This longitudinal study identifies two core business dimensions important for New Technology-Based Firm (NTBF) survival. These business dimensions are business networks, and entrepreneurial business behaviour and competition. Data was collected from 131 small high-technology firms located in incubators initially in 2005, when most were almost three years old, and again in 2014. A factor analysis was conducted using 17 variables, and a correlation analysis was then performed. Four control variables were also included in the analysis to separate the performance that was due to the firm and the performance that was due to the incubators. Further, three latent variables were developed from the two business dimensions. The findings from this study confirm the importance of business networks and explain how the behaviour and competition of NTBFs during their initial three years may impact firm survival. The latent variables of business and patent advice also had a significant relationship with firm survival.
AaboenLLindelöfPLöfstenH (2008) Incubator performance: An efficiency frontier analysis. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research2(4): 354–380.
2.
AckroydS (1995) On the structure and dynamics of some small, UK-based information technology firms. Journal of Management Studies32(2): 141–161.
3.
AnandBKhannaT (2000) Do firms learn to create value? The case of Alliances. Strategic Management Journal21(3): 295–315.
4.
AppoldS (1991) The location process of industrial research laboratories. The Annals of Regional Science25(2): 131–144.
5.
AudretschDB (1995) Innovation and Industry Evolution, Cambridge: MIT Press.
6.
BamfordCEMcDougallPP (2000) An examination of the impact of initial founding conditions and decisions upon the performance of new bank start-ups. Journal of Business Venturing15(3): 253–277.
7.
BirleyS (1985) The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing1(1): 107–117.
8.
BergekANorrmanC (2008) Incubator best practice: A framework. Technovation28(1–2): 20–28.
9.
BowerDJ (2003) Business model fashion and the academic spinout firm. R&D Management33(2): 97–106.
10.
ChanKFLauT (2005) Assessing technology incubator programs in the science park: The good, the bad and the ugly. Technovation25(10): 1215–1228.
11.
ChildJ (1972) Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology6(1): 1–22.
12.
Cohen WM, Nelson RR and Walsh JP (2000) Protecting their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not). NBER Working Paper, Cambridge, MA.
13.
CookRCampbellDKellyC (2012) Survival rates of new firms: An exploratory study. Small Business Institute Journal8(2): 35–42.
14.
CovinJGSlevinDP (1991) A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice16(1): 7–25.
15.
DasTKTengB-S (1997) Time and entrepreneurial risk behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice22(2): 69–88.
16.
DunneTRobertsMJSamuelsonL (1988) Patterns from entry and exit in US manufacturing industries. The RAND Journal of Economics19(4): 495–515.
17.
Eurostat (2013) Business demography statistics. European Commission.
18.
GregoryWDSheahenTP (1991) Technology transfer by spin-off companies. In: BrettAM (eds) University Spin-Offs Companies – Economic Development, Faculty Entrepreneurs and Technology Transfer, New York, USA: Rowan and Littlefield Publisher.
19.
GrindleyPCTeeceDJ (1997) Managing intellectual capital: Licensing and cross-licensing in semiconductors and electronics. California Management Review39(2): 8–41.
20.
GulatiR (1998) Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal19(4): 397–420.
HairJFAndersonRETathamRL (1995) Multivariate Data Analysis, 3rd ed. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
23.
KhandwallaP (1987) Generators of pioneering innovative management: Some Indian evidence. Organization Studies8(1): 39–59.
24.
KirchhoffB (1994) Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capitalism, Westport, CT: Praeger.
25.
KnaupAE (2005) Survival and longevity in the business employment dynamics data. Monthly Labor Review128(59): 50–56.
26.
KnaupAEPiazzaMC (2007) Business employment dynamics data: Survival and longevity, II. Monthly Labor Review130(9): 3–10.
27.
LevinTCKlevorickAKNelsonRR (1987) Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity3(special issue): 783–820.
28.
LippmanSRumeltR (1982) Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency competition. The Bell Journal of Economics13(2): 418–438.
29.
LöfstenH (2010) Critical incubator dimensions for small firm performance – A study of new technology-based firms localized in 16 incubators. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research4(3): 256–279.
30.
LöfstenH (2015) Critical resource dimensions for development of patents – An analysis of 131 new technology-based firms in incubators. International Journal of Innovation Management15(1): DOI: 10.1142/S1363919615500061.
31.
LöfstenHLindelöfP (2002) Science parks and the growth of new technology based firms – Academic-industry links, innovation and markets. Research Policy31(6): 859–876.
32.
LöfstenHLindelöfP (2003) Determinants for an entrepreneurial milieu – Science parks and business policy in growing firms. Technovation23(1): 51–64.
33.
MarchJG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science2(1): 71–87.
34.
MillerD (1987) The structural and environmental correlates of business strategy. Strategic Management Journal8(1): 55–76.
35.
MonkR (2000) Why small businesses fail. CMA Management74(6): 12–13.
36.
NadlerDATushmanM (1999) The organization of the future: Strategic imperatives and core competencies for the 21st century. Organizational Dynamics28(1): 45–60.
37.
NewbertSTornikoskiE (2012) Supporter networks and networking activity: A contingency model of organizational emergence. Small Business Economics39(1): 141–159.
38.
NewbertSTornikoskiE (2013) Resource acquisition in the emergence phase: Considering the effects of embeddedness and dependence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice37(2): 249–280.
39.
ReedRDeFillippiRJ (1990) Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review15(1): 88–102.
40.
RivetteKGKlineD (2000) Discovering new value in intellectual property. Harvard Business Review78(1): 54–66.
41.
RumeltRP (1984) Towards a strategic theory of the firm. In: LambRB (ed.) Strategic Management, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
42.
RumeltRP (1987) Theory, strategy and entrepreneurship. In: TeeceDJ (ed.) Competitive Challenge, New York: NY: Harper and Row.
43.
SimonDGHittMA (2003) Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice27(4): 339–358.
44.
SlevinDPCovinJG (1994) Entrepreneurship as firm behavior: A research model. In: KatzJEBrockhausRH (eds) Advances Infirm Emergence, Growth and Entrepreneurship, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 2.
45.
StoreyD (1994) Understanding the Small Business Sector, London: International Thomson Business Press.
46.
TaylorCSilberstonA (1973) The Economic Impact of the Patent System, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
TeeceDJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaborating, licensing and public policy. Research Policy15(6): 285–305.
48.
UzziB (1996) The source and consequences of emededdness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review61(4): 674–698.
49.
UzziB (1997) Social structure and competition in inter firm networks: The paradox of emededdness. Administrative Science Quarterly42(1): 35–67.
50.
van PraagM (2003) Business survival and success of young small business owners. Small Business Economics2(1): 1–17.
51.
WatsonJEverettJ (1996) Do small businesses have high failure rates? Evidence from Australian retailers. Journal of Small Business Management34(4): 45–62.
52.
WiklundJShepherdD (2005) Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing20(1): 71–91.
53.
WuCYoungA (2002) Critical operating problems and survival rates in small firms: A look at small business institute clients. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship7(1): 1–33.
54.
ZukinSDiMaggioPJ (1990) Structure of Capital, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
