This study examines the level of interconnectedness and the relational power of stakeholders operating in four local territorial systems (LTSs) localized in a southern Italian province. Such an analysis allows for the determination of the dominant rationality of each LTS, i.e. the pattern of distribution of decision-making power among its stakeholders and hence the extent to which each of them is capable of influencing local governance processes. In all four LTS, public institutions are revealed to be endowed with higher relational power than the other stakeholders. The dominant rationality of each LTS and policy implications deriving from results are discussed.
BooherDEInnesJE (2002) Network power in collaborative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research21(3): 221–236.
2.
BorgattiSP (2005) Centrality and network flow. Social Networks27(1): 55–71.
3.
BorgattiSPEverettMGFreemanLC (2002) UCINET 6 for Windows, Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
4.
BrassDJBurkhardtME (1993) Potential power and power use: An investigation of structure and behaviour. Academy of Management Review36(3): 441–470.
5.
CooperCScottNBaggioR (2009) Network position and perceptions of destination stakeholders importance. Anatolia20(1): 33–45.
6.
CoulsonAFerrarioC (2007) Institutional thickness: Local governance and economic development in Birmingham, England. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research31(3): 591–615.
7.
Del ChiappaGPresenzaA (2013) The use of network analysis to assess relationships among stakeholders within a tourism destination: An empirical investigation on Costa Smeralda-Gallura, Italy. Tourism Analysis18(1): 1–13.
8.
DredgeD (2006) Policy networks and the local organization of tourism. Tourism Management27(2): 269–280.
9.
EtzkowitzHLeydesdorffL (2000) The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy29(2): 109–123.
10.
EversoleR (2011) Community agency and community engagement: Re-theorising participation in governance. Journal of Public Policy31(1): 51–71.
11.
FeldSCCarterWC (2002) Detecting measurement bias in respondent reports of personal networks. Social Networks24(4): 365–383.
12.
FreemanL (1979) Centrality in social networks. Social Networks1(3): 215–239.
13.
FritschMKauffeld-MonzM (2010) The impact of network structure on knowledge transfer: An application of social network analysis in the context of regional innovation networks. The Annals of Regional Science44(1): 21–38.
14.
GedikliB (2009) The role of leadership in the success of participatory planning processes experience from Turkey. European Urban and Regional Studies16(2): 115–130.
15.
GetznerM (2002) Ecotourism, stakeholders and regional sustainable development. In: HagedornK (ed.) Environmental Co-operation and Institutional Change, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 315–341.
16.
GiulianiEBellM (2005) The micro-determinants of meso-learning and innovation: Evidence from a Chilean wine cluster. Research Policy34(1): 47–68.
17.
Guido G (2000) Un approccio strategico al marketing dei sistemi territoriali locali. Economia e Diritto del Terziario2: 605–629.
18.
Guido G (2007) The development of tourist and industrial districts in South Italy: A strategic marketing perspective. Sinergie26(4): 191–200.
19.
Guido G (2012) The peculiar nature of place marketing according to an inductional approach. Plurimondi5(10): 137–155.
20.
Guido G, Prete MI and Giannuzzi M (2012) Network analysis of local territorial systems in Salento: A strategic marketing study. In: 28th Industrial Marketing and Purchasing (IMP) Conference, Rome, 11–15 September.
21.
Guido G, Amatulli C, Pino G, et al. (2013) Customer-centric strategies in place marketing: An analysis of places' identities and perceived images. In: Kaufmann HR and Panni MFAK (eds) Customer-Centric Marketing Strategies: Tools for Building Organizational Performance. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 435–452.
22.
HadjimichalisCHudsonR (2006) Networks, regional development and democratic control. International Journal of Urban and Regional Development30(4): 858–872.
23.
HolmanN (2008) Community participation: Using Social Network Analysis to improve developmental benefits. Environment and Planning C – Government & Policy26(3): 525–543.
24.
JainA (2011) Knowledge distribution nodes and home based businesses: Role of local business associations and local council in Casey LGA. Australasian Journal of Regional Studies17(2): 122–145.
25.
LiEYLiaoCHYenHR (2013) Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective. Research Policy42(9): 1515–1530.
26.
LøvsethT (2009) The state and social networks. Scandinavian Political Studies32(3): 272–295.
27.
McGuirkPM. (2000) Power and policy networks in urban governance: Local government and property-led regeneration in Dublin. Urban Studies37(4): 651–672.
28.
MarquesE (2012) State institutions, power, and social networks in Brazilian urban policies. Latin American Research Review47(2): 27–50.
29.
MarzanoGScottN (2009) Power in destination branding. Annals of Tourism Research36(2): 247–267.
30.
Ndou V and Passiante G (2005) Value creation in tourism network systems. In: Frew AJ (ed.) Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism. New York: Springer, pp. 440–451.
31.
NieminemJ (1974) On the centrality in a graph. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology15(1): 322–336.
32.
NormannHRVasströmM (2012) Municipalities as governance network actors in rural communities. European Planning Studies20(6): 941–960.
33.
ProvanKGKenisP (2008) Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research18(2): 229–252.
34.
RowleyTJ (1997) Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review22(4): 887–910.
35.
RullaniE (1989) La teoria dell’impresa: Soggetti, sistemi, evoluzione. In: RispoliM (ed.) L’impresa industriale, Bologna: il Mulino.
36.
Rullani E (1993) Networks and internationalization: Managing complexity through knowledge. In: Zan L, Zambon S and Pettigrew AM (eds) Perspective on Strategic Change. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 107–148.
37.
SabidussiG (1966) The centrality index of a graph. Psichometrika31(1): 581–603.
38.
ScottJ (2000) Social Network Analysis: A Handbook, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
39.
SørensenETorfingJ (2005) The democratic anchorage of governance networks. Scandinavian Political Studies28(3): 195–218.
40.
SteinerM (2011) Regional knowledge networks. In: CookePAsheimBBoschmaR (eds) Handbook of Regional Innovation and Growth, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
41.
SvenssonBNordinSFlagestadA (2005) A governance perspective on destination development-exploring partnerships, clusters and innovation systems. Tourism Review60(2): 32–37.
42.
Ter WalALJBoshmaRA (2009) Applying social network analysis in economic geography: Framing some key analytic issues. The Annals of Regional Science43(3): 739–756.
43.
TimurSGetzD (2008) A network perspective on managing stakeholders for sustainable urban tourism. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management20(4): 445–461.
44.
WassermanSFaustK (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
WrongD (1995) Power: Its Forms, Bases, and Uses, 2nd ed. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
