Business Review15(1): 45–58.
10.
AudretschDB (2002) The dynamic role of small firms: Evidence from the U.S. Small Business Economics18(1): 13–40.
11.
BachtlerJ (2001) Where Is Regional Policy Going? Changing Concepts of Regional Policy, Glasgow: University of Strathclyde.
BarberaFMooresK (2013) Firm ownership and productivity: A study of family and non-family SMEs. Small Business Economics40(4): 953–976.
14.
BarcaFMcCannPRodríguez-PoseA (2011) The Case for Regional Development Intervention: Place-Based Versus Place-Neutral Approaches. Working Papers Series in Economics and Social Sciences, Madrid: Institute IMDEA—Social Sciences.
15.
BascoR (2014) Exploring the influence of the family upon firm performance: Does strategic behaviour matter?International Small Business Journal32(8): 967–995.
16.
BascoR (2015) Family business and regional development. A theoretical model of regional familiness. Journal of Family Business Strategy6(4): 259–271.
17.
Basco R (2016) ‘Where do you want to take your family firm?’ A theoretical and empirical exploratory study of family business goals. Business Research Quarterly (forthcoming)..
18.
Basco R and Calabrò A (2016) Open innovation search strategies in family and non-family SMEs: Evidence from a natural resource-based cluster in Chile. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administracion (forthcoming)..
19.
BascoRPérez RodriguezMJ (2009) Studying the family enterprise holistically evidence for integrated family and business systems. Family Business Review22(1): 82–95.
20.
BascoRPérez RodríguezMJ (2011) Ideal types of family business management: Horizontal fit between family and business decisions and the relationship with family business performance. Journal of Family Business Strategy2(3): 151–165.
21.
BatheltHMalmbergAMaskellP (2004) Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography28(1): 31–56.
22.
BecattiniGBellandiMDei OttatiG (2003) From Industrial Districts to Local Development: An Itinerary of Research, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
23.
BjuggrenaCMDaunfeldtS-OJohanssonD (2013) High-growth firms and family ownership. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship26(4): 365–385.
24.
BjuggrenCMJohanssonDSjögrenH (2011) A note on employment and gross domestic product in swedish family-owned businesses: A descriptive analysis. Family Business Review24(4): 362–371.
25.
BMWi (2013) German Mittelstand: Engine of the German Economy. Facts and Figures about Small and Medium-Sized German Firms. Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology (ed), Berlin.
26.
BoschmaR (2005) Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies39(1): 61–74.
27.
BoschmaRFrenkenK (2010) The spatial evolution of innovation networks: A proximity perspective. In: BoschmaRMartinR (eds) The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
28.
CalabròACampopianoGBascoR (2016) Governance structure and internationalization of family-controlled firms: The mediating role of international entrepreneurial orientation. European Management Journal. . Online first doi:10.1016/j.emj.2016.04.007.
29.
Campbell HSJ, James RD and Kunkle G (2013) Firm Growth and Regional Income Convergence: Is There a Connection? Institute for Exceptional Growth Companies—Edward Lowe Foundation. Available at: www.exceptionalgrowth.org/insights/FirmGrowthRegionalIncome.pdf (accessed 11 November 2014).
30.
CapelloR (2008) Regional economics in its 1950s: Recent theoretical directions and future challenges. The Annals of Regional Science42(4): 747–767.
31.
CasillasJCMorenoAMBarberoJL (2010) A configurational approach of the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and growth of family firms. Family Business Review23(1): 27–44.
32.
CerratoDPivaM (2012) The internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises: The effect of family management, human capital and foreign ownership. Journal of Management and Governance16(4): 617–644.
33.
ChuaJHChrismanJJSharmaP (1999) Defining the family business by behaviour. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice27(4): 19–39.
34.
ColliA (2012) Contextualizing performances of family firms. Family Business Review25(3): 243–257.
35.
ColliAGarcía-CanalEGuillénMF (2013) Family character and international entrepreneurship: A historical comparison of Italian and Spanish ‘new multinationals’. Business History55(1): 119–138.
36.
CookePCliftonNOleagaM (2005) Social capital, firm embeddedness and regional development. Regional Studies39(8): 1065–1077.
37.
CrescenziRRodríguez-PoseA (2011) Reconciling top-down and bottom-up development policies. Environment and Planning A43(4): 773–780.
38.
Cucculelli M and Storai D (2015) Family firms and industrial districts. Evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry. Journal of Family Business Strategy 6(4): 234–246.
39.
De MassisAFrattiniFLichtenthalerU (2013) Research on technological innovation in family firms: Present debates and future directions. Family Business Review26(1): 10–31.
40.
Discua CruzAHoworthCHamiltonE (2013) Intrafamily entrepreneurship: The formation and membership of family entrepreneurial teams. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice37(1): 17–46.
EU (2014) Community Research and Development Information Service. European Commission. Available at http://cordis.europa.eu/home_en.html (accessed 10 August 2016).
43.
FairlieRWRobbA (2007) Families, human capital, and small business: Evidence from the characteristics of business owners survey. Industrial and Labor Relations Review60(2): 225–245.
44.
FinkMHarmsRKrausS (2008) Cooperative internationalization of SMEs: Self-commitment as a success factor for International Entrepreneurship. European Management Journal26(6): 429–440.
45.
FritschM (2008) How does new business formation affect regional development? Introduction to the special issue. Small Business Economics30(1): 1–14.
46.
GangL (2012) The Origin of EU Regional Policy in a Theoretical Perspective. Working Paper Series on European Studies of IES, Beijing: Institute of European Studies—Chinese Academy of Social SciencesAvailable at: www.ies.cass.cn/en/Index.asp (accessed 15 January 2014).
47.
GartnerWB (1985) A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. The Academy of Management Review10(4): 696–706.
48.
GlassopLGravesC (2010) Family-owned businesses: Perspectives on Australian policy. International Journal of Management Practice4(3): 293–305.
49.
GonzálezMGuzmánAPomboC (2012) Family firms and financial performance: The cost of growing. Emerging Markets Review13(4): 626–649.
50.
GonzálezMGuzmánAPomboC (2013) Family firms and debt: Risk aversion versus risk of losing control. Journal of Business Research66(11): 2308–2320.
51.
GrabherG (1993) The Embedded Firm: On the Socio-economics of Inter-Firm Networks, London: Routledge.
52.
GurrieriAR (2008) Knowledge network dissemination in a family-firm sector. The Journal of Socio-Economics37(6): 2380–2389.
53.
HaynesGWAveryRJ (1997) Family businesses: Can the family and business finances be separated. Journal of Entrepreneurial and Small Business Finance5(1): 61–74.
54.
HesselsJParkerSC (2013) Constraints, internationalization and growth: A cross-country analysis of European SMEs. Journal of World Business48(1): 137–148.
55.
JohansonJVahlneJ (1977) The internationalization process of the firm—A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies8(1): 23–32.
56.
KnobenJOerlemansLAG (2006) Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration: A literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews8(2): 71–89.
Le Breton-MillerIMillerD (2008) To grow or to harvest? Governance, strategy and performance in family and lone founder firms. Journal of Strategy and Management1(1): 41–56.
59.
LitzRA (1995) The family business: Toward definitional clarity. Family Business Review8(2): 71–81.
60.
LucasREJr (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics22(1): 3–42.
61.
LumpkinGTBrighamKHMossTW (2010) Long-term orientation: Implications for the entrepreneurial orientation and performance of family businesses. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development22(3–4): 241–264.
62.
McDougallPPOviattBM (2000) International Entrepreneurship: The intersection of two research paths. Academy of Management Journal43(5): 902–906.
63.
MandlI (2008) Overview of Family Business Relevant Issues, Vienna, Austria: Austrian Institute for SME Research.
64.
Mason C and Brown R (2010) High Growth Firms in Scotland. Glasgow, Scotland, University of Strathclyde, Scottish Enterprise, Hunter Center for Entrepreneurship.
65.
MasonCBrownR (2013) Creating good public policy to support high-growth firms. Small Business Economics40(2): 211–225.
66.
Merino F, Monreal-Pérez J and Sánchez-Marín G (2014) Family SMEs’ internationalization: Disentangling the influence of familiness on Spanish firms’ export activity. Journal of Small Business Management 53(4): 1164–1184.
67.
MillerDLe Breton-MillerI (2011) Governance, social identity, and entrepreneurial orientation in closely held public companies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice35(5): 1051–1076.
68.
MillerDLe Breton-MillerIScholnickB (2008) Stewardship vs. stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses. Journal of Management Studies45(1): 51–78.
69.
MorckRKWolfenzonDYeungB (2005) Corporate governance, economic entrenchment, and growth. Journal of Economic Literature43(3): 655–720.
70.
OECD and Eurostat (2005) Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd ed. Paris: OECD.
71.
OlsonPDZuikerVSDanesSM (2003) The impact of the family and the business on family business sustainability. Journal of Business Venturing18(5): 639–666.
72.
OttavianoGIPPugaD (1998) Agglomeration in the global economy: A survey of the ‘New Economic Geography’. The World Economy21(6): 707–731.
73.
Pacevicius MenteJDiegelmannC (2013) How to Use Structural Funds for SME & Entrepreneurship Policy. Guidebook Series: How to Support SME Policy from Structural Funds, Belgium: European Union.
74.
PerezPFPuigN (2009) Global lobbies for a global economy: The creation of the Spanish Institute of Family Firms in international perspective. Business History51(5): 712–733.
75.
PikeARodriguez-PoseATomaneyJ (2006) Local and Regional Development, Great Britain: Routledge.
76.
PioreMJSabelCF (1984) The Second Industrial Divide. Possibilities for Prosperity, USA: Basic Books.
77.
RochaHO (2004) Entrepreneurship and development: The role of clusters. Small Business Economics23(5): 363–400.
78.
Rodríguez-PoseA (2013) Do institutions matter for regional development?Regional Studies47(7): 1034–1047.
79.
RomerPM (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy94(5): 1002–1037.
80.
RuzzierMHisrichRDAntoncicB (2006) SME internationalization research: Past, present, and future. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development13(4): 476–497.
81.
SahutJ-MPeris-OrtizM (2014) Small business, innovation, and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics42(4): 663–668.
82.
SchmidTAchleitnerA-KAmpenbergerM (2014) Family firms and R&D behavior – New evidence from a large-scale survey. Research Policy43(1): 233–244.
83.
StimsonRJStoughRNijkampP (2011) Endogenous regional development. In: StimsonRJStoughRNijkampP (eds) Endogenous Regional Development: Perspectives, Measurement and Empirical, Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 1–19.
84.
StoughRWelterFBlockJ (2015) Family business and regional science: ‘Bridging the gap’. Journal of Family Business Strategy6(4): 208–218.
85.
Tajani A and Hahn J (2012) How to Support SME Policy from Structural Funds. Facilitating Transfer of Business. Guidebook Series. Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry.
86.
TharenouP (2005) International work in domestic jobs: An individual explanation. International Journal of Human Resource Management16(4): 475–496.
87.
UzziB (1996) The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review61(4): 674–698.
88.
WestheadPCowlingM (1998) Family firm research: The need for a methodological rethinking. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice23(1): 31–56.
89.
WoolcockM (1998) Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society27(2): 151–208.
90.
WrightMWestheadPUcbasaranD (2007) Internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and international entrepreneurship: A critique and policy implications. Regional Studies41(7): 1013–1030.
